The Articulated Oral Airway as an Aid to Mask Ventilation
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Articulating Oral Airway (AOA) is a novel oral airway which actively displaces the tongue, allowing for a greater cross-sectional area for mask ventilation. The investigators hypothesize that, in patients with predictors for difficult mask ventilation, the AOA will be non-inferior to the Geudel oral airway in terms of expired tidal volumes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 11, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 25, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 23, 2021
CompletedJuly 23, 2021
July 1, 2021
1.6 years
April 17, 2017
April 20, 2021
July 1, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Expiratory Tidal Volume (Breaths 6-10)
Measured expiratory tidal volume (from video of anesthesia monitor). Each participant had measurements collected during breaths number 6-10 after the insertion of each oral airway (GOA or AOA) with the order of first treatment randomized. The average expiratory tidal volumes reported were weight standardized per kilogram of participant's body weight, meaning the expiratory measurements were divided by the participant's weight (kg). A total of 56 patients were enrolled and randomized--28 received the Guedel Oral Airway first and 28 received the Articulated Oral Airway first. The average expiratory values are reported as outlined in table below: Guedel inserted first AOA inserted first Guedel inserted second AOA inserted second
Measured immediately after placement of each oral airway; an average of 2-5 minutes.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Inspiratory Tidal Volume (Breaths 6-10)
Measured immediately after placement of each oral airway; an average of 2-5 minutes.
Immediate Oropharyngeal Trauma From Oral Airway Randomized to be Placed First
Measured immediately after removal of first oral airway and before placing the second oral airway
Study Arms (2)
Guedel oral airway
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach participant in the study will have both devices (GOA or AOA). The participants reported in this arm were randomized to receive the Guedel oral airway first and measurements were taken during breaths 6 through 10. After its removal the Articulated Oral Airway was inserted and measurements were repeated again during breaths 6 through 10.
Articulated Oral Airway
EXPERIMENTALEach participant in the study will have both devices (GOA or AOA). The participants reported in this arm were randomized to receive the Articulated oral airway first and measurements were taken during breaths 6 through 10. After its removal the Guedel Oral Airway was inserted and measurements were repeated again during breaths 6 through 10.
Interventions
The AOA is a novel device which actively displaces the tongue, allowing for a greater cross-sectional area for mask ventilation. The AOA will be evaluated for efficacy of mask ventilation.
The Guedel oral airway is a standard oral airway commonly used to facilitate mask ventilation. The Guedel oral airway will be evaluated for efficacy of mask ventilation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals demonstrating 2 or greater predictors of difficult mask ventilation (as listed below) who are scheduled for elective surgery with general anesthesia and asleep mask ventilation/orotracheal intubation utilizing long-acting neuromuscular blockade.
- Predictors of difficult mask ventilation i) Age \> 55 years ii) BMI \> 30kg/m2 iii) Beard iv) Lack of teeth v) History of snoring
You may not qualify if:
- Documented history of impossible mask ventilation
- Planned omission of mask ventilation ('rapid-sequence induction,' etc.)
- Planned omission of long-acting paralytics
- Need for awake airway management
- Need for emergent airway protection
- Presence of oropharyngeal anatomic abnormalities
- Distance from the maxillary incisors to the angle of the mandible \<11cm
- \<18 years of age
- Known pregnant state
- Current incarceration
- Refusal to be involved in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ron Abronslead
Study Sites (1)
The University of Iowa Hospital
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Related Publications (5)
Koga K, Sata T, Kaku M, Takamoto K, Shigematsu A. Comparison of no airway device, the Guedel-type airway and the Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway with mask ventilation during manual in-line stabilization. J Clin Anesth. 2001 Feb;13(1):6-10. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00228-2.
PMID: 11259887BACKGROUNDLangeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, Guggiari M, Bianchi A, Coriat P, Riou B. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000 May;92(5):1229-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00009.
PMID: 10781266BACKGROUNDKheterpal S, Han R, Tremper KK, Shanks A, Tait AR, O'Reilly M, Ludwig TA. Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2006 Nov;105(5):885-91. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200611000-00007.
PMID: 17065880BACKGROUNDKheterpal S, Martin L, Shanks AM, Tremper KK. Prediction and outcomes of impossible mask ventilation: a review of 50,000 anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2009 Apr;110(4):891-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819b5b87.
PMID: 19293691BACKGROUNDAbrons RO, Ten Eyck P, Sheffield ID. The Articulated Oral Airway as an aid to mask ventilation: a prospective, randomized, interventional, non-inferiority study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Mar 29;21(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01315-8.
PMID: 33781212DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ron Abrons, MD
- Organization
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ron O Abrons, MD
The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Anesthesia facemasks will be opacified so that the clinical provider will be blinded to which oral airway (Guedel vs AOA) is being used and in what order. The patient will be anesthetized and thus blinded. The Investigator and Outcomes Assessor will only see video of the data on the anesthesia monitor (not the patient/device/etc) and will thus be blinded. The only individuals who will not be blinded are the Research Assistants who will not be involved in data analysis.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 17, 2017
First Posted
May 8, 2017
Study Start
July 11, 2017
Primary Completion
February 25, 2019
Study Completion
February 25, 2019
Last Updated
July 23, 2021
Results First Posted
July 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share