Comparison of Mask Ventilation in Obese Patients by Differents One Hand Techniques
E&c / T&E
Efficacy of Hook Technique Versus Traditional Methods for Single Hand Ventilation in Obese Patients A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
375
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this controled clinical trial study to know if hook tecnique method is better than other traditional one hand ventilation methods in acheiving effective ventilation in obese patients . The main questions it aims to answer \[are\]: Primary Outcome Measures
- Chest Rise and Fall: This will be visually assessed by an independent observer. evaluation the techniques based on the chest expansion score from 1 to 4. To evaluate Chest Rising in the studied patients, by visual method, patients were categorized into four groups: the amount of chest rising in group one was between 0 and 25% (score 1), 25-50% in group two (score 2), 50-75% in group three (score 3) and 75-100% in group four (score 4). Patients in group one and two considered to have unsuccessful ventilation due to lack in chest rise, and in groups three and four, the ventilation was considered successful • Ultra-sounded guided diaphragmatic excursion: It will be considered successful ventilation if Diaphragmatic excursion more than 2 cm and will be considered ventilation failure if less than 2 cm • Oxygen Saturation: SpO2 levels will be continuously monitored using a pulse oximeter, with readings recorded at baseline (before ventilation) and at regular intervals (every 15 seconds) until effective ventilation is achieved or the 2-minute mark is reached.
- Measurement of Exhaled Tidal Volume: Determine if the Hook Technique provides superior tidal volume (mL/kg of predicted body weight) compared to the E-C and T-E techniques within the first 2 minutes of ventilation and will be consider successful ventilation if exhaled tidal volume more than 6 ml per kg and failure if less than 6 ml per kg
- Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP): Compare the peak inspiratory pressures generated during ventilation with each technique and will be consider failure of ventilation if more than 30 Lower PIP for a given tidal volume indicates more efficient ventilation, which is particularly important in obese patients who often require higher pressures due to increased airway resistance Secondary Outcome Measures
- Time to Achieve Effective Ventilation:
- The stopwatch will start as soon as the anesthesiologist initiates the ventilation technique.
- The time will be stopped when the criteria for effective ventilation (chest rise and fall, SpO2 ≥ 95%) are met.
- This measure provides an indication of the efficiency of each technique in rapidly achieving effective ventilation.
- Rate of Ventilation Attempts:
- Incidence of Ventilation Failure:
- Complications:
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 27, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 27, 2026
CompletedApril 2, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.1 years
January 6, 2025
March 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ventilation success,
Chest rise score ≥3 on a validated 5-point scale (0 = no chest movement; 1 = minimal; 2 = slight; 3 = adequate; 4 = good; 5 = excellent) assessed by a blinded observer at 30 seconds.\[
At time of enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Time to Achieve Effective Ventilation Using the Hook Technique Versus E/C and T/E Techniques in Obese Patients
At time of enrollment
Number of Attempts Needed to Achieve Effective Ventilation Using the Hook Technique Versus E/C and T/E Techniques
At time of enrollment
Ease of use of the Hook Technique Compared to E/C and T/E Techniques as Rated by Anesthesiologists
At time of enrollment
Exhaled tidal volume (ETV, mL):
From enrollment to the end of study at 12 months
Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP, cmH₂O)
At time of enrollment
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Group Hook technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORnovel method for single-hand ventilation that has shown promise in preliminary studies. This technique involves a unique hand positioning that aims to improve mask seal and ventilation efficacy, particularly in patients with challenging airway anatomy. In Hook Technique using the thumb and index finger to form a hook around the mask, creating a more secure and adjustable seal and utilizing the remaining fingers to apply consistent mandibular lift
Group E&c technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORE-C clamp technique involves forming a "C" with the thumb and index finger around the mask while the remaining fingers form an "E" to lift the mandible. This technique aims to provide a good seal while opening the airway.
Group T&E
ACTIVE COMPARATORT-E technique is a variation where the thumb and index finger form a "T" over the mask while the other fingers provide chin lift and jaw thrust. This method is designed to optimize airway patency and mask seal. While these techniques are widely taught and practiced, they often fall short in obese patients due to the difficulty in maintaining an adequate seal and achieving sufficient ventilation pressures. Complications such as hypoxemia and gastric insufflation are more common in this population
Interventions
The E-C clamp technique involves forming a "C" with the thumb and index finger around the mask while the remaining fingers form an "E" to lift the mandible. This technique aims to provide a good seal while opening the airway.
The T-E technique is a variation where the thumb and index finger form a "T" over the mask while the other fingers provide chin lift and jaw thrust. This method is designed to optimize airway patency and mask seal. While these techniques are widely taught and practiced, they often fall short in obese patients due to the difficulty in maintaining an adequate seal and achieving sufficient ventilation pressures. Complications such as hypoxemia and gastric insufflation are more common in this population.
e is a novel method for single-hand ventilation that has shown promise in preliminary studies. This technique involves a unique hand positioning that aims to improve mask seal and ventilation efficacy, particularly in patients with challenging airway anatomy. In Hook Technique using the thumb and index finger to form a hook around the mask, creating a more secure and adjustable seal and utilizing the remaining fingers to apply consistent mandibular lift, enhancing airway patency.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- bmi \> 30
You may not qualify if:
- bmi\>40
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aswan Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Aswan University Hospital
Aswān, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Fei M, Blair JL, Rice MJ, Edwards DA, Liang Y, Pilla MA, Shotwell MS, Jiang Y. Comparison of effectiveness of two commonly used two-handed mask ventilation techniques on unconscious apnoeic obese adults. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Apr 1;118(4):618-624. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex035.
PMID: 28403406BACKGROUNDSoleimanpour M, Rahmani F, Ala A, Morteza Bagi HR, Mahmoodpoor A, Golzari SE, Zahmatyar F, Mehdizadeh Esfanjani R, Soleimanpour H. Comparison of four techniques on facility of two-hand Bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation: E-C, Thenar Eminence, Thenar Eminence (Dominant hand)-E-C (non-dominant hand) and Thenar Eminence (non-dominant hand) - E-C (dominant hand). J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2016;8(4):147-151. doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2016.30. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
PMID: 28210469BACKGROUNDBalafar M, Pouraghaei M, Paknezhad SP, Abad SNA, Soleimanpour H. Evaluation the quality of bag-mask ventilation by E/C, T/E and hook technique (a new proposed technique). BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02349-w. Erratum In: BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02545-2.
PMID: 37996828BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2025
First Posted
February 10, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion
March 27, 2026
Study Completion
March 27, 2026
Last Updated
April 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share