A Between Patient Study of Plurogel® Compared to Standard Topical Dressing in Burn Injuries
A Between Patient, Pilot Randomized Controlled Study of Plurogel® Compared to Standard Topical Dressing in Burn Injuries
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Burn injuries can result in long term physical and mental sequelae, not only from the scarring but also the painful dressings. The standard of care today remains use of antibiotic topical dressings while awaiting demarcation of the burn depth, with surgical excision and grafting for deep partial thickness and full thickness areas. Demarcation can be appreciated on admission for full thickness burns but is often a prolonged process that can last weeks. The clinical evaluation of the depth of the burn is a complex decision that often is made more challenging by the presence of the proteinaceous pseudoeschar and the coagulated dermis itself. Surgical debridement is relatively 'coarse' and by its very nature requires removal of a thin layer of viable tissue to reach the level that is vascularized enough to support a skin graft. There has been growing interest in the use of adjuncts to reduce the amount tissue debrided and potentially reduce the need for surgery itself. Operatively, there have been some reports that use of hydro-dissection devices (Versajet™) may allow a more controlled debridement, resulting in less viable tissue being sacrificed. There is also a growing experience with enzymatic debridement, especially with Bromolein, derived from Pineapple (NexoBrid®). Neither of these have been shown to definitively improve care in randomized controlled trials, (RCTs) and there is suggestion that in some settings may actually cause harm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Oct 2021
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
December 5, 2024
December 1, 2024
5.1 years
May 19, 2021
December 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary outcome
Days to over 80% area of burn injury healed
1-14 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Patient and caregiver satisfaction and perception of pain
At each dressing change
Proportion requiring surgery
1-14 days
Relative surface area skin grafted
1-14 days
Study Arms (2)
Standard dressing
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopical antibiotic ointment (Polysporin™ or formulary equivalent) and non-adherent petrolatum fine-meshed gauze (ADAPTIC™) applied every Monday, Wednesday and Friday (or equivalent).
Test dressing
EXPERIMENTALA 0.5 cm layer of PluroGel® followed by the above standard dressing. In addition, this will be covered with moistened gauze, kept moist twice daily. (The additional factors are the use of PluroGel® and moistened gauze. Standard dressing will continue to be used.)
Interventions
A 0.5 cm layer of PluroGel® followed by the above standard dressing. In addition, this will be covered with moistened gauze, kept moist twice daily. (The additional factors are the use of PluroGel® and moistened gauze. Standard dressing will continue to be used.)
Topical antibiotic ointment (Polysporin™ or formulary equivalent) and non-adherent petrolatum fine-meshed gauze (ADAPTIC™) applied every Monday, Wednesday and Friday (or equivalent).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Persons with partial thickness face burns or unilateral limb burn injuries requiring admission.
You may not qualify if:
- Total burn surface area (TBSA) \>30%.
- Burn depth full thickness or deeper on initial assessment.
- Prior excision at another healthcare centre.
- Patients with pre-existing malnutrition
- Electrical, chemical or other unusual burn etiologies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Manitobalead
- Medline Industriescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2021
First Posted
August 11, 2021
Study Start
October 20, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share