Polymem vs. Bacitracin/Xeroform in Treating Burn Wounds
Prospective Randomized Trial of Polymem vs. Bacitracin/Xeroform for Superficial Second Degree Burns
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients will be screened at the initial visit to the burn center. If the patients are eligible according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, consent for the study will be obtained. One of the investigators will identify two sites that appear to be the same depth on each patient \[1 site Polymen and 1 site bacitracin/xeroform )\]. The depth of injury will be verified as partial thickness using laser doppler. Each site will be at least 4cm x 4cm in size. One site will be identified for bacitracin/xeroform and one site for Polymen. All burns will be initially debrided and cleaned according to burn unit protocol. The dressing will then be applied. All dressings will be covered with cotton gauze and ace wraps. Laser Doppler will be utilized to determine burn depth at both the trial and control sites. On each subsequent visit, patients will rate the pain of the dressing change on a 1-10 pain intensity scale. It will be noted if the wound appears infected or if antibiotics are prescribed. The study will end for each patient when the investigator determines that 95% of their burn has re-epithelized.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Oct 2006
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedSeptember 11, 2017
August 1, 2017
2.2 years
May 25, 2007
September 7, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to wound healing
21 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparing two FDA cleared products for decreased frequency of dressing changes to every third day, less pain, decrease in infection, and cost effectiveness.
21 days
Study Arms (1)
1
OTHERThere is one arm to the study. The same subjects are their own control. One of the investigators will identify two sites that appear to be the same depth on each patient \[1 site Polymen and 1 site bacitracin/xeroform )\]. One site will be identified for bacitracin/xeroform and one site for Polymen. All burns will be initially debrided and cleaned according to burn unit protocol. Laser Doppler will be utilized to determine burn depth at both the trial and control sites. On each subsequent visit, patients will rate the pain of the dressing change on a 1-10 pain intensity scale.The study will end for each patient when the investigator determines that 95% of their burn has re-epithelized.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age + to or greater than 18
- Superficial 2nd degree burns of the trunk and extremities which the evaluating investigator believes will heal within 21 days without the need for surgery.
- Burn injury is less than 48 hours old
- Patient is able to return to burn clinic for required follow-up.
- Burn is of sufficient size to permit the application of trial and control dressings
- Outpatient
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18
- Burn injury over 48 hours old
- Deep burn not expected to heal within 21 days
- Extremely superficial burn expected to heal in less than 7 days.
- Infected burns
- Patient unable to return to clinic for required follow-up (i.e. will use visiting nurse or PCP for follow-up).
- Patient unable to give consent.
- Inpatient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109, United States
Related Publications (4)
Carr RD, Lalagos DE. Clinical evaluation of a polymeric membrane dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Decubitus. 1990 Aug;3(3):38-42.
PMID: 2205233BACKGROUNDAgren MS, Mertz PM, Franzen L. A comparative study of three occlusive dressings in the treatment of full-thickness wounds in pigs. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Jan;36(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(97)70325-6.
PMID: 8996261BACKGROUNDFowler E, Papen JC. Clinical evaluation of a polymeric membrane dressing in the treatment of dermal ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1991 Jul-Aug;35:35-8, 40-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 1878118BACKGROUNDBlackman JD, Senseng D, Quinn L, Mazzone T. Clinical evaluation of a semipermeable polymeric membrane dressing for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 1994 Apr;17(4):322-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.4.322.
PMID: 8026290BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles Yowler, MD
MetroHealth Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor of Trauma Burns Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2007
First Posted
May 28, 2007
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
September 11, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08