A Study of Plurogel® Compared to Standard Topical Dressing in Burn Injuries
A Within Patient, Pilot Randomized Controlled Study of Plurogel® Compared to Standard Topical Dressing in Burn Injuries
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Burn injuries can result in long term physical and mental sequelae, not only from the scarring but also the painful dressings. The standard of care today remains use of antibiotic topical dressings while awaiting demarcation of the burn depth, with surgical excision and grafting for deep partial thickness and full thickness areas. Demarcation can be appreciated on admission for full thickness burns but is often a prolonged process that can last weeks. The clinical evaluation of the depth of the burn is a complex decision that often is made more challenging by the presence of the proteinaceous pseudoeschar and the coagulated dermis itself. Surgical debridement is relatively 'coarse' and by its very nature requires removal of a thin layer of viable tissue to reach the level that is vascularized enough to support a skin graft. There has been growing interest in the use of adjuncts to reduce the amount tissue debrided and potentially reduce the need for surgery itself. Operatively, there have been some reports that use of hydro-dissection devices (Versajet™) may allow a more controlled debridement, resulting in less viable tissue being sacrificed. There is also a growing experience with enzymatic debridement, especially with Bromolein, derived from Pineapple (NexoBrid®). Neither of these have been shown to definitively improve care in randomized controlled trials, (RCTs) and there is suggestion that in some settings may actually cause harm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Oct 2021
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2029
April 28, 2026
April 1, 2026
7.3 years
May 14, 2021
April 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion healed
Proportion of burn requiring skin grafting (grafted cm2/ total burn area on that limb cm2) compared between a standard dressing limb and a PluroGel® treated limb.
14 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Proportion requiring surgery
14 days
Study Arms (2)
Standard dressing
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopical antibiotic ointment (Polysporin™ or formulary equivalent) and non-adherent petrolatum fine-meshed gauze (ADAPTIC™) applied every Monday, Wednesday and Friday (or equivalent).
Test dressing
EXPERIMENTALA 0.5 cm layer of PluroGel® followed by the above standard dressing. In addition, this will be covered with moistened gauze, kept moist twice daily. (The additional factors are the use of PluroGel® and moistened gauze. Standard dressing will continue to be used.)
Interventions
Topical antibiotic ointment (Polysporin™ or formulary equivalent) and non-adherent petrolatum fine-meshed gauze (ADAPTIC™) applied every Monday, Wednesday and Friday (or equivalent).
A 0.5 cm layer of PluroGel® followed by the above standard dressing. In addition, this will be covered with moistened gauze, kept moist twice daily. (The additional factors are the use of PluroGel® and moistened gauze. Standard dressing will continue to be used.)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Persons with bilateral limb partial thickness burn injuries of similar depth requiring admission
You may not qualify if:
- Total body surface area (TBSA) of burn \>30%.
- Burn depth full thickness or deeper on initial assessment.
- Prior excision at another healthcare centre.
- Patients with pre-existing malnutrition
- Electrical, chemical or other unusual burn etiologies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2021
First Posted
May 20, 2021
Study Start
October 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2029
Last Updated
April 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share