NCT04986787

Brief Summary

Impaired working memory (WM) plays a crucial role in normal aging, in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cognitive decline associated with dementia, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aging-related differences in WM are hypothesized to be based on various neurobiological origins, for example alterations in the dynamic interplay between the large-scale brain networks have proven an important role. Recent studies have shown that non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods can modulate neuronal activity, plasticity and large-scale brain network interactions. The investigators hypothesize that multifocal NIBS can improve WM. By successive and concurrent stimulation of multiple brain regions of the WM network by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and/or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) the investigators will study dynamic interactions between distinct cortico-cortical and subcortico-cortical brain areas. By leveraging multimodal systems neuroscience information during multifocal stimulation, the investigators expect to acquire better mechanistic understand through which NIBS acts on the brain and improves cognitive functions, such as WM.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 19, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 3, 2021

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2021

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 25, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

April 19, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

non-invasive brain stimulationtACSTMScognitionworking memoryMCIhealthy ageingEEGneuroimaging (MRI)oscillatory activity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Working memory performance

    We will compare the baseline-normalized reaction time and error rate of a N-back task between the real and sham stimulation condition in a cross-over design.

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • The reproducibility of the outcomes of this proof-of-concept brain stimulation in MCI between centers

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • The neural underpinning of NIBS-induced changes quantified by s/fMRI and network-based analytical approaches.

    The changes will be computed from the difference between connectivity at baseline and 1 hour post-stimulation.

  • The neural underpinning of NIBS-induced changes quantified by EEG.

    Baseline and 1 hour after the delivery of real or sham intervention - cross-over design.

  • Transfer of the acquired WM abilities during the intervention into a daily-life relevant scenario as assessed by The Virtual Supermarket Shopping Task.

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (4)

Entrainment with personalized bi-focal fronto-parietal synchronized tACS in HV - within-frequency

EXPERIMENTAL

double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over trials assessing the effects of individualized fronto-parietal tACS on a visual working memory task in aged HV

Device: tACS

Entrainment with personalized bi-focal fronto-parietal synchronized tACS in HV - cross-frequency

EXPERIMENTAL

double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over trials assessing the effects of individualized cross-frequency fronto-parietal tACS stimulation on a visual WM task in aged HV

Device: tACS

Cerebellar rTMS to modify the effects of cortico-cortical, fronto-parietal tACS in HV

EXPERIMENTAL

double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over trial assessing the effects of cerebellar stimulation on individualized fronto-parietal tACS stimulation during a visual WM task in aged HV

Device: tACSDevice: TMS

Neuromodulation protocol in MCI patients (precise protocol to be chosen on results of previous arms)

EXPERIMENTAL

double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over trials assessing the effects of individualized striatal TIS combined with cereberal TMS on a visual working memory task in MCI patients

Device: TMSDevice: TIS

Interventions

tACSDEVICE

a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that allows interaction with endogenous cortical oscillatory rhythms

Cerebellar rTMS to modify the effects of cortico-cortical, fronto-parietal tACS in HVEntrainment with personalized bi-focal fronto-parietal synchronized tACS in HV - cross-frequencyEntrainment with personalized bi-focal fronto-parietal synchronized tACS in HV - within-frequency
TMSDEVICE

a noninvasive procedure that uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain, it will be specifically cerebellar stimulation

Cerebellar rTMS to modify the effects of cortico-cortical, fronto-parietal tACS in HVNeuromodulation protocol in MCI patients (precise protocol to be chosen on results of previous arms)
TISDEVICE

temporal interference stimulation targeted to striatum, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that allows interaction with endogenous cortical oscillatory rhythms deep in the brain

Neuromodulation protocol in MCI patients (precise protocol to be chosen on results of previous arms)

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • normal cognitive performance as assessed by a cognitive screening for healthy subjects
  • mild cognitive impairment as assessed by detailed cognitive testing ± positive AD diagnostic biomarkers for MCI subjects

You may not qualify if:

  • Psychiatric disorders including major depression, major vascular lesions, or other brain pathologies that might present with cognitive decline.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ceitec Masaryk University

Brno, 62500, Czechia

RECRUITING

Related Publications (8)

  • Saunders NL, Summers MJ. Attention and working memory deficits in mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Apr;32(4):350-7. doi: 10.1080/13803390903042379. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

    PMID: 19787522BACKGROUND
  • Johnson EL, Dewar CD, Solbakk AK, Endestad T, Meling TR, Knight RT. Bidirectional Frontoparietal Oscillatory Systems Support Working Memory. Curr Biol. 2017 Jun 19;27(12):1829-1835.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.046. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

    PMID: 28602658BACKGROUND
  • Roux F, Uhlhaas PJ. Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha-gamma versus theta-gamma codes for distinct WM information? Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jan;18(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

    PMID: 24268290BACKGROUND
  • Kornblith S, Buschman TJ, Miller EK. Stimulus Load and Oscillatory Activity in Higher Cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2016 Sep;26(9):3772-84. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv182. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

    PMID: 26286916BACKGROUND
  • Eldaief MC, Halko MA, Buckner RL, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates the brain's intrinsic activity in a frequency-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 27;108(52):21229-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113103109. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

    PMID: 22160708BACKGROUND
  • Anderkova L, Pizem D, Klobusiakova P, Gajdos M, Koritakova E, Rektorova I. Theta Burst Stimulation Enhances Connectivity of the Dorsal Attention Network in Young Healthy Subjects: An Exploratory Study. Neural Plast. 2018 Mar 13;2018:3106918. doi: 10.1155/2018/3106918. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29725346BACKGROUND
  • Novakova L, Gajdos M, Rektorova I. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation induced cognitive task-related decrease in activity of default mode network: An exploratory study. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):597-599. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 31. No abstract available.

    PMID: 32289683BACKGROUND
  • Plechata A, Sahula V, Fayette D, Fajnerova I. Age-Related Differences With Immersive and Non-immersive Virtual Reality in Memory Assessment. Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 11;10:1330. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01330. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31244729BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Dysfunction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Friedhelm C. Hummel

    Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Irena Rektorova

    CEITEC Masaryk University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2021

First Posted

August 3, 2021

Study Start

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

May 25, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Data will be shared only within both centres

Locations