NCT04984486|Active Not RecruitingDMC
Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
observational
138
1 country
1
Study Start
September 27, 2021
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
July 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
July 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Partial or total edentulousness has a significant impact on quality of life both functionally and aesthetically. TBR® Bone Level Implants allow the patient to prevent bone resorption and maintain facial tissue and musculature support. At the functional level, the patient who benefits from implant treatment regains normal masticatory function with all the benefits on the quality of life that this can bring him. Due to the osseointegration of the implant and the biocompatibility of the materials used, the implant treatment remains effective in the long term and makes it possible to maintain the aesthetics of the smile.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
July 21, 2021
Actual (reported)July 30, 2021
Actual (reported)September 27, 2021
Actual (reported)July 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
July 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
the success rate of tissue integration of the implant
Integration of the implant 15 years after implantation
15 years after implantation
Change of the quality of life of patients following the recovery of a complete dentition with the OHIP- 14 score (Oral Health Impact Profile)
5 years after implantation
Complication rate taking into account pain, local tenderness, infection, allergy, mobility of the implant, fracture
5 years after implantation
Measuring chewing function with occlusal assessment
5 years after implantation
Radiographic analysis of the osseointegration of the implant
5 years after implantation
Absence of inflammation (visual) and infection (radiographic)
5 years after implantation
The procedure used to accomplish its intended use is as follows : * The recipient implant site is prepared using a drilling sequence, then the implant is placed at the crestal level * After a period of osseointegration of the implant, a transgingival healing screw is placed to allow the healing of soft tissues. After this healing phase, the final prosthesis will be loaded on the implant.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Patient partially or totally toothless
Cabinet du Dr ALLOUCHE
Montpellier, 34000, France
Laurent ALLOUCHE, Dr
Cabinet Dentaire du Dr Laurent ALLOUCHE
138 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
July 21, 2021
First Posted
July 30, 2021
Study Start
September 27, 2021
Actual (reported)Longitudinal Efficacy of Dental Implants in Anterior Areas
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
July 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
July 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Last Updated
April 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: