Guided Surgery Versus Sinus Graft
SINIMAGE
Clinical Assessment of Innovative Procedure Using Image-guided Surgery to Avoid Sinus Lift
SINIMAGE
Clinical Assessment of Innovative Procedure Using Image-guided Surgery to Avoid Sinus Lift
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Study Start
July 8, 2009
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
November 12, 2019
Actual (reported)Study Completion
November 12, 2019
Actual (reported)The objective of this study is to compare two surgical procedure to place implant in severely resorbed posterioir part of the maxilla.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
November 12, 2019
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
July 8, 2009
Actual (reported)September 18, 2013
Actual (reported)November 20, 2013
Actual (reported)November 12, 2019
Actual (reported)November 12, 2019
Actual (reported)Treatment success
Treatment success is defined as followed : a "yes" must be obtain for the 4 following item. * Each implant are placed as planned (location and time) before surgery for each patient * Implant stability for each implant at follow-up stage * No radiolucent image around each implant * No pain no infection and paresthesia around each implant
2 years
Accuracy of the image guided system used
During surgery
Treatment success
5 years
Replacement of missing teeth
4 month after surgery
Angulation of implant
4 month after surgery
Cost of treatment
4 month after surgery
Image-guided implant placement
Sinus lift surgery : Patients receive sinus graft before implant placement
Placement on residual bone around the implant
Allograft bone
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Service de Consultations et Traitements Dentaires
Lyon, 69365, France
Almahrous G, David-Tchouda S, Sissoko A, Rancon N, Bosson JL, Fortin T. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Two Implant Placement Techniques in Sinus Region (Bone Graft versus Computer-Aided Implant Surgery): A Randomized Prospective Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 25;17(9):2990. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17092990.
Thomas FORTIN
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Service de Consultations et Traitements Dentaires
60 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
September 18, 2013
First Posted
November 20, 2013
Study Start
July 8, 2009
Actual (reported)Comparison of Masticatory Efficiency Between Complete Denture With Zero-degree Teeth and Anatomic Teeth in Patients With Severely Resorbed Ridge
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
November 12, 2019
Actual (reported)Study Completion
November 12, 2019
Actual (reported)Last Updated
September 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2020-06
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: