Longitudinal Efficacy of Dental Implants in Anterior Areas
Maximus
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the 3mm Maximus Dental Implant in Areas of Limited Tooth-to-tooth Spacing
1 other identifier
observational
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dental implants are used in dentistry to reestablish function and appearance to areas of the mouth where natural teeth are missing. Implants can be a good choice for almost all areas of the mouth except where the space left by missing teeth is too narrow. This is usually the case when front teeth are lost of have been missing since birth. The Maximus dental implant is the smallest implant made, just 3mm in diameter, and is especially designed to replace missing front teeth and yet be strong enough to function as a natural tooth. This study will assess the functional success of BioHorizons Maximus one-piece endosseous dental implant. We hypothesize that placement of the 3mm dental implant in areas of limited tooth-to-tooth spacing will be an efficacious tooth root replacement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2004
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2010
CompletedMarch 1, 2013
February 1, 2013
6.3 years
March 17, 2008
February 27, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
peri-implant bone support
5 years following prosthetic attachment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Aesthetics and function
5 years following prosthectic attachment
Eligibility Criteria
Dental clinic
You may qualify if:
- Missing anterior teeth
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Cigarette smoking
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Other significant medical conditions or habits likely to compromise bone healing
- Chronic use of medications likely to compromise bone healing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Alabama at Birminghamlead
- BioHorizons, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294 0007, United States
Related Publications (9)
Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100. doi: 10.3109/02844316909036699. No abstract available.
PMID: 4924041BACKGROUNDAdell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4.
PMID: 6809663BACKGROUNDAdell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Winter;5(4):347-59.
PMID: 2094653BACKGROUNDAlbrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, Feldmann G, Freiberg N, Glantz PO, Kjellman O, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol. 1988 May;59(5):287-96. doi: 10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287.
PMID: 3290429BACKGROUNDAlbrektsson T. On long-term maintenance of the osseointegrated response. Aust Prosthodont J. 1993;7 Suppl:15-24.
PMID: 8054223BACKGROUNDEngquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988 Summer;3(2):129-34. No abstract available.
PMID: 3075194BACKGROUNDJemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Fall;4(3):211-7.
PMID: 2700745BACKGROUNDBuser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Jun;8(3):161-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x.
PMID: 9586460BACKGROUNDWedgwood D, Jennings KJ, Critchlow HA, Watkinson AC, Shepherd JP, Frame JW, Laird WR, Quayle AA. Experience with ITI osseointegrated implants at five centres in the UK. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Dec;30(6):377-81. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(92)90204-v.
PMID: 1450160BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael S Reddy, DMD, DMSc
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dean, School of Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2008
First Posted
March 24, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2004
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 1, 2010
Last Updated
March 1, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-02