NCT00641277|Completed
Longitudinal Efficacy of Dental Implants in Anterior Areas
Maximus
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the 3mm Maximus Dental Implant in Areas of Limited Tooth-to-tooth Spacing
Loading search results
Maximus
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the 3mm Maximus Dental Implant in Areas of Limited Tooth-to-tooth Spacing
Sponsor study identifier
observational
15
1 country
1
Study Start
March 2004
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
July 2010
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 2010
Actual (reported)Dental implants are used in dentistry to reestablish function and appearance to areas of the mouth where natural teeth are missing. Implants can be a good choice for almost all areas of the mouth except where the space left by missing teeth is too narrow. This is usually the case when front teeth are lost of have been missing since birth. The Maximus dental implant is the smallest implant made, just 3mm in diameter, and is especially designed to replace missing front teeth and yet be strong enough to function as a natural tooth. This study will assess the functional success of BioHorizons Maximus one-piece endosseous dental implant. We hypothesize that placement of the 3mm dental implant in areas of limited tooth-to-tooth spacing will be an efficacious tooth root replacement.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 2010
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
March 2004
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
March 17, 2008
Actual (reported)March 24, 2008
Actual (reported)July 2010
Actual (reported)July 2010
Actual (reported)peri-implant bone support
5 years following prosthetic attachment
Aesthetics and function
5 years following prosthectic attachment
Dental clinic
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294 0007, United States
Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100. doi: 10.3109/02844316909036699. No abstract available.
Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4.
Michael S Reddy, DMD, DMSc
University of Alabama at Birmingham
15 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
March 17, 2008
First Posted
March 24, 2008
Study Start
March 2004
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Mandibular Single Implant Overdenture: a Prospective Clinical Trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Winter;5(4):347-59.
Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, Feldmann G, Freiberg N, Glantz PO, Kjellman O, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol. 1988 May;59(5):287-96. doi: 10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287.
Albrektsson T. On long-term maintenance of the osseointegrated response. Aust Prosthodont J. 1993;7 Suppl:15-24.
Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988 Summer;3(2):129-34. No abstract available.
Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Fall;4(3):211-7.
Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Jun;8(3):161-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x.
Wedgwood D, Jennings KJ, Critchlow HA, Watkinson AC, Shepherd JP, Frame JW, Laird WR, Quayle AA. Experience with ITI osseointegrated implants at five centres in the UK. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Dec;30(6):377-81. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(92)90204-v.
Primary Completion
July 2010
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 2010
Actual (reported)Last Updated
March 1, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-02
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: