Effectiveness of a Self-guided Mobile Application in Improving Wellbeing and Stress Coping
Can a Self-guided Program on a Mobile Application Improve Wellbeing and Stress Coping? - A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
323
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Excessive and chronic stress is a major public global health concern. Young adults are at particular risk to experience heightened stress because of life transitions. Short skills-focused self-guided applications (SGA) on mobile phones are a cost-effective and scalable way to equip users with better stress-coping skills, but many SGA stress-coping programmes are not evidence-based, existing research is flawed with methodological problems and is also predominantly conducted in Western countries. Questions also remain for whom SGAs work (moderators) and by which pathways (mediators). This study is a randomised-controlled trial (RCT) that evaluates the effectiveness of a recently developed mobile-phone SGA in improving stress coping in young adults. Hypothesis 1: The intervention group will report significantly lower stress symptoms at post-intervention and 1-month follow-up compared to the control group. Hypothesis 2: Coping self-efficacy will mediate the expected relationship between the use of the Stress-SGA and lower stress symptoms, i.e. people with higher coping self-efficacy will benefit more from the Stress-SGA than those with lower coping self-efficacy. Hypothesis 3: Psychological mindedness will moderate the expected relationship between the use of Stress-SGA and lower stress symptoms, i.e. people high in psychological mindedness will benefit more from the Stress-SGA than those with lower psychological mindedness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2022
CompletedApril 6, 2022
April 1, 2022
5 months
July 18, 2021
April 4, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of psychological stress
Psychological Stress Measure (PSM-9; Lemyre \& Tessier, 1988) is used to measure the affective, cognitive, behavioural, and somatic components of psychological stress. This is a 9-item self-report measure utilising a 8-point scale (1 = 'Not at all', 8 = 'Extremely'). Some examples of the items include "I feel calm" and "I feel a great weight on my shoulders". Low ratings on items 1 and 6 and high ratings on the other items demonstrate greater symptomatology. When calculating for the total score, the opposite value of the rating will be given to items 1 and 6, where a rating of 1 = 8 points and conversely, a rating of 8 = 1 point. This results in higher total scores reflecting more stress symptoms. The PSM-9 is found to have excellent internal consistency where Cronbach׳s α = .89.
Baseline, 8 days (completion of intervention), 4 weeks (follow-up)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in depressive symptoms
Baseline, 8 days (completion of intervention), 4 weeks (follow-up)
Change in generalised anxiety
Baseline, 8 days (completion of intervention), 4 weeks (follow-up)
Change in coping self-efficacy
Baseline, 8 days (completion of intervention), 4 weeks (follow-up)
Psychological mindedness
Baseline
Other Outcomes (1)
Engagement with the mobile application
8 days (completion of intervention)
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group: Stress-coping Program
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will complete an 8-day self-guided programme on stress-coping delivered via a mobile-phone application with daily exercises guided by cognitive-behavioural principles.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will complete an 8-day self-guided programme on cooperation delivered via a mobile-phone application with daily exercises that differ to the intervention group in terms of content but are comparable in terms of duration.
Interventions
This is an 8-day program that provides psychoeducation on the negative effects of stress and effective stress-management skills to combat stress. Guided by principles of CBT, the program targets the thoughts and behaviours of participants and equips them with skills to alter negative cognitions pertaining to stress. Participants are engaging with a series of exercises involving reflection and mindfulness where they are required to spot and write down their stressors, the negative thoughts associated with the stressors, as well as positive affirmations. Participants will also be taught breathing exercises and are encouraged to practice them during 2 check-ins.
The 8-day program on cooperation aims to provide psychoeducation for participants to understand and improve collaboration and interpersonal relationships. Short quizzes and practice exercises on feedback-giving will be included. The time and duration of the cooperation SGA is matched to the stress-coping SGA to ensure that participants spend a similar amount of time and effort across both the intervention and active-control conditions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-30
- Good command of the English Language
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- National University of Singaporelead
- Intellect Pte. Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
National University of Singapore
Singapore, Singapore
Related Publications (6)
Bakker D, Rickard N. Engagement in mobile phone app for self-monitoring of emotional wellbeing predicts changes in mental health: MoodPrism. J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:432-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.016. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
PMID: 29154165BACKGROUNDChesney MA, Neilands TB, Chambers DB, Taylor JM, Folkman S. A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. Br J Health Psychol. 2006 Sep;11(Pt 3):421-37. doi: 10.1348/135910705X53155.
PMID: 16870053BACKGROUNDConte HR, Plutchik R, Jung BB, Picard S, Karasu TB, Lotterman A. Psychological mindedness as a predictor of psychotherapy outcome: a preliminary report. Compr Psychiatry. 1990 Sep-Oct;31(5):426-31. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(90)90027-p.
PMID: 2225801BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDToh SHY, Tan JHY, Kosasih FR, Sundermann O. Efficacy of the Mental Health App Intellect to Reduce Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial With a 1-Month Follow-up. JMIR Form Res. 2022 Dec 14;6(12):e40723. doi: 10.2196/40723.
PMID: 36515984DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oliver Suendermann, Ph.D.
National University of Singapore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Director Master in Clinical Psychology Program
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2021
First Posted
July 27, 2021
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
February 1, 2022
Study Completion
February 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share