Acceptability and Feasibility of Home-based TB Testing
Investigating the Acceptability and Feasibility of Home-based TB Testing of Household Contacts Using a New, Mobile Point-of-care Technology
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the utility of home-based point-of-care TB testing for early diagnosis and linkage to care of household contacts of TB patients, addressing the need for active case finding and early detection of infectious TB. The investigators propose an exploratory study to 1) investigate the acceptability and feasibility of home-based TB testing of household contacts using a new portable GeneXpert point-of-care (PoC) platform, and 2) determine the potential impact of such a home-based testing program on early detection of TB disease and linkage-to-care (LTC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2021
CompletedJuly 22, 2021
July 1, 2021
11 months
June 30, 2021
July 20, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Acceptability of home-based TB testing
≥ 80% of individuals who screen positive for TB consent to home-based testing using the GeneXpert Platform.
Within 1 hour
Feasibility of home-based TB testing
≥80% of households visited having a safe space for sputum production. A safe space for sputum production and collection will be defined as per the South African 2014 National TB Management Guidelines.
Within 1 hour
Feasibility of home-based TB testing
\>90% of MTB/Rif tests produce a valid test result
Immediate upon test completion
Feasibility of home-based TB testing
≥ 80% of household contacts testing positive for TB present at a clinic for care and treatment
Within 4 weeks of diagnosis
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of referral uptake
Within 30 days
Time to clinic presentation
Within 30 days
Time-to-treatment initiation
Within 30 days
Proportion initiating treatment
Within 30 days
Study Arms (2)
Home-based GeneXpert TB test
EXPERIMENTALScreening household contacts + home-based GeneXpert® MTB/RIF TB testing for those with TB symptoms + immediate referral for clinic-based treatment initiation.
Standard home-based TB symptom screening with immediate referral
NO INTERVENTIONScreening household contacts + immediate referral for clinic-based TB testing
Interventions
Those who screen positive for TB using the standard 4-question screener will be offered a GeneXpert® \[Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA\] MTB/RIF test in their home with referral for clinic-based TB treatment initiation for those who receive a positive MTB/RIF test result.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- TB symptomatic household contact of a TB patient
- Not currently on TB treatment
- Able to produce a sputum specimen for testing
- Age ≥18 years
- Provision of written consent
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to speak and answer questions in English, Xhosa or Afrikaans
- Household contact has already been to the facility for TB testing or is already on TB treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Foundation for Professional Development (Pty) Ltdlead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)collaborator
- Medical Research Council, South Africacollaborator
- Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerlandcollaborator
- University of Witwatersrand, South Africacollaborator
- University of California, Irvinecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Buffalo City Metro
East London, Eastern Cape, 5217, South Africa
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Medina-Marino, PhD
andrewmedinamarino@gmail.com
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The allocation of study arm is concealed to study staff during randomization. Neither study staff nor participants will be blinded to study treatment arms after the point of randomization. Nonetheless, strict policies will be in place to preserve randomization integrity.
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2021
First Posted
July 22, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
May 31, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2019
Last Updated
July 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Supporting information will be made available as requested 1) in parallel with manuscript publication or 2) within two years of study completion (whichever comes earlier)
Data will be made available on public repository 1) in parallel with manuscript publication or 2) within two years of study completion (whichever comes earlier)