NCT04954508|CompletedDMC
Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
January 31, 2014
Actual (reported)Study Completion
January 31, 2014
Actual (reported)We developed a new test, the "hug-up test," wherein elevation is resisted as the palm is held on the opposite shoulder with the elbow held in maximal anterior translation. The purpose of this study was to describe the hug-up test and compare it with other conventional tests used for diagnosing supraspinatus tears.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
January 31, 2014
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
December 1, 2012
Actual (reported)January 31, 2014
Actual (reported)January 31, 2014
Actual (reported)July 5, 2021
Actual (reported)July 8, 2021
Actual (reported)patients' self-reported pain
Pain experienced during the Neer impingement and Hawkins-Kennedy impingement tests and weakness during the EC test and the FC test were considered positive results.
immediately after the test
diagnostic arthroscopy
The arthroscopic operation involved complete inspection of the supraspinatus. Supraspinatus tears were categorized as fullthickness tears (FTTs), which were classified as small (≤1 cm), moderate (≤3 cm), large (≤5 cm), and massive (\>5 cm), on the basis of the largest dimension, and partial-thickness tears (PTTs), which were classified as bursal-sided, articular-sided,and intra-tendinous. Other combined diseases including acromioclavicular joint derangement, infraspinatus lesions, subscapularis lesions, superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions, biceps disorders, and Bankart lesions were recorded as well to assess the specificity of the tests.the supraspinatus. Supraspinatus tears were categorized as fullthickness tears (FTTs), which were classified as small (≤1 cm), moderate (≤3 cm), large (≤5 cm), and massive (\>5 cm), on the basis of the largest dimension, and partial-thickness tears (PTTs), which were classified as bursal-sided, articular-sided,
during the arthrosocpic procedure
patients suffering form shoulder pain and/or weakness or dislication
It is a new physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
200 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo an arthroscopic procedure for a diagnosis related to shoulder pain and/or weakness or dislocation by one of the senior authors.
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
Yulei Liu
Peking University Third Hospital
200 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
July 5, 2021
First Posted
July 8, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Actual (reported)A Clinical Research on Repair of Massive-large Rotator Cuff Tears
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
The arthroscopic operation involved complete inspection of the supraspinatus. Supraspinatus tears were categorized as fullthickness tears (FTTs), which were classified as small (≤1 cm), moderate (≤3 cm), large (≤5 cm), and massive (\>5 cm), on the basis of the largest dimension, and partial-thickness tears (PTTs), which were classified as bursal-sided, articular-sided,and intra-tendinous. Other combined diseases including acromioclavicular joint derangement, infraspinatus lesions, subscapularis lesions, superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions, biceps disorders, and Bankart lesions were recorded as well to assess the specificity of the tests.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
January 31, 2014
Actual (reported)Study Completion
January 31, 2014
Actual (reported)Last Updated
July 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: