NCT04825249

Brief Summary

We aimed to introduce a new modified suture bridge technique and report the clinical outcomes and radiological assessments of modified suture bridge technique for medium rotator cuff tears.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 30, 2018

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 2, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 5, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 29, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 1, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

March 29, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 29, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

rotator cuff tear, modified suture bridge technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Cuff integrity grade of MRI assessment

    Grade I: sufficient thickness of tendon; Grade II: sufficient thickness of tendon and partial high intensity within tendon; Grade III: insufficient thickness of tendon without discontinuity; Grade IV: slight discontinuity in 1 or 2 images of oblique coronal plane and sagittal plane; Grade V:obvious discontinuity of tendons in more than 2 images of both oblique coronal plane and sagittal plane.

    at 12 months postoperatively

  • Muscle atrophy grade of MRI assessment

    Grade I: a ratio between 1.00 and 0.60 can be considered as normal or slightly atrophied; Grade II: values between 0.60 and 0.40 suggest moderate atrophy. Grade III: values below 0.40 indicate serious or severe atrophy.

    at 12 months postoperatively

  • Fatty degeneration grade of MRI assessment

    Grade 0: completely normal muscle; Grade 1: muscle contains some fatty streaks; Grade 2: there is more muscle than fat; Grade 3: equal distribution of fat and muscle; grade 4: more fat was present than muscle. Among them, grade 0 is normal, grade 1 and 2 are considered moderate, grade 3 and 4 are classified as severe.

    at 12 months postoperatively

  • Range of shoulder motion

    Different range of motion of shoulder joint

    at 12 months postoperatively

  • The Visual Analog Scale score

    Assess pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

    preoperatively

  • The Visual Analog Scale score

    Assess pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

    at 12 months postoperatively

  • University of California-Los Angeles score

    The score mainly consists of two parts. Patients subjectively evaluate pain and functional activity; and doctors objectively evaluate shoulder joint mobility and muscle strength. Possible scores range from 0 to 35, a higher score means a better result.

    preoperatively

  • University of California-Los Angeles score

    The score mainly consists of two parts. Patients subjectively evaluate pain and functional activity; and doctors objectively evaluate shoulder joint mobility and muscle strength. Possible scores range from 0 to 35, a higher score means a better result.

    at 12 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Constant-Murray Shoulder score

    preoperatively

  • Constant-Murray Shoulder score

    at 12 months postoperatively

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score

    preoperatively

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score

    at 12 months postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

The traditional suture bridge technique group

EXPERIMENTAL

For the TSB group, if the tear type is confirmed to be medium-sized during the operation, TSB technique will be performed

Procedure: traditional suture bridge technique

The modified suture bridge technique group

EXPERIMENTAL

For the MSB group, if the tear type is confirmed to be medium-sized during the operation, TSB technique will be performed

Procedure: modified suture bridge technique

Interventions

(A) Limbs of the sutures from the medial anchor were passed through torn tendon (B) the suture limbs were tied in a horizontal mattress suture pattern (C) the lateral row pressed the free tails of the knotted line on the greater tubercle of the humerus (D) the effect after completion of the TSB technique

The traditional suture bridge technique group

(A) Limbs of the sutures from the medial anchor and 2 tendon sutures were passed through the same position of torn tendon (B) the lateral row pressed free tails of the two tendon lines on the greater tubercle of the humerus (C) after examination of sufficient tension and stable fixation, sutures of medial row was knotted (D) the effect after completion of the MSB technique

The modified suture bridge technique group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • (1) full-thickness medium tears (1-3cm) of primary supraspinatus (SSP) tendon was identified on preoperative MRI and intraoperative arthroscopy, (2) undesirable conservative treatment for 3 months, (3)completed follow-up of 12 months postoperatively and patients who adhered to the rehabilitation plan.

You may not qualify if:

  • (1) previous shoulder surgery, (2) Other pathological changes that would need to be addressed at the time of arthroscopic surgery, such as rotator cuff tear involving the subscapular (SSC) tendon,biceps tendon injury, (3) failure to follow our postoperative rehabilitation protocol and patients without regular follow-up.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

Shangdong, China

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Takeuchi Y, Sugaya H, Takahashi N, Matsuki K, Tokai M, Morioka T, Ueda Y, Hoshika S. Repair Integrity and Retear Pattern After Arthroscopic Medial Knot-Tying After Suture-Bridge Lateral Row Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Aug;48(10):2510-2517. doi: 10.1177/0363546520934786. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

  • Kim KC, Shin HD, Lee WY, Yeon KW, Han SC. Clinical outcomes and repair integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture-bridge technique with or without medial tying: prospective comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Aug 28;13(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0921-z.

  • Dukan R, Ledinot P, Donadio J, Boyer P. Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With a Knotless Suture Bridge Technique: Functional and Radiological Outcomes After a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years. Arthroscopy. 2019 Jul;35(7):2003-2011. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.02.028. Epub 2019 May 27.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • Tengbo Yu

    The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Whereas patients and surgeons were aware of the group assignments, the outcome assessors and data analysts were remained blinded during the study period.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2021

First Posted

April 1, 2021

Study Start

December 30, 2018

Primary Completion

December 2, 2020

Study Completion

January 5, 2021

Last Updated

April 1, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices)

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication
Access Criteria
Proposals should be directed to zhangsports2021@sina.com. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data are available for 5 years at a third party website
More information

Locations