Prediction of Recovery in Patients With Neck Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prognostic prediction model will be a reference for the health care professionals in clinical decision making and subsequent outcomes in dealing with patients having sub-acute and chronic neck pain, as well as, it will be a guide regarding therapeutic management and patients' education. Although various studies have evaluated the prognostic factors for individual neck pain conditions or treatment, to author Knowledge, no such prognostic model is available yet that predict the recovery in patients of sub-acute and chronic neck pain when managed conservatively. Therefore, this study is aimed to create a prediction model suggesting the recovery time for neck pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2022
CompletedFebruary 7, 2022
February 1, 2022
11 months
May 19, 2021
February 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Numeric pain rating scale
The Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is a self-reported, or clinician-administered, measurement tool consisting of a numerical point scale with extreme anchors of 'no pain' to 'extreme pain. The scale is typically set up on a horizontal or vertical line, ranges most commonly from 0-10 or 0-100, and can be administered in written or verbal form. The patient is asked to rate his/her pain intensity and a particular time frame or descriptor is established (e.g. within the last 24 h, today, worst pain, average pain, or least pain). The NPRS scores are high on ease of administration and simplicity for scoring. The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.
Up to 2 months
Neck disability index
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures a patient's self-reported neck pain-related disability. The NDI is the most widely used, translated and oldest questionnaire for neck pain. Questions include activities of daily living, such as personal care, lifting, reading, work, driving, sleeping, recreational activities, pain intensity, concentration and headache. Each question is measured on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 5, and an overall score out of 100 is calculated by adding each item score together and multiplying it by two. A higher NDI score means the greater a patient's perceived disability due to neck pain. The "minimally clinically important change" by patients has been found to be 5 or 10%. The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.
Up to 2 months
Range of Motion
Goniometric measurements are used by physical therapists to quantify baseline limitations of motion, decide on appropriate therapeutic interventions, and document the effectiveness of these interventions. Goniometry can be considered a fundamental part of the "basic science" of physical therapy. To most physical therapists, however, the universal goniometer (i.e. full-circle manual goniometer) remains the most versatile and widely used instrument in clinical practice. The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.
Up to 2 months
Manual muscle testing for strength of cervical muscle
Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale is the most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength. This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly; 0 means no muscle activation, 1 means trace muscle activation, such as a twitch, without achieving full Range of Motion (ROM), 2 means muscle activation with gravity eliminated, achieving full ROM, 3 means muscle activation against gravity, full ROM, 4 means muscle activation against some resistance, full ROM, 5 means muscle activation against examiner's full resistance, full ROM. The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.
Up to 2 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain Anxiety symptom scale
Up to 2 months
Study Arms (2)
Follow-up on daily basis
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient receiving treatments on daily basis (5 days a week)
Follow-up on alternate days
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receiving treatment on alternate days (3 days a week)
Interventions
Conventionally used intervention for subacute and chronic neck pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subacute and chronic neck pain.
- Patients with neck pain with a score of 4-10 on the numeric pain rating scale.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute neck pain.
- Neck pain due to fracture, tumour, infection or metabolic bone disease.
- History of cervical spine injury or surgery.
- Patients presented with disc herniation.
- Cervical instability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences
Mansehra, KPK, 21300, Pakistan
Related Publications (2)
Cai C, Ming G, Ng LY. Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain who are likely to benefit from home-based mechanical cervical traction. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):912-22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1673-6. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
PMID: 21240529BACKGROUNDSleijser-Koehorst MLS, Coppieters MW, Heymans MW, Rooker S, Verhagen AP, Scholten-Peeters GGM. Clinical course and prognostic models for the conservative management of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2710-2719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5777-8. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
PMID: 30327908BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Imran Amjad, PhD
Riphah International University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2021
First Posted
June 14, 2021
Study Start
June 15, 2021
Primary Completion
April 30, 2022
Study Completion
April 30, 2022
Last Updated
February 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share