NCT04924764

Brief Summary

This prognostic prediction model will be a reference for the health care professionals in clinical decision making and subsequent outcomes in dealing with patients having sub-acute and chronic neck pain, as well as, it will be a guide regarding therapeutic management and patients' education. Although various studies have evaluated the prognostic factors for individual neck pain conditions or treatment, to author Knowledge, no such prognostic model is available yet that predict the recovery in patients of sub-acute and chronic neck pain when managed conservatively. Therefore, this study is aimed to create a prediction model suggesting the recovery time for neck pain.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 19, 2021

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 14, 2021

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2021

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 7, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

May 19, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Prediction Modelneck painrecoverychronicsub acute

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Numeric pain rating scale

    The Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is a self-reported, or clinician-administered, measurement tool consisting of a numerical point scale with extreme anchors of 'no pain' to 'extreme pain. The scale is typically set up on a horizontal or vertical line, ranges most commonly from 0-10 or 0-100, and can be administered in written or verbal form. The patient is asked to rate his/her pain intensity and a particular time frame or descriptor is established (e.g. within the last 24 h, today, worst pain, average pain, or least pain). The NPRS scores are high on ease of administration and simplicity for scoring. The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.

    Up to 2 months

  • Neck disability index

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures a patient's self-reported neck pain-related disability. The NDI is the most widely used, translated and oldest questionnaire for neck pain. Questions include activities of daily living, such as personal care, lifting, reading, work, driving, sleeping, recreational activities, pain intensity, concentration and headache. Each question is measured on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 5, and an overall score out of 100 is calculated by adding each item score together and multiplying it by two. A higher NDI score means the greater a patient's perceived disability due to neck pain. The "minimally clinically important change" by patients has been found to be 5 or 10%. The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.

    Up to 2 months

  • Range of Motion

    Goniometric measurements are used by physical therapists to quantify baseline limitations of motion, decide on appropriate therapeutic interventions, and document the effectiveness of these interventions. Goniometry can be considered a fundamental part of the "basic science" of physical therapy. To most physical therapists, however, the universal goniometer (i.e. full-circle manual goniometer) remains the most versatile and widely used instrument in clinical practice. The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.

    Up to 2 months

  • Manual muscle testing for strength of cervical muscle

    Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale is the most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength. This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly; 0 means no muscle activation, 1 means trace muscle activation, such as a twitch, without achieving full Range of Motion (ROM), 2 means muscle activation with gravity eliminated, achieving full ROM, 3 means muscle activation against gravity, full ROM, 4 means muscle activation against some resistance, full ROM, 5 means muscle activation against examiner's full resistance, full ROM. The last reading will be taken when the NPRS score will be less than 3.

    Up to 2 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Anxiety symptom scale

    Up to 2 months

Study Arms (2)

Follow-up on daily basis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patient receiving treatments on daily basis (5 days a week)

Other: Conventional physical therapy.

Follow-up on alternate days

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients receiving treatment on alternate days (3 days a week)

Other: Conventional physical therapy.

Interventions

Conventionally used intervention for subacute and chronic neck pain.

Follow-up on alternate daysFollow-up on daily basis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Subacute and chronic neck pain.
  • Patients with neck pain with a score of 4-10 on the numeric pain rating scale.

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute neck pain.
  • Neck pain due to fracture, tumour, infection or metabolic bone disease.
  • History of cervical spine injury or surgery.
  • Patients presented with disc herniation.
  • Cervical instability

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences

Mansehra, KPK, 21300, Pakistan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • Cai C, Ming G, Ng LY. Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain who are likely to benefit from home-based mechanical cervical traction. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):912-22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1673-6. Epub 2011 Jan 15.

    PMID: 21240529BACKGROUND
  • Sleijser-Koehorst MLS, Coppieters MW, Heymans MW, Rooker S, Verhagen AP, Scholten-Peeters GGM. Clinical course and prognostic models for the conservative management of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2710-2719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5777-8. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

    PMID: 30327908BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck PainRadiculopathyBronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesOrganizing PneumoniaBronchiolitis ObliteransBronchiolitisBronchitisBronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesGraft vs Host DiseaseImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Imran Amjad, PhD

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2021

First Posted

June 14, 2021

Study Start

June 15, 2021

Primary Completion

April 30, 2022

Study Completion

April 30, 2022

Last Updated

February 7, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations