Pharmacological Mechanisms of Low-intensity Focused Ultrasound for Motor Cortex Neuroplasticity
LIFUS-Pharma
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUS) has been shown to be an effective and safe non-invasive brain stimulation technique, capable of reaching greater brain depth and a greater spatial resolution than other brain stimulation tools. Its use as a potential clinical tool for treatment of neurological disorders is reliant on an understanding of its mechanisms of action. Although it has been shown to induce immediate (online) and prolonged (offline) changes in plasticity in the motor cortex, researchers have not studied its effects on neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels responsible for neuronal signaling in humans. The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of online and offline LIFUS stimulation in tandem with administration of various brain-active drugs, to elucidate the effects of this technique on specific cortical receptors and channels. 20 healthy, screened subjects will be recruited to participate in 5 sessions in-lab. Each session will represent the double-blinded administration of four known and studied pharmacological agents known to safely induce changes in the motor cortex, as well as a placebo. Investigators will use carbamazepine (sodium channel blocker), lorazepam (GABAA positive allosteric modulator), nimodipine (calcium channel blocker), and dextromethorphan (glutamate N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist). Single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures will be recorded for online LIFUS before and after drug intervention, and induction of offline LIFUS during placebo will be compared with its induction following the various drug interventions. Investigators predict that due to the differential effects of online and offline LIFUS on motor parameters, the mechanisms in which it alters the receptors and channels of interest will also be differentially modulated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1
Started May 2021
Longer than P75 for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedAugust 3, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.1 years
May 25, 2021
July 30, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Motor Evoked Potential
1 mV peak-to-peak MEP (motor evoked potential), defined as the average TMS stimulation intensity required to elicit a 1-mV EMG response in the right hand muscle. We will compare the intensities required to elicit this response within all of our pharmacological and FUS interventions, compared to our sham/placebo FUS intervention.
2 years
Resting Motor Threshold
• The resting motor threshold (RMT) is defined as the minimum stimulus intensity that elicits an MEP greater than or equal to 50 microvolts in at least 5 out of 10 trials in the relaxed right FDI. We will compare the RMT required to elicit this response within all of our pharmacological and FUS interventions, compared to our sham/placebo FUS intervention.
2 years
Recruitment Curve
• The MEP recruitment curve is a dose-response curve for assessing the effects of TMS stimulation intensity on recorded MEP. TMS stimulation begin at sub-RMT levels (80-90%) and is increased in increments of 10%. During this, MEP response is recorded from the right FDI, and a graph may then be created by fitting data-points into a sigmoidal curve. Recruitment curves will be compared in-between sham and real FUS, and in-between our various pharmacological interventions to observe changes in cortical neuron activation.
2 years
Short Interval Intracortical Inhibition
• Short Interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) will be obtained on a relaxed right FDI muscle using paired-pulse TMS. SICI involves a subthreshold conditioning stimulus (CS) at 80% of RMT followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus (TS) at an intensity able to evoke an average MEP of \~1mV, at an interstimulus interval of 2ms. The magnitude of SICI will be indexed by the ratio of the mean conditioned MEP amplitude over the mean unconditioned MEP amplitude. A ratio less than 1 indicates greater inhibition and less facilitation.
2 years
Intracortical Facilitation
• Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) will be obtained on a relaxed right FDI muscle using paired-pulse TMS. ICF involves a subthreshold conditioning stimulus (CS) at 80% of RMT followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus (TS) at an intensity able to evoke an average MEP of \~1mV, at an interstimulus interval of 10ms. The magnitude of ICF will be indexed by the ratio of the mean conditioned MEP amplitude over the mean unconditioned MEP amplitude. A ratio greater than 1 indicates greater facilitation and less inhibition.
2 years
Study Arms (1)
LIFUS
EXPERIMENTALLow Intensity Focussed ultrasound.
Interventions
150 mgmg reconstituted as one table. Administered once
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Right-handed healthy subjects between the ages of 18-65 will be included for recruitment.
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed with any gait or postural disorders
- Major neurological disease or disorder
- Major musculoskeletal or nerve disorder, or disorder of hands, wrists and upper limbs
- History of stroke or seizure
- Diagnosed with dementia
- Diagnosed with myasthenia gravis or acute narrow angle glaucoma
- Has intracranial implant(s) or device(s)
- Has an implanted cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)
- Presence of metal implanted in body that is contraindicated in TMS
- Caffeine or chocolate consumption 1-2 hours before study sessions
- Consumption of grapefruit juice 24 hours before study sessions
- Alcohol consumption 24 hours before study sessions
- Pregnancy\*
- Major depression/psychiatric disorder that in the opinion of the Investigator will affect patient's understanding of study procedures and willingness to abide by all procedures during the course of the study
- Regular usage of CNS active drugs or calcium channel blockers during or up to 2 weeks before participating in the study\*\*
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Chen, MBBS
University Health Network, Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Healthy Controls 18-80 years
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Neurologist and Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2021
First Posted
June 11, 2021
Study Start
May 25, 2021
Primary Completion
July 10, 2022
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
August 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share