NCT04902430

Brief Summary

There's a scarcity in literature concerning en-masse retraction and its effect on the rate of tooth movement. The purpose of this study is to determine, In orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion, which form of mechanics in en-masse retraction offers a faster rate of retraction; Friction or Frictionless Mechanics.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 29, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2021

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 26, 2021

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 18, 2022

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 12, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 7, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

May 12, 2021

Last Update Submit

December 6, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

En-masse RetractionFrictionFricitionlessLateral CephalometricRateDental Models

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Retraction Rate

    The antero-posterior movement of anterior teeth and first molars will be assessed by measuring the digitilized study models taken of the patients monthly (measured in mm)

    From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Anchorage Loss

    From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)

  • Molar Rotation

    From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)

  • Pain of intervention

    From pre to post retraction/intervention (an average of 6 - 8 months)

  • Anterior teeth torque, extrusion/intrusion

    From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)

Study Arms (2)

En-Masse Retraction using sliding mechanics (Friction)

EXPERIMENTAL

6 anterior teeth (en-Masse) retracted using a crimpable hook distal to the upper lateral incisor and a power chain

Procedure: Power chain and Crimpable hook for En-Masse Retraction

En-Masse Retraction using segmental mechanics (Frictionless)

EXPERIMENTAL

6 anterior teeth (en-Masse) retracted using a T- loop

Procedure: T- Loop

Interventions

Retraction will start on a 0.017"x0.025" Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 212 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the miniscrew

En-Masse Retraction using sliding mechanics (Friction)
T- LoopPROCEDURE

Closing retraction T-loops will be fabricated using 0.017 x 0.025 TMA wire. The loop will be positioned halfway the extraction space and the canine

En-Masse Retraction using segmental mechanics (Frictionless)

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years - 24 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults and Adolescent patients (both genders)
  • Age range (14-24)
  • Patients with maxillary protrusion requiring first premolars extraction (Bimaxillary Protrusion or Class II division 1 cases).
  • Patients with fully erupted permanent teeth (not necessarily including the third molar).
  • Cases requiring maximum anchorage during retraction.
  • Good general and oral health

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients suffering from any systemic diseases interfering with tooth movement.
  • Patients with extracted or missing permanent teeth. (except for third molars).
  • Patients with badly decayed teeth.
  • Patients with any parafunctional habits (i.e. Bruxism, tongue thrusting, mouth breathing, etc…).
  • Patients with previous orthodontic treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Future University in Egypt

New Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt

Location

Study Officials

  • Yehia Mostafa, Professor and Chairman

    Future University in Egypt

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Only the outcome assessors will be blind. The patients name will be sealed from pre and post radiographs and study models. Then two assessors will carry out, blindly and independently, the measurements and analysis of the study
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2021

First Posted

May 26, 2021

Study Start

December 29, 2020

Primary Completion

July 18, 2022

Study Completion

August 12, 2022

Last Updated

December 7, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All collected IPD

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Data will be available after publication

Locations