NCT04892056

Brief Summary

The rate of anterior segment retraction in bi-maxillary protrusion cases was evaluated comparing the friction and friction-less mechanics. since, there has been a lack of clear cut guidelines for clinicians for the optimum method for retraction, this randomized clinical trial was done.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2019

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 10, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 15, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 27, 2021

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 19, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 19, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

April 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 13, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

T loopsFrictionFrictionlesspower chainsdigital modelsanterior segment retraction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of Anterior Segment Retraction

    The rate of anterior segment retraction per month was measured on monthly digital models.

    The start of anterior segment retraction up to complete space closure, an average of 6 months.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Anchorage Loss

    The start of anterior segment retraction up to complete space closure, an average of 6 months.

  • Pain experienced after each activation of the two mechanics

    The start of anterior segment retraction up to complete space closure, an average of 6 months.

Study Arms (2)

Anterior Segment Retraction using Friction mechanics by elastomeric power chains

EXPERIMENTAL

Elastomeric power chains extending from 8mm crimpable hooks, distal to the lateral incisors, on 0.017"x0.025" Stainless Steel WIres, to the mini-screws. The power chains delivered 160g of force per side.

Other: Friction Mechanics

Anterior Segment Retraction using Frictionless mechanics by T-loops

EXPERIMENTAL

T shaped closing loops were fabricated on 0.017"x0.025" Titanium- Molybdenum wires (TMA) were used to deliver 160g of force per side by 4mm distal activations.

Other: Frictionless Mechanics

Interventions

anterior segment retraction using elastomeric power chains

Also known as: sliding mechanics
Anterior Segment Retraction using Friction mechanics by elastomeric power chains

anterior segment retraction using closing loops

Also known as: segmented mechanics
Anterior Segment Retraction using Frictionless mechanics by T-loops

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 25 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Female Subjects.
  • Age 13-25 y of age.
  • Skeletal Angle Class I malocclusion with Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in need of four 1st premolar extractions with maximum anchorage.
  • Fully erupted permanent dentition without crowding.
  • Good oral and general health.

You may not qualify if:

  • Systemic Diseases or syndromes or on anti-inflammatory medication.
  • Extracted or missing permanent teeth.
  • History of previous Orthodontic Treatment.
  • Parafunctional Habits.
  • Badly decayed teeth.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Future Univeristy in Egypt

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Study Officials

  • Yehia Mostafa, Chairman

    Future Univeristy in Egypt

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Blinding of the principal investigator was not possible due to the nature of the interventions. However, the outcome assessor was blinded to the interventions and all digital models were unidentified during outcome assessment.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2021

First Posted

May 19, 2021

Study Start

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion

June 10, 2020

Study Completion

December 15, 2020

Last Updated

May 19, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All collected IPD shared.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
After Publication

Locations