Bimaxillary Protrusion
16
0
1
9
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 16 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 9 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 9 completed trials
Clinical Trials (16)
LLLLT vs Piezocision in Accelerating Orthodontic Canine Retraction
Effect of an AI Prediction Model of Facial Changes After Orthodontic Treatment of Patients With Bimaxillary Protrusion
Evaluation of the Rate of En-masse Retraction in Orthodontic Patients With Maxillary Protrusion
Effects of Flapless Laser Corticotomy in Canine Retraction
Evaluation of Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) During Orthodontic Canine Retraction
Effect Of Low Level Laser Therapy on the Rate of En- Masse Retraction: RCT
Evaluation of Mini and Macro-esthetics Following En- Masse Retraction Versus Two Step Retraction
Evaluation of the Anchorage Loss During En-masse Retraction in Orthodontic Patients With Maxillary Protrusion
Evaluation of Treatment Duration of En-masse Versus Two Steps Retraction in Patients Having Maxillary Protrusion
Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals
Evaluation of the Rate of Anterior Segment Retraction Using Two Types of Mechanics
Canine Retraction With Temporary Anchorage Devices
Evaluation of Incisors' Position Following Anterior Segment Retraction
Flapless Mops for Acceleration of Canine Retraction
3D Comparison of Anterior Teeth Retraction and Anchorage Control Between En-masse and Two-step Mechanics
Evaluation of Smile Esthetics in Orthodontically Treated Patients With Bimaxillary-dentoalveolar Protrusion