Perceptual Training to Improve Listeners' Ability to Understand Speech Produced by Individuals With Dysarthria
Perceptual Training for Improved Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech
2 other identifiers
interventional
217
1 country
2
Brief Summary
There exist very few effective treatments that ease the intelligibility burden of dysarthria. Perceptual training offers a promising avenue for improving intelligibility of dysarthric speech by offsetting the communicative burden from the speaker with dysarthria on to their primary communication partners-family, friends, and caregivers. This project, utilizing advanced explanatory models, will permit identification of speaker and listener parameters, and their interactions, that allow perceptual training paradigms to be optimized for intelligibility outcomes in dysarthria rehabilitation. This work addresses this critical gap in clinical practice and sets the stage for extension of dysarthria management to listener-targeted remediation-advancing clinical practice and enhanced communication and quality of life outcomes for this population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 19, 2024
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
September 1, 2024
2.2 years
May 10, 2021
July 11, 2024
September 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pretest Transcription Accuracy
A percentage words correct (PWC) score is tabulated for each listener at pretest. A higher score reflects greater speaker intelligibility (i.e., understanding).
All outcomes were collected during a single data collection session, that lasted no more than 90 minutes. Pretest transcription accuracy is assessed at the pretest, immediately before a single session of perceptual training.
Posttest Transcription Accuracy
A percentage words correct (PWC) score is tabulated for each listener at posttest. Higher scores reflect greater speaker intelligibility (i.e., understanding).
All outcomes were collected during a single data collection session, lasting no longer than 90 minutes. Transcription accuracy at posttest was assessed at posttest, immediately after perceptual training.
Study Arms (5)
Perceptual training with a speaker with dysarthria - Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
EXPERIMENTALTo examine the effect of perceptual training with different speakers with dysarthria, we use a standard three-phase perceptual training protocol involving pretest, training, and posttest phases. Speech samples from a single speaker with dysarthria are utilized for all three phases. In this arm, listener participants were assigned to Speaker 1 (mixed flaccid-spastic dysarthria due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis)
Perceptual training with a speaker with dysarthria - Ataxic 1
EXPERIMENTALTo examine the effect of perceptual training with different speakers with dysarthria, we use a standard three-phase perceptual training protocol involving pretest, training, and posttest phases. Speech samples from a single speaker with dysarthria are utilized for all three phases. In this arm, listener participants were assigned to Speaker 2 (Ataxic dysarthria due to cerebellar degeneration)
Perceptual training with a speaker with dysarthria - Parkinson's disease (PD) 1
EXPERIMENTALTo examine the effect of perceptual training with different speakers with dysarthria, we use a standard three-phase perceptual training protocol involving pretest, training, and posttest phases. Speech samples from a single speaker with dysarthria are utilized for all three phases. In this arm, listener participants were assigned to Speaker 3 (hypokinetic dysarthria due to Parkinson's disease)
Perceptual training with a speaker with dysarthria - Ataxic 2
EXPERIMENTALTo examine the effect of perceptual training with different speakers with dysarthria, we use a standard three-phase perceptual training protocol involving pretest, training, and posttest phases. Speech samples from a single speaker with dysarthria are utilized for all three phases. In this arm, listener participants were assigned to Speaker 4 (Ataxic dysarthria due to cerebellar degeneration)
Perceptual training with a speaker with dysarthria - Parkinson's disease (PD) 2
EXPERIMENTALTo examine the effect of perceptual training with different speakers with dysarthria, we use a standard three-phase perceptual training protocol involving pretest, training, and posttest phases. Speech samples from a single speaker with dysarthria are utilized for all three phases. In this arm, listener participants were assigned to Speaker 5 (hypokinetic dysarthria due to Parkinson's disease)
Interventions
Each listener is familiarized/trained with a single speaker with dysarthria. Pretest/posttest transcription data will be used to build explanatory models of intelligibility improvement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \*Native speakers of American English
You may not qualify if:
- No self-reported history of speech impairment
- No self-reported history of language impairment
- No self-reported history of cognitive impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Florida State University
Tallahassee, Florida, 32301, United States
Utah State University
Logan, Utah, 84322, United States
Related Publications (11)
Borrie SA, Lansford KL, Barrett TS. Understanding dysrhythmic speech: When rhythm does not matter and learning does not happen. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 May;143(5):EL379. doi: 10.1121/1.5037620.
PMID: 29857710BACKGROUNDLansford KL, Borrie SA, Barrett TS. Regularity Matters: Unpredictable Speech Degradation Inhibits Adaptation to Dysarthric Speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Nov 20;62(12):4282-4290. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00055. Print 2019 Dec 18.
PMID: 31747531BACKGROUNDBorrie SA, Lansford KL, Barrett TS. Rhythm Perception and Its Role in Perception and Learning of Dysrhythmic Speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Mar 1;60(3):561-570. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0094.
PMID: 28241307BACKGROUNDLansford KL, Borrie SA, Bystricky L. Use of Crowdsourcing to Assess the Ecological Validity of Perceptual-Training Paradigms in Dysarthria. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 May 1;25(2):233-9. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-15-0059.
PMID: 27145295BACKGROUNDBorrie SA, McAuliffe MJ, Liss JM, Kirk C, O'Beirne GA, Anderson T. Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech. Lang Cogn Process. 2012 Sep 1;27(7-8):1039-1055. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.610596.
PMID: 24009401BACKGROUNDBorrie SA, Lansford KL, Barrett TS. Generalized Adaptation to Dysarthric Speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Nov 9;60(11):3110-3117. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0127.
PMID: 29075754BACKGROUNDLansford KL, Luhrsen S, Ingvalson EM, Borrie SA. Effects of Familiarization on Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Feb 6;27(1):91-98. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-17-0090.
PMID: 29305612BACKGROUNDHirsch ME, Lansford KL, Barrett TS, Borrie SA. Generalized Learning of Dysarthric Speech Between Male and Female Talkers. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Feb 17;64(2):444-451. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00313. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
PMID: 33508210BACKGROUNDLansford KL, Borrie SA, Barrett TS, Flechaus C. When Additional Training Isn't Enough: Further Evidence That Unpredictable Speech Inhibits Adaptation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jun 22;63(6):1700-1711. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00380. Epub 2020 May 20.
PMID: 32437259BACKGROUNDBorrie SA, Lansford KL, Barrett TS. A Clinical Advantage: Experience Informs Recognition and Adaptation to a Novel Talker With Dysarthria. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 May 11;64(5):1503-1514. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00663. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
PMID: 33831307BACKGROUNDBorrie SA, Barrett TS, Yoho SE. Autoscore: An open-source automated tool for scoring listener perception of speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Jan;145(1):392. doi: 10.1121/1.5087276.
PMID: 30710955BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
While classified as a clinical trial, the aims of this study were to build explanatory models of perceptual learning of dysarthric speech. All participants received perceptual training with one of 5 speakers with dysarthria. The focus of this work was not to establish the efficacy of perceptual training but rather to identify individual listener variables that support perceptual learning. As such, all models were built on individual participant data.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Stephanie Borrie
- Organization
- Utah State University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephanie A Borrie, PhD
Utah State University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kaitlin L Lansford, PhD
Florida State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2021
First Posted
May 21, 2021
Study Start
April 26, 2021
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
July 1, 2023
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Results First Posted
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Within one year of completion
- Access Criteria
- Information related to the protocol and statistical analysis plan will be shared in future publications. The analytic code will be shared via the Open Science website, with the link included in associated publications.
Results of the proposed research will be disseminated through conference presentations and manuscripts submitted to academic journals. In addition, the de-identified data will be available for public access via a data repository at the University of Michigan (ICPSR). The study will be registered in ClinicalTrials.gov within 21 days of enrollment of the first participant. Results will be submitted within 1 year of completion of the study. Informed consent documents will contain a statement concerning posting of information to ClinicalTrials.gov. Utah State University's Investigator Handbook (Chapter 9) outlines a policy for reporting all ClinicalTrials.gov information, specifically stating that it is the PI's responsibility to do so according to NIH policy.