NCT04858035

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to measure the effects of online perceptual training on perception and production in children with RSE who exhibit atypical perception relative to norms from our lab-based pilot data. In a multiple-baseline across-subjects design, 10 children with RSE will begin in a baseline phase probing perceptual acuity for /r/. Perceptual training with multiple types of stimuli will be initiated in a staggered fashion. Production probes elicited before and after treatment will assess the extent to which perception gains transfer to /r/ production.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 5, 2021

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 26, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 21, 2022

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 5, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

April 5, 2021

Results QC Date

May 2, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

speech sound disorderauditory perceptionarticulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Averaged Perception Percent Accuracy Score

    Averaged percent accuracy post-perception training.

    Participants' perception progress was tracked across all treatment phases. The averaged percent accuracy score reported here was collected during maintenance sessions (3 sessions across 1 week).

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Raw Change in Percent Accuracy Perception Task

    Participants' progress was tracked across pre-treatment phase (averaged baselines) compared to post treatment phase (averaged three maintenance sessions which occurred over 1 week), up to 8 weeks, including baselines, treatment, and maintenance sessions.

  • Perceptually Rated Accuracy of /r/ Word Production

    Participants' progress was tracked across pre-treatment phase (averaged baselines) compared to post treatment phase (averaged three maintenance sessions which occurred over 1 week), up to 8 weeks, including baselines, treatment, and maintenance sessions.

Study Arms (1)

Online Speech Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will be randomly assigned to transition from the baseline to the treatment condition at one of 7 possible points, ranging from 3 to 9 baseline sessions. All participants will receive 12 sessions of perceptual training over 4 weeks. Finally, participants will complete a 3-session maintenance phase in which perception and production are probed but not treated. Perception will be measured using the identification and category goodness judgment. Following completion of perception training all participants will complete two weeks of production training. The production training will consists of 4, 60-minute sessions. Each session will provide instruction and practice trials.

Behavioral: Perceptual trainingBehavioral: Production training

Interventions

Perceptual training involves self-paced presentation of auditory stimuli via a computerized software program. Stimuli are organized into three separate tasks: Tasks 1 and 3 will train category goodness judgment: Participants will hear 75 naturally produced speech tokens containing /r/ from various speakers, with a balance of correct and incorrect productions. They will classify each /r/ as correct or incorrect and receive feedback on the accuracy of their classification. Tasks 1 and 3 differ in that task 1 will feature a subset of items designed to provide focused practice on a specific context (e.g., initial /r/ as in red; /r/ as syllable nucleus as in sir), with increasing difficulty over time, whereas task 3 will feature randomly selected items representing all contexts and difficulty levels. Task 2: Participants will hear 75 items drawn from the synthetic rake-wake continuum used in the identification task administered at baseline.

Online Speech Training

Instruction: Discuss tongue shapes for /r/. Pre-practice: relatively unstructured, highly interactive elicitation; provide models and placement cue and KP on every trial. Structured syllable practice: Practice will occur in blocks of 10 consecutive trials on the same syllable (e.g., 10 /ra/), after which a new syllable will be addressed (e.g., 10 /re/--but note that in the fully blocked condition, the same syllable should occur in two consecutive blocks of 10).

Online Speech Training

Eligibility Criteria

Age9 Years - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Must be between 9;0 and 15;11 years of age at the time of enrollment.
  • Must speak English as the dominant language (i.e., must have begun learning English by age 2, per parent report).
  • Must speak a rhotic dialect of English.
  • Must pass a pure-tone hearing screening at 20dB HL
  • Must pass a brief examination of oral structure and function.
  • Must exhibit less than 30% accuracy, based on consensus across 2 trained listeners, on a probe list eliciting rhotics in various phonetic contexts at the word level.
  • Must exhibit no more than 3 sounds other than /r/ in error on the GFTA-3

You may not qualify if:

  • Must not receive a T score more than 1.3 SD below the mean on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-2 (WASI-2) Matrix Reasoning
  • Must not receive a scaled score of 7 or higher on the Recalling Sentences and Formulated Sentences subtests of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-5 (CELF-5).
  • Must not have an existing diagnosis of developmental disability or major neurobehavioral syndrome such as cerebral palsy, Down Syndrome, or Autism Spectrum Disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Montclair State University- Online Research Study

Upper Montclair, New Jersey, 07043, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Preston JL, Hitchcock ER, Leece MC. Auditory Perception and Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment Outcomes for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Distortions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Feb 26;63(2):444-455. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00060. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

    PMID: 32097058BACKGROUND
  • Byun TM, Hitchcock ER. Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Aug;21(3):207-21. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0083). Epub 2012 Mar 21.

    PMID: 22442281BACKGROUND
  • McAllister Byun T. Efficacy of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Rhotic Errors: A Single-Subject Randomization Study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 May 24;60(5):1175-1193. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0038.

    PMID: 28389677BACKGROUND
  • McAllister Byun T, Harel D, Halpin PF, Szeredi D. Deriving gradient measures of child speech from crowdsourced ratings. J Commun Disord. 2016 Nov-Dec;64:91-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 6.

    PMID: 27481555BACKGROUND
  • Harel D, Hitchcock ER, Szeredi D, Ortiz J, McAllister Byun T. Finding the experts in the crowd: Validity and reliability of crowdsourced measures of children's gradient speech contrasts. Clin Linguist Phon. 2017;31(1):104-117. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2016.1174306. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

    PMID: 27267258BACKGROUND
  • Preston JL, Benway NR, Leece MC, Hitchcock ER, McAllister T. Tutorial: Motor-Based Treatment Strategies for /r/ Distortions. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Oct 2;51(4):966-980. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00012. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

    PMID: 32783706BACKGROUND
  • Byun TM, Hitchcock ER, Swartz MT. Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2116-30. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0034.

    PMID: 25088034BACKGROUND
  • Dugan SH, Silbert N, McAllister T, Preston JL, Sotto C, Boyce SE. Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors. Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(4):295-315. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1477834. Epub 2018 May 24.

    PMID: 29792525BACKGROUND
  • McAllister Byun T, Tiede M. Perception-production relations in later development of American English rhotics. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0172022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172022. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28207800BACKGROUND
  • McAllister T, Preston JL, Hitchcock ER, Hill J. Protocol for Correcting Residual Errors with Spectral, ULtrasound, Traditional Speech therapy Randomized Controlled Trial (C-RESULTS RCT). BMC Pediatr. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1941-5.

    PMID: 32046671BACKGROUND
  • Hitchcock ER, Byun TM. Enhancing generalisation in biofeedback intervention using the challenge point framework: a case study. Clin Linguist Phon. 2015 Jan;29(1):59-75. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.956232. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

    PMID: 25216375BACKGROUND
  • McAllister Byun T, Swartz MT, Halpin PF, Szeredi D, Maas E. Direction of attentional focus in biofeedback treatment for /r/ misarticulation. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Jul;51(4):384-401. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12215. Epub 2016 Mar 6.

    PMID: 26947142BACKGROUND
  • Hitchcock, ER, Cabbage, KL, Swartz, M, Carrell, T. Measuring Speech Perception Using the Wide-Range Acoustic Accuracy Scale: Preliminary Findings. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(4):1098-1112, 2020.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hitchcock ER, Swartz MT, Lopez M. Speech Sound Disorder and Visual Biofeedback Intervention: A Preliminary Investigation of Treatment Intensity. Semin Speech Lang. 2019 Mar;40(2):124-137. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677763. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

    PMID: 30795023BACKGROUND
  • Byun TM, Hitchcock ER, Ferron J. Masked Visual Analysis: Minimizing Type I Error in Visually Guided Single-Case Design for Communication Disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 10;60(6):1455-1466. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0344.

    PMID: 28595354BACKGROUND
  • Hitchcock ER, Harel D, Byun TM. Social, Emotional, and Academic Impact of Residual Speech Errors in School-Aged Children: A Survey Study. Semin Speech Lang. 2015 Nov;36(4):283-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562911. Epub 2015 Oct 12.

    PMID: 26458203BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Speech Sound Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Communication DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Elaine R. Hitchcock
Organization
Montclair State University

Study Officials

  • Elaine R. Hitchcock, PhD

    Montclair State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This study follows a multiple-baseline across-subjects design with random assignment of participants to different baseline durations. Following the initial evaluation to determine eligibility, participants will be enrolled in a baseline phase in which perception and production abilities will be probed but not treated. Perception will be measured using the online identification and category goodness tasks and production will be measured from standard probes containing /r/ in various phonetic contexts. Participants will be randomly assigned to transition from the baseline to the treatment condition at one of 7 possible points, ranging from 3 to 9 baseline sessions. All participants will receive 12 sessions of perceptual training over 4 weeks followed by 4 sessions of production training over 2 weeks.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2021

First Posted

April 26, 2021

Study Start

January 21, 2022

Primary Completion

June 30, 2024

Study Completion

June 30, 2024

Last Updated

September 5, 2025

Results First Posted

September 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations