US PRECISION Implementation Study
Implementation of the US PRECISION AIRQ, Asthma Checklist, and Educational Resources (PRECISION Program) Into Clinical Practice Using Telehealth and In-Person Platforms
1 other identifier
interventional
857
1 country
13
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this community program intervention study is to assess the process and potential benefits of integrating the AIRQ®, Asthma Checklist, and educational resources (PRECISION program) into clinical practice using either in-person or telehealth visits. The secondary objectives are to assess asthma patients' clinic visit experiences when the AIRQ, the Asthma Checklist, and educational resources (PRECISION program) are utilized as part of a telehealth or in-person visit with their HCP, and to explore change in AIRQ scores from the initial visit to follow-up visit(s) (when available).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable asthma
Started Apr 2021
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 8, 2025
CompletedJuly 8, 2025
June 1, 2025
2 years
March 29, 2021
June 6, 2024
July 4, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (21)
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for Each Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Overall Ease of Implementing AIRQ Into Clinical Practice.
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program (e.g., how would you rate the overall ease of implementing the AIRQ into your clinical practice using the telehealth platform?)
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for the Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to How Much the AIRQ Helped Manage Patients
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., Did AIRQ help you manage your patients?)
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for the Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Whether the AIRQ Helped Identify Patients at Risk for Adverse Asthma Health Outcomes
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., Did AIRQ help you identify patients who were at risk for adverse health outcomes from their asthma that you would have otherwise missed?)
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for Each Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Most and Least Helpful Parts of AIRQ
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., What did you find most useful about AIRQ?)
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for the Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Frequency of Referring to a Specialist or Practice Type Different Than Their Own While Using the AIRQ
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., While using AIRQ how often did you refer to a specialist or practice type different than your own?)
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for the Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Components of Care Improved by AIRQ
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., Did AIRQ improve any of the following?)
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for Each Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Importance of Using Different Components of the PRECISION Program
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., How important was it for you to use the Assess component of the Asthma Checklist (page 1) with the AIRQ?).
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
Average Number of Patients Treated Using the PRECISION Program at Each Site as Reported by Site HCPs by Site Type
The post-study HCP survey asks sites to report the number of patients treated using the PRECISION program at their site. One HCP per site reported on the number of patients treated using the PRECISION program at their site. The mean presented is the number of patients at each site as reported by site HCPs divided by the number of sites.
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
Descriptive Free-text Site HCP Responses to Open-ended Question on Post-study Survey on Features of PRECISION Program: Primary Care Sites
On the post-study survey, one HCP per site (site PI) was asked to describe the features of the PRECISION program they thought were the most useful and could be improved when implemented at their site
Post-study survey was completed between 32.9 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
Descriptive Free-text Site HCP Responses to Open-ended Question on Post-study Survey on Features of PRECISION Program: Specialty Care Sites
On the post-study survey, one HCP per site (site PI) was asked to describe the features of the PRECISION program they thought were most useful and could be improved when implemented at their site
Post-study survey was completed between 22.1 weeks and 50.4 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
Descriptive Free-text Site HCP Responses to Open-ended Question on Post-study Survey on Features of PRECISION Program: Novel Care Site
On the post-study survey, one HCP per site (site PI) was asked to describe the features of the PRECISION program they thought were most useful and could be improved when implemented at their site
Post-study survey was completed 5 weeks after last patient end of follow-up; end of follow up was 6 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
Descriptive Free-text Clinician Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Primary Care Sites
Site clinicians were asked to respond to several open-ended questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
Post-study clinician interviews were completed between -2 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 52.4 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
Descriptive Free-text Key Site Staff Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Primary Care Sites
Key site staff were asked to respond to several open-ended questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
Post-study key site staff interviews were completed between -2 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 43 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
Descriptive Free-text Clinician Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Specialty Care Sites
Site clinicians were asked to respond to several open-ended interview questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
Post-study clinician interviews were completed between -6.3 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 23 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
Descriptive Free-text Key Site Staff Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Specialty Care Sites
Key site staff were asked to respond to several open-ended questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
Post-study site staff interviews were completed between -6.3 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 4.7 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
Descriptive Free-text HCP Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Novel Site
Site HCPs were asked to respond to several open-ended interview questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
Post-study HCP interviews were completed 5 weeks after last patient end of follow-up; end of follow up was 6 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
Descriptive Free-text Key Site Staff Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Novel Site
Key site staff were asked to respond to several open-ended questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
Post-study key site staff interviews were completed 5 weeks after last patient end of follow-up; end of follow up was 6 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
Descriptive Free-text Site Staff Responses to the Implementation Touchpoint Questions: Primary Care Sites (Month 1)
At each touchpoint, site staff were asked to respond to questions about the implementation of the PRECISION program (e.g., what aspects of the study implementation are going well for your site?)
Month 1 after start of implementation
Descriptive Free-text Site Staff Responses to the Implementation Touchpoint Questions: Primary Care Sites (Month 2)
At each touchpoint, site staff were asked to respond to questions about the implementation of the PRECISION program (e.g., what aspects of the study implementation are going well for your site?)
Month 2 after start of implementation
Descriptive Free-text Site Staff Responses to the Implementation Touchpoint Questions: Specialty Care Sites (Month 1)
At each touchpoint, site staff were asked to respond to questions about the implementation of the PRECISION program (e.g., what aspects of the study implementation are going well for your site?)
Month 1 after start of implementation
Descriptive Free-text Site Staff Responses to the Implementation Touchpoint Questions: Novel Care Site (Month 2)
At each touchpoint, site staff were asked to respond to questions about the implementation of the PRECISION program (e.g., what aspects of the study implementation are going well for your site?)
Month 2 after start of implementation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Patient AIRQ Score From Baseline to Follow-up Visits: Mean and Standard Deviation at Each Visit
Mean (SD) time to follow-up was 3.3 (SD = 1.4) months
Change in Patient AIRQ Score From Baseline to Follow-up Visits: Mean Difference and Confidence Interval
Mean (SD) time to follow-up was 3.3 (SD = 1.4) months
Change in Patient AIRQ Control Level From Baseline to Follow-up Visit
Mean (SD) time to follow-up was 3.3 (SD = 1.4) months
Percentage of Endorsement of Responses for Each of the 8 Categorical Items on the ACE Questionnaire
Baseline
Study Arms (1)
AIRQ, Asthma Checklist, and PRECISION Program
EXPERIMENTALAll participants in the trial will be given the behavioral interventions which include the AIRQ tool, the Asthma Checklist tool, and the PRECISION program educational resources.
Interventions
A validated tool designed to identify patients who may be at risk for adverse outcomes from uncontrolled asthma.
A validated, 3-page tool, based on GINA and NAEPP guidelines to assist providers with recognition, evaluation, and optimization of all patients with asthma. In this study, healthcare providers will be required to complete the assess component (page 1) of the Asthma Checklist .
Educational resources accessible to all providers in the study. There are provider-facing and patient-facing educational materials that can be accessed during the patient visit or as resources for before/after visits. Resources can be downloaded and sent to patients per the discretion of providers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \>= 13 years of age at the time of enrollment
- Diagnosis of HCP-confirmed asthma
- Able to read, understand and speak English or Spanish sufficiently self-complete or be administered the AIRQ via telephone, desktop, or mobile device (e.g., smartphone, iPad)
- Provide consent (adults/parents/guardians) and assent (age 13-17 years) to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Current diagnosis of active COPD or any lower respiratory diagnosis other than asthma
- Has a cognitive impairment, hearing difficulty, acute psychopathology, medical condition, or insufficient knowledge of the English or Spanish language that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with his or her ability to agree to participate and/or complete the AIRQ or other study questionnaires
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (13)
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209, United States
Research Site
Leesburg, Florida, 34748, United States
Research Site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819, United States
Research Site
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46802, United States
Research Site
Tewksbury, Massachusetts, 01876, United States
Research Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Research Site
Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, 12518, United States
Research Site
Rochester, New York, 14607, United States
Research Site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801, United States
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19148, United States
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78249, United States
Research Site
Vienna, Virginia, 22182, United States
Research Site
Charleston, West Virginia, 25304, United States
Related Publications (1)
Murphy KR, Chipps B, Beuther DA, Wise RA, McCann W, Gilbert I, Eudicone JM, Gandhi HN, Harding G, Coyne KS, Zeiger RS; US PRECISION Advisory Board. Development of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ): A Composite Control Measure. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jul-Aug;8(7):2263-2274.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.02.042. Epub 2020 May 6.
PMID: 32387166BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Due to low participation on the optional patient web-survey, limited data were available for the ACE, thus limiting full analyses of the secondary objective relating to patient satisfaction with visit when AIRQ implemented based on responses to ACE.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center
- Organization
- AstraZeneca
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2021
First Posted
May 19, 2021
Study Start
April 20, 2021
Primary Completion
April 30, 2023
Study Completion
April 30, 2023
Last Updated
July 8, 2025
Results First Posted
July 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
- Access Criteria
- When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.