NCT04023422

Brief Summary

Asthma-related deaths are more numerous among low-income minority patients and older adults with chronic diseases. Guidelines for asthma management have not addressed the needs of these groups. The investigators recently demonstrated the feasibility, acceptability, and evidence of effectiveness of two interventions to improve access to care, patient-provider communication, and asthma outcomes: 1) CI: clinic intervention using a patient advocate to prepare for, attend, and confirm understanding of an office visit, and 2) HV: home visits for care coordination and informing clinicians of home barriers to managing asthma is associated with subsequent improvement in asthma outcomes. This project explores whether these interventions can be combined for greater effectiveness, delivery of guideline-based asthma care, and outcomes in low-income minority patients. In a randomized controlled factorial trial, 400 adults with uncontrolled asthma living in low-income urban neighborhoods are offered 18-months' participation: 12 months of clinical intervention and 6 months of evaluation to monitor sustainability of interventions and outcomes. Patients will be randomized to 1) a patient advocate and (2) an advocate and home visits, (3) an advocate and real-time feedback to the asthma provider (clinician) at each clinic visit of guidelines-relevant relevant information, and 4) (2), and (3). Interventions will be delivered by a community health worker. The study estimates Specific Aim 1: improvement over time of within-group (before-after in four groups) asthma outcomes (asthma control, quality of life, ED visits, hospitalizations, prednisone bursts) Specific Aim 2: across group differences in improvement over time in asthma outcomes; Specific Aim 3: the costs associated with each of the interventions. A cost-offset analysis will determine which intervention costs are offset by savings attributable to reductions in ED, hospitalization or other visits for asthma control and other outcomes. Exploratory Aim: changes in behavior from the interventions using interviews of clinicians and patients. Investigators hypothesize that improved outcomes in asthma patients will result from enhanced patient-clinician communication, clinician attention to home environmental exposures, and clinician consideration of the guidelines, at a program cost offset by lower patient health care utilization.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
367

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable asthma

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable asthma

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 12, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 17, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 21, 2019

Completed
5.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 20, 2025

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.4 years

First QC Date

July 12, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Asthma Control at baseline

    Asthma Control Questionnaire. The questionnaire has a numerical result 0 - 6 based on response to questionnaire, with lower number indicating better control

    At randomization

  • Asthma Control at 3 months

    Asthma Control Questionnaire. The questionnaire has a numerical result 0 - 6 based on response to questionnaire, with lower number indicating better control

    3 months

  • Asthma Control at 6 months

    Asthma Control Questionnaire. The questionnaire has a numerical result 0 - 6 based on response to questionnaire, with lower number indicating better control

    6 months

  • Asthma Control at 9 months

    Asthma Control Questionnaire. The questionnaire has a numerical result 0 - 6 based on response to questionnaire, with lower number indicating better control

    9 months

  • Asthma Control at 12 months

    Asthma Control Questionnaire. The questionnaire has a numerical result 0 - 6 based on response to questionnaire, with lower number indicating better control

    12 months

  • Asthma Control at 15 months

    Asthma Control Questionnaire. The questionnaire has a numerical result 0 - 6 based on response to questionnaire, with lower number indicating better control

    15 months

  • Asthma Control at 18 months

    Asthma Control Questionnaire. The questionnaire has a numerical result 0 - 6 based on response to questionnaire, with lower number indicating better control

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • hospitalizations for asthma

    hospitalizations at 3 months

  • hospitalizations for asthma

    hospitalizations at 6 months

  • hospitalizations for asthma

    hospitalizations at 9 months

  • hospitalizations for asthma

    hospitalizations at 12 months

  • hospitalizations for asthma

    hospitalizations at 15 months

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Clinical intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Clinical health navigator, a community health worker, facilitates preparation for, attends, and confirms patients's understanding of an office visit.

Behavioral: Clinical interventionBehavioral: Feedback

Clinical intervention AND Home Visit

EXPERIMENTAL

Patient receives Clinical intervention and Home visits. Care coordination activities occur taking into account the home environment, its social and physical characteristics.

Behavioral: Clinical interventionBehavioral: Feedback

Clinical intervention AND Feedback

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Clinical interventionBehavioral: Feedback

Clinical intervention AND Home Visit AND Feedback

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Clinical interventionBehavioral: Feedback

Interventions

The community health navigator will ask patient to produce medications, to indicate if there are current smokers in the home, to look for structural problems within the home, presence of pests, allergens, pollutants. Pt will be asked to produce their current medications. At the end a report will be written for the clinician.

Also known as: Home Visit
Clinical interventionClinical intervention AND FeedbackClinical intervention AND Home VisitClinical intervention AND Home Visit AND Feedback
FeedbackBEHAVIORAL

The community health navigator will give the clinician real-time feedback on guideline-related health.

Clinical interventionClinical intervention AND FeedbackClinical intervention AND Home VisitClinical intervention AND Home Visit AND Feedback

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female or male \> 18 years and living in a Philadelphia neighborhood in which at least 20% of households have incomes below the federal poverty level (19104, 19120, 19121, 19122, 19124, 19125, 19131, 19132, 19133, 19134, 19139, 19140, 19141, 19142, 19143, 19144, 19145, 19146, 19153, 19151)
  • A patient in a participating clinic
  • Doctor's diagnosis of asthma
  • Prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid for asthma
  • Required prednisone or an Emergency Department (ED) visit or hospitalization for asthma within 12 months before enrollment.
  • Some patients with a diagnosis of asthma and prescribed inhaled corticosteroid may also have mention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in their record, particularly if they smoke. Asthma and COPD are both heterogeneous diseases, and may be impossible to distinguish by clinical characteristics.Both COPD and asthma can have evidence of reversible obstruction and also of irreversible obstruction. It is important not to exclude these patients, sometimes called overlap patients as they may benefit from these interventions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe psychiatric or cognitive problems making it impossible to understand or carry out the protocol;
  • Excluded are those with other chronic lung diseases: lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, heart failure, chronic bronchitis, pulmonary hypertension, a candidate or recipient for lung transplant, a history of bronchial thermoplasty.
  • Excluded are those with more than 20 pack year tobacco use.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University of Pennsylvania Health Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

University of Pennsylvania Health System

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Interventions

House Calls

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Professional PracticeOrganization and AdministrationHealth Services Administration

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: All patients will receive the clinical intervention (CI). In a 2-factor, 2-level factorial design, patients will be randomized to one of four groups by home visitor (HV) and/or physician feedback(CF) intervention: CI + HV, CI + CF, CI + HV + CF, CI. Well-suited for the investigation of the separate components of an intervention, a factorial design permits simple and powerful comparisons between the two factors (home visitor (HV) and clinician feedback CF), cell specific contrasts (the addition of home visitors among patients who have no physician feedback), and the interaction of both interventions. Each patient will be followed over time, so that the additional power of the factorial design will complement the confounder control inherent in randomization plus longitudinal analysis.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prinicipal Investigator, Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2019

First Posted

July 17, 2019

Study Start

August 21, 2019

Primary Completion

January 20, 2025

Study Completion

April 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Locations