Virtual Reality as a Substitute for Procedural Sedation During Epidural Steroid Injections
Can Distraction Substitute for Procedural Sedation and Improve Tolerance in Patients Receiving Epidural Steroid Injection for Pain? A Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
146
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examines the impact of virtual reality compared to sedation (midazolam and/or fentanyl) and no intervention on pain experienced from an epidural steroid injection (ESI). The intervention group (who receive virtual reality as a distraction modality) is compared to a sedation group and a control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 28, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 26, 2024
CompletedDecember 2, 2024
November 1, 2024
1.4 years
May 7, 2021
July 1, 2024
November 25, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Score During Procedure
0-10 verbal rating scale (higher scores indicate greater pain)
Immediately after procedure
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Amount of Local Anesthetic Required
At the start of the procedure
Subcutaneous Skin Wheal Pain Score
Immediately after skin wheal
Procedure Satisfaction
In postanesthetic care unit (within 1 hour)
Ability to Communicate
In postanesthetic care unit (within 1 hour)
Procedure-related Anxiety
In postanesthetic care unit (within 1 hour)
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Virtual reality (VR)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in the VR group will be fitted with an HTC headset and headphones with disposable ear covers. They will choose from a menu of 6 different programs. They will also receive 1% superficial anesthesia.
Sedation
ACTIVE COMPARATORConscious sedation will be accomplished by the use of midazolam and/ or fentanyl. We will use a wide range of dosing (1-5 mg for midazolam, up to 150 mcg for fentanyl) to maximize generalizability and account for widespread variability in clinical circumstances, medical practice and patient response (personalized medicine). All medications will be titrated to conscious sedation by a board-certified anesthesiologist. Subjects will also receive 1% superficial anesthesia.
Standard care
OTHERPatients in this arm will be administered only 1% lidocaine as superficial anesthesia, similar to the other 2 arms.
Interventions
Subjects in the virtual reality group will be offered a variety of immersive environments to choose from (mountains, beach, rainforest and temperate forest) in addition to local anesthetic.
Sedation will be administered using low-dose midazolam and/ or fentanyl. We will use a wide range of dosing (1-5 mg for midazolam, up to 150 mcg for fentanyl) to maximize generalizability and account for widespread variability in clinical circumstances, medical practice and patient response (personalized medicine). Sedation will be titrated to effect by a board-certified or eligible anesthesiologist so that patients remain responsive to verbal stimuli.
Patients will receive superficial local anesthetic with 1% lidocaine. Local anesthetic will be administered by the physician performing the procedure titrated to patient comfort.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females; ages 18-90 years
- Lumbosacral radicular pain with a baseline average of leg pain score of \> 4/10, MRI findings (if available) consistent with symptoms, duration of pain \> 6 weeks, and no previous lumbar spine surgery.
- Documented diagnosis of radicular pain caused by herniated disc, central stenosis, foraminal stenosis, degenerative disk disease
- Willingness to adhere to undergo ESI with either sedation (midazolam and or fentanyl) or with virtual reality
- Able to appear for a follow up visit between 24-40 days following the intervention
You may not qualify if:
- MRI findings discordant with symptoms (absence of herniated disc, spinal stenosis or severe disc degeneration without nerve root impingement (e.g. annular tears) that could explain symptoms)
- Previous lumbosacral spine surgery at the area affected
- Prior ESI within the past 6 months
- Allergy to contrast dye
- Poorly controlled psychiatric conditions that could affect outcomes (e.g. active substance abuse) or impose a barrier to participation (e.g. anxiety disorder requiring procedural sedation)
- Morbid obesity (BMI \>40)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
- The Geneva Foundationcollaborator
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Centercollaborator
- United States Naval Medical Center, San Diegocollaborator
- Brigham and Women's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Related Publications (2)
Indovina P, Barone D, Gallo L, Chirico A, De Pietro G, Giordano A. Virtual Reality as a Distraction Intervention to Relieve Pain and Distress During Medical Procedures: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Clin J Pain. 2018 Sep;34(9):858-877. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000599.
PMID: 29485536RESULTMallari B, Spaeth EK, Goh H, Boyd BS. Virtual reality as an analgesic for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 3;12:2053-2085. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S200498. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31308733RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Steven P. Cohen
- Organization
- Northwestern University
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Whitley Lucio
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven P Cohen, MD
Johns Hopkins Uinversity - SOM Ane Pain
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nuj Tontisirin, MD
Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pornpan Chalermkitpanit, MD
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pramote Euasobhon, MD
Siriraj Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sithapan Munjupong, MD
Phramongkutklao College of Medicine
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Qian Chen, MD
NYU Langone Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessor will be unaware of treatment allocation but the patient and provider cannot be.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2021
First Posted
May 14, 2021
Study Start
March 28, 2022
Primary Completion
August 15, 2023
Study Completion
August 15, 2023
Last Updated
December 2, 2024
Results First Posted
August 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 6 months after publication until 3 years
- Access Criteria
- By e-mail request, upon approval by Dept. of Defense
Protocol, Informed Consent Form, deidentified data and statistical code.