Study Stopped
Coronavirus (COVID-19)-related pause on all clinical research studies.
Virtual Reality During Procedures in Pediatric Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This stratified, randomized, controlled trial compared coping and distress between child life supported virtual reality engagement and child life support during painful procedures in the pediatric emergency department.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 5, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 28, 2020
CompletedAugust 6, 2020
July 1, 2020
9 months
September 25, 2018
June 9, 2020
July 28, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in Patient-Reported Pain During the Procedure
Pain described on visual analog scale (0-10), or Wong-Faces Scale (0-10) with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain. Change in pain scores (calculated during procedure - pre-procedure) ranges from -10 to 10. A negative number signifies reduced pain during the procedure.
Baseline and Immediately post-procedure, up to 15 minutes
Change in Patient-Reported Anxiety During Procedure
Patient anxiety after procedures was described on a visual analog scale (0-10). This is a scale of range 0-10 with 0 being no anxiety and 10 being maximum anxiety. Change in anxiety scores (calculated during procedure - pre-procedure) ranges from -10 to 10. A negative number signifies reduced anxiety during the procedure.
Baseline and Immediately post-procedure, up to 15 minutes
Change in Adult Perceived Pain During the Procedure
Perceived pain ratings were obtained for caregivers after the procedure based on a 0-10 Likert rating scale with 0 representing the least pain and 10 representing the most. Change in pain scores (calculated during procedure - pre-procedure) ranges from -10 to 10. A negative number signifies reduced pain during the procedure. This measure was assessed in caregivers.
Baseline and Immediately post-procedure, up to 15 minutes
Change in Adult Perceived Anxiety During the Procedure
The Subjective Units of Distress scale will be used to measure anxiety of subjects after procedures. This is a scale of 0-10 with 0 being no anxiety and 10 being maximum anxiety. Change in anxiety scores (calculated during procedure - pre-procedure) ranges from -10 to 10. A negative number signifies reduced anxiety during the procedure. This measure was assessed in caregivers.
Baseline and Immediately post-procedure, up to 15 minutes
Change in Adult's Own Anxiety During the Procedure
Anxiety ratings were obtained for caregivers after the procedure based on a 0-10 Likert rating scale with 0 representing the least anxiety and 10 representing the most. Change in anxiety scores (calculated during procedure - pre-procedure) ranges from -10 to 10. A negative number signifies reduced anxiety during the procedure. This measure was assessed in caregivers.
Baseline and Immediately post-procedure, up to 15 minutes
Child and Adult Medical Procedure Interaction Scale (CAMPIS) Score
Coping was measured using a modified CAMPIS-SF in both patients and caregivers. CAMPIS-SF (Child-Adult Medical Procedure Interaction Scale-Short Form) is a behavior rating scale that documents distressing or coping behaviors exhibited in both children and the accompanying adult (parent/guardian). It has been validated to measure coping in children and adults during medical procedures. The CAMPIS-SF study used a 5-point Likert scale to document frequency of each code In order to account for frequency variance due to differences in procedure duration, we used a proportion-based metric validated for CAMPIS-R, and applied this to CAMPIS-SF codes. Proportions were calculated by summing the total number of an event type (e.g. child distress) and dividing by the total number of coded events (child distress plus child coping). This provided a proportion for each event type so that the proportion of child distress plus child coping events add up to 1.0 (range 0-1.0).
Immediately post-procedure, up to 15minutes
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Duration of Procedure
Immediately post-procedure, up to 20 minutes
Ease of Procedure as Assessed by a Likert Scale
Immediately post-procedure, up to 15 minutes
Personnel Use for Immobilization
Immediately post-procedure, up to 15 minutes
Number of IV or Phlebotomy Attempts
Immediately post-procedure, up to 15 minutes
Pre-Procedure Nausea Symptoms
Immediately pre-procedure (15minutes)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Virtual Reality Group (Study Group)
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, patients will receive support from child life specialists plus may use virtual reality simulation goggles during a qualifying medical procedure.
Active Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONIn this arm, patients will receive standard of care with child life specialists plus distraction of the child's choosing, during a qualifying medical procedure.
External Control (Reference Group)
NO INTERVENTIONNo virtual reality and no child life specialists; no standardized or formal form of support.
Interventions
A child life specialist will fit the patient with the goggles, select a game, and initiate play once the medical procedure begins.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pediatric patients requiring painful or anxiety inducing procedures:
- Burn debridement
- Burn dressing change
- Lactation repair
- Intravenous (IV) line placement or phlebotomy (blood draw)
- Abscess incision and drainage
- Fracture reduction and/or cast placement
- Implanted central venous port placement accessing
- Skin biopsies
- Subjects ages 7 to 26 years of age (age 26 is the upper limit treated at JHCC) Ages were chosen based on that previously published in the literature on pediatric patients with VR.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a known history of a seizure disorder.
- Patients with an active infection, burn, or trauma that interferes with the mask placement, and may include involvement of the periorbital skin, eyes, nasal bridge, external ear, and/or scalp or hair.
- Patients with Blindness.
- Developmental delay significant enough to interfere with the subject's ability to participate in the session, including autism spectrum disorders.
- Patients with active psychosis or exhibit signs of active intoxication.
- Known history of severe motion sickness
- Medical urgency (at the medical providers' discretion)
- Non-verbal children
- Children or parents/legal guardians who are non-English speakers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins Children's Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21212, United States
Related Publications (2)
Canares T, Parrish C, Santos C, Badawi A, Stewart A, Kleinman K, Psoter K, McGuire J. Pediatric Coping During Venipuncture With Virtual Reality: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021 Jul 28;4(3):e26040. doi: 10.2196/26040.
PMID: 34319249DERIVEDCanares TL, Parrish C, Santos C, Badawi A, Stewart A, Kleinman K, Psoter KJ, McGuire JF. Resource Use During Pediatric Venipuncture With Virtual Reality: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Hosp Pediatr. 2021 Jul;11(7):775-778. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-003822. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
PMID: 34127486DERIVED
Limitations and Caveats
Early termination due to the COVID-19 pandemic, small sample size.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therese Canares
- Organization
- Johns Hopkins University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Therese Canares, MD
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2018
First Posted
September 26, 2018
Study Start
July 5, 2019
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Study Completion
March 30, 2020
Last Updated
August 6, 2020
Results First Posted
July 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share