EFFECT - EFFectiveness of ESPB (Erector Spinae Plane Block) in Laparoscopic Cοlectomies Trial
EFFECT
Effectiveness of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Laparoscopic Colectomies -A Randomized, Controlled, Double Blind, Prospective Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the trial is to study the efficacy of continuous bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in managing perioperative pain in patients who undergo elective laparoscopic colectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2022
CompletedMay 10, 2021
May 1, 2021
1.4 years
May 1, 2021
May 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Total Perioperative Tramadol Consumption
Total Perioperative Tramadol Consumption
96 hours after surgery
Quality of Recovery
Quality of Recovery-15 \[(QoR) -15\] Questionnaire. A questionnaire which consists of 15 questions in two Parts, rated from 0 to 10 ("0" is the worst and "10" is the best answer). The worst overall score is 0 and the best overall score is 150.
72 hours Post - Operatively
Mobilization Time
Time of Mobilization of the gastrointestinal tract and of the patient
In a time frame of up to 72 hours Post - Operatively
Start of Oral Fluids and Nutrition
Time of start of oral fluids and enteral nutrition
In a time frame up to 72 hours Post - Operatively
Satisfaction from Perioperative Analgesia
Satisfaction Score of the patient regarding perioperative analgesia, using a numerical rating scale from 1 to 6, where "1" means not satisfied at all and "6" means completely satisfied.
96 hours post - operatively
Hospitalization Days
Duration of hospital stay after surgery in days
In a time frame up to 2 Weeks Post - Operatively
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Pain Score, Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting Score at discharge from Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Immediately Post - Operatively
Pain Score, Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting Score 12 hours post-operatively
12 hours post - operatively
Pain Score, Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting Score 24 hours post-operatively
24 hours post - operatively
Pain Score, Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting Score 36 hours post-operatively
36 hours post - operatively
Pain Score, Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting Score 48 hours post-operatively
48 hours post - operatively
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ropivacaine Group
EXPERIMENTALESPB performed with infusion of Ropivacaine 0,375% (20 ml at ech side)
Control Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORESPB performed with infusion of N/S 0,9% (20 ml at each side)
Interventions
Effect of continuous ESPB performed with Ropivacaine 0,375% infusion, in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I, II, III Laparoscopic colectomy Elective surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal Known allergies to local anesthetics Other contraindications to regional anesthesia Infection or anatomic anomalies on injection site Uncontrolled hypertension Severe liver or kidney disease Pregnancy Known depression or psychiatric disorders, dementia Drug or alcohol abuse Inadequate command of Greek language
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Georgios Papanikolaou, General Hospital of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 57010, Greece
Related Publications (7)
Kwon HM, Kim DH, Jeong SM, Choi KT, Park S, Kwon HJ, Lee JH. Does Erector Spinae Plane Block Have a Visceral Analgesic Effect?: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sci Rep. 2020 May 21;10(1):8389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65172-0.
PMID: 32439926BACKGROUNDTulgar S, Selvi O, Senturk O, Serifsoy TE, Thomas DT. Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block: Indications, Complications, and Effects on Acute and Chronic Pain Based on a Single-center Experience. Cureus. 2019 Jan 2;11(1):e3815. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3815.
PMID: 30868029BACKGROUNDBeck DE, Margolin DA, Babin SF, Russo CT. Benefits of a Multimodal Regimen for Postsurgical Pain Management in Colorectal Surgery. Ochsner J. 2015 Winter;15(4):408-12.
PMID: 26730224BACKGROUNDGustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, Macfie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care; European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN); International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN). Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):259-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 23052794BACKGROUNDBenyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, Glaser SE, Vallejo R. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S105-20.
PMID: 18443635BACKGROUNDForero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016BACKGROUNDDe Cassai A, Cin SD, Zarantonello F, Ban I. Erector spinae plane block as a rescue therapy for uncontrolled pain after laparotomic surgery: A report of two cases. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):66-68. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_449_18.
PMID: 30692892BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., Msc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2021
First Posted
May 10, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
May 31, 2022
Study Completion
May 31, 2022
Last Updated
May 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share