Does ESPB Improve Postoperative Quality of Recovery After VATS
Does Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Improve Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive surgery. Despite reduced surgical trauma compared to the traditional thoracotomy approach, pain control after VATS remains challenging. Regional analgesia may be a crucial component of multimodal postoperative pain management. The use of nerve blocks, such as the recently described erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been shown in case reports to reduce pain and thus has the potential to improve patient recovery. This study aims to test the hypothesis that ultrasound-guided SPB would improve the quality of recovery after VATS by reducing acute postsurgical pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Dec 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 14, 2019
CompletedJanuary 28, 2020
January 1, 2020
11 months
November 13, 2018
January 26, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the 40-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) score
QoR-40 incorporates 40 questions assessing 5 dimensions of recovery, including emotional status, physical comfort, psychological support, physical independence, and pain. The global QoR-40 score ranges from 40 (extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 (excellent quality of recovery).
The QoR-40 questionnaire was completed by patients at 24 hours after surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
postoperative pain: numeric rating scale
Acute postoperative pain was assessed using an numeric rating scale (NRS) at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours following video-assisted thoracic surgery.
cumulative opioid consumption
Up to 48 hours after surgery.
PACU discharge time
Up to 2 hours
Incidence of nausea and vomiting
Up to 48 hours
Incidence of dizziness
Up to 48 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ESPB group
EXPERIMENTALPatient will receive a single shot of Ropivacaine injection 0.5% 25 mL injected at the erector spinae plane.
Control Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatient will receive a single shot of normal saline 25 mL injected at the erector spinae plane.
Interventions
Ropivacaine will be injected in the erector spinae plane
Normal saline will be injected in the erector spinae plane.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status class of I or II
- scheduled for elective VATS
You may not qualify if:
- a history of allergy to local anesthetics
- known coagulation disorders
- infection near the puncture site
- chronic opioid use
- inability to communicate,
- other reasons that not appropriate for this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Yusheng Yao
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Xiaochun Zheng, MD
Fujian Provincial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The randomization sequence will be computer generated. Allocation concealment will be carried out via concealed assignments in opaque, sealed, and consecutively numbered envelopes.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2018
First Posted
November 28, 2018
Study Start
December 28, 2018
Primary Completion
November 12, 2019
Study Completion
November 14, 2019
Last Updated
January 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years following article publication.
- Access Criteria
- All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and clinical study report can be accessed with approval from the corresponding author.
It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available.