Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Techniques in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Techniques in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adhesive capsulitis is a condition that causes limitation of function and movement in the shoulder joint and affects many activities of daily life. The clinical indicators of adhesive capsulitis; shoulder pain and progressive global stiffness of the glenohumeral joint, night pains and accompanying sleep disturbances, joint capsule contracture, decrease in synovial fluid, abnormal changes in scapular position, functional limitation and consequently decreased quality of life. When we look at the literature, it is seen that traditional rehabilitation practices aim to improve range of motion and reduce pain caused by capsular contracture. In this context, classical therapeutic exercises consisting of stretching and strengthening, joint mobilization methods, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation methods are applied. However, there are limited number of studies investigating the effects of PNF techniques on pain, function and activity limitation. Therefore, within the scope of the research, it is planned to apply a traditional rehabilitation program prepared in accordance with the guidelines for one group, and PNF approaches for the upper extremity and scapula in the other group. Thus, it is aimed to examine the effects of the use of upper extremity and scapula PNF techniques on pain, function, range of motion, proprioception, quality of life, sleep and patient satisfaction compared to traditional exercises in adhesive capsulitis rehabilitation. Exercises will be applied 3 days a week for 4 weeks. Each training session will last 45 minutes. Pain, function, range of motion, proprioception, quality of life and sleep quality evaluations will be performed at the beginning of the study and at the end of 4 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 10, 2021
CompletedMay 10, 2021
May 1, 2021
6 months
May 5, 2021
May 6, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire was developed to measure physical disability and symptoms of the upper extremities in people with upper extremity disorders (hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder). It is a 30-item scale that addresses difficulty in performing various physical activities that require upper extremity function (physical function, 21 items); symptoms of pain, activity-related pain, tingling, weakness, and stiffness (pain symptoms, 5 items); or impact of disability and symptoms on social activities, work, sleep, and psychological well-being (emotional and social function, 4 items). The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 = no disability and 100 = most severe disability. In this study, the change that occurred during the 4-week period from the beginning will be examined.
Baseline and end of weeks 4.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Evaluation of Shoulder Proprioception with Cybex Humac Norm II Isokinetic Dynamometer
Baseline and end of weeks 4.
Visual Analog Scale
Baseline and end of weeks 4.
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index
Baseline and end of weeks 4.
Shoulder Disability Scale
Baseline and end of weeks 4.
Range of Motion Assesment
Baseline and end of weeks 4.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation group will be given a treatment protocol consisting of rhythmic initiation, repeated stretch and hold-relax PNF techniques for upper extremity "flexion-abduction-external rotation" pattern and the scapular patterns of anterior elevation, posterior depression, anterior depression, posterior elevation for a total of 4 weeks, 3 days a week for 45 minutes. Assessments will be applied in the baseline and at the end of 4 weeks.
Conventional Rehabilitation Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the conventional rehabilitation group will be given a treatment protocol consisting of stretching, strengthening exercises and joint mobilization techniques for a total of 4 weeks, 3 days a week for 45 minutes. Assessments will be applied in the baseline and at the end of 4 weeks.
Interventions
Within the scope of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation exercises, rhythmic initiation, repeated stretch and hold-relax techniques in the upper extremity flexion-abduction-external rotation pattern and scapular patterns of anterior elevation, posterior depression, anterior depression and posterior elevation will be applied to the participants. In addition to these exercises, functional activities in the flexion-abduction-external rotation pattern such as hair combing, turning over from side lying, wearing a jacket, reaching on the shelf will be performed.
Active assisted / active range of motion exercises and Wand exercises will be applied to the participants in the conventional rehabilitation group for flexion, abduction and external rotation movements. Exercises will be applied as 5 repetitions in the first 2 weeks and 10 repetitions in the last 2 weeks. Strengthening exercises will be performed with an elastic band and free weights. Strengthening exercises will be started as 2 sets of 5 repetitions and at the end of the second week, it will be applied as 2 sets of 10 repetitions. In addition to these exercises, glenohumeral distraction, glenohumeral posterior and caudal glide will be applied for joint mobilization and it will show progression at the end of the second week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being diagnosed with unilateral adhesive capsulitis (stage II-III)
- Being between at the ages of 35-65
- Complaints ongoing for at least 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- Rheumatological diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis
- Being diagnosed with glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis, rotator cuff injury, radiculopathy
- Neurological diseases such as cerebrovascular accident, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, thoracic outlet syndrome
- Dislocation, subluxation, fracture, infection, tumor
- History of shoulder surgery
- People who cannot cooperate with physiotherapist and exercises.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa
Istanbul, 34500, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (14)
Celik D, Kaya Mutlu E. Does adding mobilization to stretching improve outcomes for people with frozen shoulder? A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016 Aug;30(8):786-94. doi: 10.1177/0269215515597294. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
PMID: 26229109BACKGROUNDMulligan EP, Brunette M, Shirley Z, Khazzam M. Sleep quality and nocturnal pain in patients with shoulder disorders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
PMID: 25842028BACKGROUNDFernandes MR. Correlation between functional disability and quality of life in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Acta Ortop Bras. 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):81-4. doi: 10.1590/1413-78522015230200791.
PMID: 27069405BACKGROUNDBalci NC, Yuruk ZO, Zeybek A, Gulsen M, Tekindal MA. Acute effect of scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) techniques and classic exercises in adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Apr;28(4):1219-27. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.1219. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
PMID: 27190456BACKGROUNDShimura K, Kasai T. Effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on the initiation of voluntary movement and motor evoked potentials in upper limb muscles. Hum Mov Sci. 2002 Apr;21(1):101-13. doi: 10.1016/s0167-9457(01)00057-4.
PMID: 11983436BACKGROUNDToprak M, Erden M. Sleep quality, pain, anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with frozen shoulder1. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(2):287-291. doi: 10.3233/BMR-171010.
PMID: 30347591BACKGROUNDLevine WN, Kashyap CP, Bak SF, Ahmad CS, Blaine TA, Bigliani LU. Nonoperative management of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;16(5):569-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.12.007. Epub 2007 May 24.
PMID: 17531513BACKGROUNDBeaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001 Apr-Jun;14(2):128-46.
PMID: 11382253BACKGROUNDHayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZR, Murrell GA. Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(4):289-94. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60274-9.
PMID: 11722295BACKGROUNDKibler WB, Sciascia A. Evaluation and Management of Scapular Dyskinesis in Overhead Athletes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Dec;12(4):515-526. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09591-1.
PMID: 31760624BACKGROUNDAger AL, Roy JS, Roos M, Belley AF, Cools A, Hebert LJ. Shoulder proprioception: How is it measured and is it reliable? A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2017 Apr-Jun;30(2):221-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.003.
PMID: 28641738BACKGROUNDDevelopment of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):551-8. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798006667.
PMID: 9626712BACKGROUNDKamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163.
PMID: 20046623BACKGROUNDRoach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res. 1991 Dec;4(4):143-9.
PMID: 11188601BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yonca Zenginler Yazgan, Assistant Professor
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Evaluations will be made by a single investigator and participants will be blinded to what treatment is being administered.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2021
First Posted
May 10, 2021
Study Start
February 3, 2021
Primary Completion
August 3, 2021
Study Completion
November 10, 2021
Last Updated
May 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Demographic informations such as age, gender, height, weight, occupation Results of range of motion, pain severity, function, proprioception, sleep quality, quality of life assessments will be shared with other researches.