PPI to Promote the Psychological Well-being of Children Living in Poverty
The Use of a Positive Psychology Intervention (PPI) to Promote the Psychological Well-being of Children Living in Poverty: a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Positive psychology interventions use positive psychology techniques to identify meaning and value in life events to raise positive feelings and emotions. Application of PPIs has steadily increased in clinical and non-clinical samples. However, that meta-analysis did not include any study in a Chinese population, and it remains unclear whether PPIs are applicable in the Hong Kong Chinese context.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2023
CompletedApril 19, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.7 years
April 20, 2021
April 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (19)
Screening rate
The number of children screened by the RA divided by the number of children available for screening during the recruitment period.
At baseline
Eligibility rate
The number of eligible children divided by the number of screened children
At baseline
Consent rate
The number of eligible children who consent to participate divided by the number of eligible children
At baseline
Randomization rate
The number of children randomized to the experimental and control groups divided by the number of consenting children
At baseline
Intervention attendance rate
The number of participants in the experimental group who complete the intervention divided by the number of participants randomized into the group
Immediately after the training workshop
Intervention attendance rate at 1-week follow-up
The number of participants in the experimental group who complete the intervention divided by the number of participants randomized into the group
At 1-week follow-up
Adherence to the intervention protocol at 1-week follow-up
The number of participants in the experimental group who practice the skills gained divided by the number of participants randomized into the group
At 1-week follow-up
Retention rate at 6-month follow-up
The number of participants who remain in this study divided by the number of randomized participants, calculated by group at each follow-up
At 6-month follow-up
Completion rate at 6-month follow-up
The number of participants who return the questionnaires divided by the number of questionnaires distributed
At 6-month follow-up
Missing data at baseline
The percentage of missing in the dataset
At baseline
Missing data at 1-week follow-up
The percentage of missing in the dataset
At 1-week follow-up
Missing data at 1-month follow-up
The percentage of missing in the dataset
At 1-month follow-up
Missing data at 3-month follow-up
The percentage of missing in the dataset
At 3-month follow-up
Missing data at 6-month follow-up
The percentage of missing in the dataset
At 6-month follow-up
Adverse events at baseline
unfavorable and unintended events
At baseline
Adverse events at 1-week follow-up
unfavorable and unintended events
At 1-week follow-up
Adverse events at 1-month follow-up
unfavorable and unintended events
At 1-month follow-up
Adverse events at 3-month follow-up
unfavorable and unintended events
At 3-month follow-up
Adverse events at 6-month follow-up
unfavorable and unintended events
At 6-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Chinese version of the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale at 6-month follow-up
At 6-month follow-up
Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory at 6-month follow-up
At 6-month follow-up
Chinese version of The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children at 6-month follow-up
At 6-month follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Positive psychology
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe experimental group(n=60), who will receive a 1.5-hour workshop covering positive psychology techniques delivered by a qualified research assistant, in groups of less than 5 people.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will receive no intervention.
Interventions
This intervention aim to examine the effectiveness of PPI in reducing depressive symptoms, enhancing self-esteem, and promoting quality of life among Chinese children who are living in poverty. Participants in the experimental group will receive a 1.5 hour workshop on 4 positive psychology techniques, including (1) gratitude visit/letters, (2) 3 good things, (3) you at your best, and (4) using signature strengths. A booster intervention will be given at 1-week follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age from 13-17
- Can read Chinese and speak Cantonese
You may not qualify if:
- with identified cognitive and/or behavioral problem(s)
- with identified mental problem(s)
- participating in any mental health service/programme and/or receiving any psychiatric medication.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ka Yan Ho
Hong Kong, Hong Kong,China, 000, Hong Kong
Related Publications (1)
Ho KY, Lam KKW, Bressington DT, Lin J, Mak YW, Wu C, Li WHC. Use of a positive psychology intervention (PPI) to promote the psychological well-being of children living in poverty: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):e055506. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055506.
PMID: 35977772DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eva Ho, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2021
First Posted
May 6, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2021
Primary Completion
August 30, 2023
Study Completion
August 30, 2023
Last Updated
April 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share