Behavior Problems Prevention Using the Online Triple P Parenting Program
TriplePChile
1 other identifier
interventional
1,920
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Triple P program is a comprehensive system of parenting and family support of multilevel preventive intervention, developed for families with members up to 16 years of age, whose objective is to improve parenting skills and prevent or modify dysfunctional parenting practices, thus reducing Family risk factors that affect both child abuse, behavioral problems and emotional problems.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 6, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2022
CompletedNovember 1, 2021
October 1, 2021
1.7 years
April 21, 2021
October 29, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Acceptability of the program by parents/main caregivers using the Acceptability Scale (AS)
A questionnaire exploring the acceptability of the program will be answered by parents/main caregivers of students attending Grade 1 to Grade 4, Primary school, who will participate in the intervention. This questionnaire asks about the parents´opinions about the content of the intervention, strategies used, materials, and performance of the health professional helping in the intervention.The latter is only applicable for parents participating in "Group Triple-p online with professional support". The questionnaire also asks about satisfaction and the helpfulness of the program to improve parenting management. For each statement, the answers can go from 1=Strongly disagree to 5=Strongly agree. A high score means higher acceptably and satisfacción with the program. This is a questionnaire created by the research team.
Inmediately Post-intervention
Feasibility of the program using the Feasibility Inventory (FI)
A register will be used to determine the number of schools initially contacted and the number of schools that accepted to participate; number of parents/main caregivers contacted and that consented and assented to participate in the study at baseline and at follow-up; the number of sessions completed by parents in the platform, the number of telephone contacts delivered by the health professionals, the number of meeting over the phone conducted with parents. This Feasibility Inventory (FI) was created by the research team. This registry will not produce a score, rather it will provide indicators to achievements for several areas of the implementation of the program.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Parenting Scale (PS)
One month
Parenting Task Checklist (PTC)
One month
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)
One month
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
2 months
Study Arms (3)
Triple P online with professional support
EXPERIMENTALIn the online version with professional support, the psychologist in charge will have the role of monitoring the autonomous work of the participants during the 8 sessions, as well as answering questions and doubts that the participants may have regarding the program and its implementation.
Triple P online without professional support
EXPERIMENTALIn the version without professional support, the role of the psychologist in charge will be to keep the platform updated so that the person who self-administers the intervention does not have technical problems associated with the platform.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONControl group without any intervention.
Interventions
The psychologist in charge will have the role of monitoring the autonomous work of the participants during the 8 sessions. The psychologist in charge will also verify that the participants are able to complete the online modules week by week, that they understand the contents taught in the module and that they are practicing the tasks and exercises assigned in each of the modules; in addition to generating an action plan in case the participants are not adhering week by week to the self-administration of the program. The follow-up and contact with the families will be carried out by phone and through a weekly email-type messaging system, implemented within the same platform on which the program material is found
The role of the psychologist in charge will be to keep the platform updated so that the person who self-administers the intervention does not have technical problems associated with the platform.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Belong to one of the three socio-economic levels according to SIMCE classification (High, Medium and Low).
- Attend to a primary school of the Municipality of Lo Barnechea, Santiago, Chile.
- Previous participation in the instruments validations stages.
- Identification in The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) with behavior problems above the 80th percentile.
- Have Internet access.
You may not qualify if:
- Attend to a school that is developing or implementing a manualized program for parents associated with the prevention of behavioral problems
- Participating in a similar study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad de los Andes
Santiago, Las Condes, 7620001, Chile
Related Publications (4)
Sanders MR, Baker S, Turner KM. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of Triple P Online with parents of children with early-onset conduct problems. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Nov;50(11):675-84. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Aug 18.
PMID: 22982082RESULTArnold DS, O'Leary SG, Wolff LS, Acker MM. The Parenting Scale: A measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment. 1993; 5(2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.137
RESULTGoodman R, Scott S. Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: is small beautiful? J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1999 Feb;27(1):17-24. doi: 10.1023/a:1022658222914.
PMID: 10197403RESULTSanders MR, Woolley ML. The relationship between maternal self-efficacy and parenting practices: implications for parent training. Child Care Health Dev. 2005 Jan;31(1):65-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00487.x.
PMID: 15658967RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- In all the assessments, the principal investigator and research assistants will be blind to the trial arm where the schools/students were allocated
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2021
First Posted
May 5, 2021
Study Start
April 6, 2021
Primary Completion
December 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 30, 2022
Last Updated
November 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10