BTL Emsella Chair Versus Sham for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder
EmsellaOAB
A Single-Blind, Randomized Study of the BTL EmsellaTM Chair Versus Sham for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder
1 other identifier
interventional
166
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the Emsella Chair therapy to Sham and to determine whether electromagnetic technology is effective in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). Currently there are no other studies utilizing the Emsella Chair for the treatment of OAB. Eligible subjects will receive 2 treatments per week for a total of 4 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2028
December 11, 2025
December 1, 2025
6.5 years
April 29, 2021
December 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair versus Sham by evaluating the proportion of subjects reporting "moderately improved" or "markedly improved" responses on the Global Response Assessment (GRA) for overall bladder symptoms.
The GRA evaluates the patients' perceptions of overall improvement in symptoms on a 7-point scale (markedly worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, unchanged, slightly improved, moderately improved, markedly improved).
4 weeks after completing all treatments; week 8 of the study
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Compare the efficacy of Emsella chair versus Sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported urinary urgency, frequency, and leakage episodes as reported in a 3-day voiding diary.
4 weeks after completing all treatments; week 8 of the study
Compare the efficacy of Emsella chair versus Sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported overactive bladder symptoms as measured by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short form (OAB-q).
4 weeks after completing all treatments; week 8 of the study
Compare the efficacy of Emsella chair versus Sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported impact of urinary incontinence on daily life as measured by the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QOL).
4 weeks after completing all treatments; week 8 of the study
Compare the efficacy of Emsella chair versus Sham by evaluating the change in subject-reported OAB symptoms (urinary incontinence, urinary urgency, urinary frequency) since start of the study as measured by Global Response Assessment (GRA)
4 weeks after completing all treatments; week 8 of the study
Compare the efficacy of Emsella chair versus Sham by the change in subject-reported fecal incontinence as measured by the Wexner Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (Wexner Scale).
4 weeks after completing all treatments; week 8 of the study
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Emsella Chair Active Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive subjects will be asked to sit on the center of the device and the height will be adjusted until the subject's feet are on the floor. The active treatments are individualized, since some subjects will be more sensitive than others. The Emsella chair will be turned on and the setting gradually increased to the subject's sensory threshold; the maximum sensation the subject can tolerate. The setting will be decreased slightly and stay unchanged for the reminder of the treatment. The treatment threshold should be increased with every treatment until the subject reaches 100%.
Emsella Chair Sham Treatment
PLACEBO COMPARATORSham treatment subjects will be positioned on the device in the same manner. The sham treatment will provide some sensation without active HIFEM technology. The programming for the sham treatment will have an amplitude limitation, with the setting below the therapeutic level (less than 10% power).
Interventions
The Emsella Chair is a novel high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) technology for the treatment of pelvic floor related disorders. HIFEM technology induces deep pelvic floor muscle contractions designed to deliver the equivalent of 11,200 Kegel exercises over 28 minutes. The treatment paradigm consists of 3 different phases. The phases consist of an intense stimulation of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM), which consists of stimulation and relaxation. The repetition of the phases and focused electromagnetic energy delivery leads to pelvic floor stimulation, adaptation, and remodelation.
The sham treatment will provide some sensation without active HIFEM technology. The programming for the sham treatment will have an amplitude limitation, with the setting below therapeutic level (less than 10%) power.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to read, understand, and provide written, dated, informed consent prior to screening, and be likely to comply with study protocol, including independently complete study questionnaires and communicate with study personnel about AEs and other clinically important information.
- Women and men ≥ 18 years of age
- Self-reported bladder symptoms present ≥ 3 months
- Self-reported failed conservative care of behavioral modifications and/or oral medications
- On a stable dose of antimuscarinics/beta-3 agonists for ≥ 4 weeks, and willing to remain on the medication for the duration of the study OR discontinued antimuscarinics/beta-3 agonists for ≥ 2 weeks
- Ambulatory and able to use a toilet independently, without difficulty
- Subject agrees not to start any new treatment for OAB (medication or otherwise) during the treatment and follow-up periods.
- For Females Only:
- If of child-bearing age and female, agree to practice approved birth-control methods (oral contraceptives, condom barrier, injection, diaphragm or cervical cap, vaginal contraceptive ring, IUD, implantable contraceptive, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation), vasectomized partner(s))
You may not qualify if:
- Botox® use in bladder or pelvic floor muscles in the past year
- Subject weighs greater than 330 pounds
- Pulmonary insufficiency, defined as difficulty breathing and fatigue, especially during exercise; chest pain, such as squeezing, pressure of tightness; the sensation of rapid or irregular heartbeat (palpitations); swelling of the legs or feet; dizziness or fainting; and/or bluish discoloration of the nails and/or lips (cyanosis)
- Any condition that causes a lack of normal skin sensation to the pelvis, buttocks, and thighs, at the discretion of the investigator.
- Subject has a piercing between the waist and knees and is not willing to remove it before each treatment
- Active urethral diverticula
- Known vesicoureteral reflux
- Currently healing from surgical procedures where muscle contraction may disrupt the healing process
- Subject is currently receiving treatment for a malignant tumor that would interfere with study participation. Skin cancers are permitted.
- Subject has used the BTL EMSELLA device previously
- Subject has urinary incontinence of neurogenic etiology, such as multiple sclerosis, spina bifida, Parkinson's, spinal cord injury, diabetic neuropathy, neurogenic bladder etc.
- Current urinary tract infection. If a subject has a confirmed symptomatic UTI at screening, per investigator's clinical judgment, they will be deferred from screening until treatment is completed, and may resume once symptoms have resolved
- Current use of neuromodulation therapy, including interstim and PTNS, for bladder symptoms within 3 months of screening visit (if past sacral/pudendal implant, must be explanted)
- Currently participating in an investigational study that may impact study results or previously received an investigational drug or treatment within 30 days of the Screening Visit
- Current or history of any physical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, might put the subject at risk or interfere with study results interpretation
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth Peters, MD
Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The sham Emsella treatment will provide sensation without active HIFEM technology. The sham treatment amplitude setting will be limited to below the therapeutic level.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director and Chair of the Department of Urology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2021
First Posted
May 5, 2021
Study Start
November 22, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Last Updated
December 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share