Study Stopped
Due to low enrollment and lack of efficiency
Emsella Chair Versus Sham for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain
EmsellaPain
A Single-Blind, Randomized Study of the BTL Emsella Chair Versus Sham for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the Emsella Chair therapy to Sham and to determine whether electromagnetic technology is effective in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Currently there are no other studies utilizing the Emsella Chair for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Eligible subjects will receive 2 treatments per week for a total of 4 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 18, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 13, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 21, 2023
CompletedSeptember 21, 2023
August 1, 2023
2.5 years
January 27, 2020
July 21, 2023
August 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Change in Subject-reported Pain and Discomfort as Measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Mean change in Pain VAS from baseline to end of treatment will be compared between the Emsella Chair group and the sham group. VAS is scored from 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Value at week 8 minus the value at baseline was used to calculate change. Negative numbers indicate an improvement in pain, and positive numbers indicate a worsening pain.
Baseline and week 8
Secondary Outcomes (14)
The Change in Subject-reported Impression of CPP Severity as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Severity Scale (PGI-S).
Baseline and week 12
The Number of Participants Reporting Significant Symptom Improvement as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale (PGI-I)
at 12 weeks
The Change in Subject-reported Impression of CPP Severity as Measured by Subject-reported Pelvic Floor Tenderness to Palpation During 4 Quadrant Pelvic Examination as Measured by VAS.
Baseline and week 12
The Change in Subject-reported Impression of CPP Severity in Females.
Baseline and Week 12
The Change in Subject-reported Impression of CPP Severity in Males.
Baseline and week 12
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Emsella Chair Active Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will be asked to sit on the device and the height will be adjusted until the subject's feet are on the floor. The active treatments are individualized, since some subjects will be more sensitive than others. The Emsella Chair will be turned on and the setting gradually increased to the subject's sensory threshold; the maximum sensation the subject can tolerate. The setting will be decreased slightly and stay unchanged for the remainder of the treatment. The treatment threshold should be increased with every treatment until the subject reaches 100%.
Emsella Sham Treatment
SHAM COMPARATORSham treatment subjects will be positioned on the device in the same manner. The sham treatment will provide some sensation without active HIFEM technology. The programming for the sham treatment will have an amplitude limitation, with the setting below the therapeutic level (\<10% power).
Interventions
Subjects will sit on the device. The Research Nurse Coordinator (RNC) will turn the device on and increase the setting gradually until the patient reaches their sensory threshold. This is the maximum sensation the patient can tolerate. The treatment threshold should be increased with every treatment until the subject reaches 100%.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to read, understand, and provide written, dated, informed consent prior to screening, and be likely to comply with study protocol, including independently complete study questionnaires and communicate with study personnel about adverse events (AEs) and other clinically important information.
- Females and males, 18 to 80 years of age, at screening
- Self-reported CPP defined as pelvic pain that is non-cyclical and of at least 6 months duration and refractory to other treatments
- Subject agrees not to start any new treatment for CPP (medication or otherwise) during the treatment and follow-up periods.
- Subject agrees to maintain a stable dose all current medications throughout the treatment and follow-up period
- For Females Only:
- If of child-bearing age and female, agree to practice approved birth-control methods (oral contraceptives, condom barrier, injection, diaphragm or cervical cap, vaginal contraceptive ring, Intrauterine device (IUD), implantable contraceptive, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation), vasectomized partner(s))
You may not qualify if:
- Pelvic floor physical therapy, including muscle training and/or electrostimulation, in a clinical setting within 30 days prior to screening.
- Pelvic floor trigger point injections, pudendal nerve block, or bladder hydrodistention within 30 days prior to screening
- Subject weighs more than 330 pounds
- Current urinary tract infection (UTI). If a subject has a confirmed symptomatic UTI at screening, per the investigator's clinical judgment, they will be deferred from screening until treatment is completed, and may resume once symptoms have resolved.
- Pulmonary insufficiency, defined as difficulty breathing and fatigue, especially during exercise; heartbeat (palpitations); swelling of the legs or feet; dizziness or fainting; and/or bluish discoloration of the nails and/or lips (cyanosis)
- Subject is currently receiving treatment for a malignant tumor that would interfere with study participation.
- Any condition that causes a lack of normal skin sensation to the pelvis, buttocks, and lower extremities
- History of Hunner's lesion in the medical record
- Subject has a piercing between the waist and knees and is not willing to remove it before each treatment
- Subject has used the BTL EMSELLA device previously
- Currently participating in an investigational study that may impact study results or previously received an investigational drug or treatment within 30 days of the Screening Visit
- Current or history of any physical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, might put the subject at risk or interfere with study results interpretation
- For Females Only:
- Pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, at screening or anytime throughout the study period
- Note: For the sake of preserving scientific integrity, one or more of the eligibility criteria have been left off the list posted while the trial is ongoing. A full list of eligibility criteria will be posted upon completion of the trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was terminated early due to lack of efficacy at an interim analysis point.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director Urology Research
- Organization
- Beaumont Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth Peters, MD
Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The sham Emsella treatment will provide sensation without active HIFEM technology. The sham treatment amplitude setting will be limited to below the therapeutic level.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director and Chair of the Department of Urology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2020
First Posted
January 30, 2020
Study Start
July 13, 2020
Primary Completion
January 18, 2023
Study Completion
July 13, 2023
Last Updated
September 21, 2023
Results First Posted
September 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share