Sponsor study identifier
observational
408
1 country
1
Study Start
January 21, 2021
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
September 1, 2022
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 1, 2022
Actual (reported)To assess the influence that the complications of implant treatment have on the patient's perception and satisfaction on treatment.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
September 1, 2022
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
January 21, 2021
Actual (reported)April 25, 2021
Actual (reported)May 3, 2021
Actual (reported)September 1, 2022
Actual (reported)September 1, 2022
Actual (reported)Patient´s pain perception
The degree of pain perceived by the patient after the onset of the complication by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) form 0 to 10, being 0 "No pain" and 10 "Very painful".
Day 0
Functional impairment
The impact of complication on functional impairment by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) form 0 to 10, being 0 "Not affected" and 10 "Very affected".
Day 0
Degree of Concern
The degree of concern that the complication generates in the patient by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) form 0 to 10, being 0 "Not concerned" and 10 "Very concerned".
Day 0
Quality of life (QoL)
Patient perception of the impact of the complication on their quality of life by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) form 0 to 10, being 0 "Not affected" and 10 "Very affected".
Day 0
Degree of Confidence
The impact that the complication has had on the patient's confidence in dental implant treatment using a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10, with 0 being "Confident that they will not receive any further dental implant treatment" and 10 being "Confident that they will".
Any patients with biological or mechanical complication in dental implant treatment.
Patients who receive one o more dental implant treatment to restore oral function.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
All the patients who present dental implant complication in any of the center in the study.
Clínica Dental Esteve
Alicante, 03001, Spain
Brunello G, Gervasi M, Ricci S, Tomasi C, Bressan E. Patients' perceptions of implant therapy and maintenance: A questionnaire-based survey. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Oct;31(10):917-927. doi: 10.1111/clr.13634. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
Derks J, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Klinge B, Berglundh T. Patient-reported outcomes of dental implant therapy in a large randomly selected sample. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 May;26(5):586-91. doi: 10.1111/clr.12464. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
Guillem Esteve-Pardo, DDS
Aula Dental Avanzada
408 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
April 25, 2021
First Posted
May 3, 2021
Study Start
January 21, 2021
Actual (reported)Immediate Implant Using an Inverted Co-Axis at 12º Versus a Conventional Conical Implant
Day 0
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Insua A, Monje A, Wang HL, Inglehart M. Patient-Centered Perspectives and Understanding of Peri-Implantitis. J Periodontol. 2017 Nov;88(11):1153-1162. doi: 10.1902/jop.2017.160796. Epub 2017 May 26.
Karlsson K, Derks J, Wennstrom JL, Petzold M, Berglundh T. Occurrence and clustering of complications in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Oct;31(10):1002-1009. doi: 10.1111/clr.13647. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
Primary Completion
September 1, 2022
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 1, 2022
Actual (reported)Last Updated
April 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: