NCT04867070

Brief Summary

Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) is a safe procedure and rapid wound healing, affecting the quality of life. The physiology of postoperative pain after LLDN has been attributed to reasons such as tissue damage, residual pneumoperitoneum, and diaphragm irritation. In terms of patient comfort after LLDN, pain control is provided by IV analgesics, local anesthetic injection instead of incision, and regional techniques. Regional anesthesia techniques for postoperative pain control have become popular in recent years. Today, many blocks are performed with ultrasonography (USG) to reduce the severity of pain after laparoscopic and open surgeries. In 2016, Forero et al. erector spinae plane block (ESPB) had been defined and used successfully in thoracic and abdominal surgeries. In our clinic, peripheral nerve blocks such as intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and ESPB are applied for postoperative analgesia. The method of analgesia is suitable for the surgery and explained to the patients. This study; In LLDN operations, it was aimed to compare the bilateral ESP block performed with USG in terms of postoperative pain scores and opioid analgesic consumption compared to patients without any block. Before the operation, the anesthesiologist in charge of the anesthesia outpatient clinic provides information about both anesthesia and postoperative pain management methods suitable for surgery. This is the standard practice in our clinic. Before anesthesia, anesthesia and analgesia methods will be briefly reminded to the patient who has come for the operation. He/she will be asked if he/she wants to apply postoperative analgesia. Block procedure will be applied to patients who want ESP block. Standard analgesia will be applied to all patients. Regardless of the study, patients who underwent LLDN operation will be interviewed in the postoperative period with or without an ESP block for postoperative analgesia. The data and postoperative evaluations of the patients who agreed to participate in the study will be recorded for study purposes. The patient data will be taken from the hospital registration system.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 27, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 27, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 30, 2021

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 27, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

pain managementlaparoscopic living-donor nephrectomyerector spinae plane block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain score

    Pain scores between the two groups will be compared

    in 24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The total consumption of analgesic drugs

    in 24 hours

Study Arms (2)

LLDN with ESPB

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patient will be interviewed for participation in the study, and the pain scores of the patients who will participate in the study will be recorded according to the NAS and W-BAS scores at the first, 2nd, 12th, and 24th hours. At the end of the 24th hour, analgesic consumption will be recorded.

Diagnostic Test: NAS score

LLDN without ESPB

NO INTERVENTION

The patient will be interviewed for participation in the study, and the pain scores of the patients who will participate in the study will be recorded according to the NAS and W-BAS scores at the first, 2nd, 12th, and 24th hours. At the end of the 24th hour, analgesic consumption will be recorded.

Interventions

NAS scoreDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Participants will be recorded according to the NAS and W-BAS pain scores

Also known as: W-BAS score
LLDN with ESPB

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients aged 18-75 who were operated on under general anesthesia for LLDN surgery and agreed to participate in the study will be included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants who did not accept the study, had intraoperative complications, and whose laparoscopic operation was canceled will not be included in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Akdeniz University Hospital

Antalya, 07070, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Hosgood SA, Thiyagarajan UM, Nicholson HF, Jeyapalan I, Nicholson ML. Randomized clinical trial of transversus abdominis plane block versus placebo control in live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2012 Sep 15;94(5):520-5. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31825c1697.

    PMID: 22902793BACKGROUND
  • Hacibeyoglu G, Topal A, Arican S, Kilicaslan A, Tekin A, Uzun ST. USG guided bilateral erector spinae plane block is an effective and safe postoperative analgesia method for living donor liver transplantation. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:36-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29883965BACKGROUND
  • Daghmouri MA, Akremi S, Chaouch MA, Mesbahi M, Amouri N, Jaoua H, Ben Fadhel K. Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Pract. 2021 Mar;21(3):357-365. doi: 10.1111/papr.12953. Epub 2020 Oct 25.

    PMID: 32979028BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeAgnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNervous System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: After the application of the ESPB was explained to the volunteers, a block was applied if the patients provided their consent. The donors were randomly assigned to Group B (ESPB group) or Group C (control group) using computer-generated random numbers placed in separate closed envelopes that the study investigator opened before performing the block in the operation room.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2021

First Posted

April 30, 2021

Study Start

April 27, 2021

Primary Completion

November 27, 2021

Study Completion

December 1, 2021

Last Updated

July 29, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Locations