NCT04861129

Brief Summary

There is emerging evidence that Bowen Therapy may improve musculoskeletal pain. While it can be an effective treatment strategy to enhance pain modulation; studies on the clinical effect are scarce. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of Bowen therapy for people with chronic LBP on measures of pain, function, pain-related self-efficacy, and health related quality of life. Parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) study will be employed. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be adopted as a screening test upon the randomization. A cutoff of more than 30 points will be used to represents clinically relevant level of catastrophizing. 46 participants with informed consent who meet the eligibility criteria of study are recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups i.e. Bowen Therapy group and Sham Bowen Conventional Therapy group. Permuted block randomization is applied to control the key confounding variable of catastrophizing which is significantly associated with pain and disability in chronic LBP. Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE) is used to ensure the allocation sequence before the group allocation. Double blinding of participants and outcome assessor will be adopted. Measurements are collected at the baseline (Week 0), post-intervention (Week 6) and at a 4-week follow-up (Week 10). The primary outcomes are pain as measured by Percentage of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) and pain relief scale (PRS). The secondary outcomes are measuring the physical functioning, self-efficacy in pain and HRQoL using Owestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and SF-12 (HK) respectively. Intervention is provided weekly for 6 sessions lasting 30-40 minutes per treatment session. The experimental group will receive Bowen therapy according to ISBT Bowen Therapy®. The control group will receive a usual OT therapy with the same number of treatment session, treatment time, including back care advice and functional rehab training.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 17, 2021

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 19, 2021

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 27, 2021

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 27, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

April 17, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Bowen therapyFasciaLow back pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Change of Percentage of Pain Intensity

    11-point scale by reporting a number from 0 - 10, with "0' representing "no pain" and "10" representing the "most intense pain imaginable". Therefore, the change in pain intensity is expressed as the percentage of pain intensity difference (%PID), which converts the raw score change to a proportional measure i.e. pain intensity difference between the assessments / Pain NRS at baseline assessment. (Score: 0 - 100%)

    Week 6 (compared to Week 0)

  • Change of Percentage of Pain Intensity

    11-point scale by reporting a number from 0 - 10, with "0' representing "no pain" and "10" representing the "most intense pain imaginable". Therefore, the change in pain intensity is expressed as the percentage of pain intensity difference (%PID), which converts the raw score change to a proportional measure i.e. pain intensity difference between the assessments / Pain NRS at baseline assessment. (Score: 0 - 100%)

    Week 10 (compared to Week 0)

  • Pain relief scale

    11-point scale with "0" representing "no relief of pain" and "10" representing "completely relieved" to measure the magnitude of change in pain intensity after the treatment. (Score: 0 - 100%)

    Week 0

  • Pain relief scale

    11-point scale with "0" representing "no relief of pain" and "10" representing "completely relieved" to measure the magnitude of change in pain intensity after the treatment. (Score: 0 - 100%)

    Week 6

  • Pain relief scale

    11-point scale with "0" representing "no relief of pain" and "10" representing "completely relieved" to measure the magnitude of change in pain intensity after the treatment. (Score: 0 - 100%)

    Week 10

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Owestry Disability Index

    Week 0

  • Owestry Disability Index

    Week 6

  • Owestry Disability Index

    Week 10

  • Chinese version of Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire

    Week 0

  • Chinese version of Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire

    Week 6

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Bowen therapy group

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental group will receive Bowen therapy according to ISBT Bowen Therapy® (Black \& Murray, 2005). It may include sequences 1, 4, 2, hamstrings (movements 1-6) and sacrum sequences in the prone position, and hamstrings sequence (7-18 movements) and 3 in the supine position,. The sequences may also include Bowen movements in the scalenes, trapezius, all erector spinae, sacro-iliac joint ligaments, gluteus maximus and medius, tensor fasciae latae, and gastrocnemius. The application of Bowen sequences is varied between sessions and participants depending on the presenting functional deficit and treatment response.

Procedure: Bowen therapy

Sham Bowen Therapy group

SHAM COMPARATOR

The control group will receive a sham Bowen therapy with the same number of treatment session, treatment time and rest time, that received in the experimental group. However, it consists of gently placing the hands over the areas just enough to maintain contact for the desired time as required by Bowen Therapy, without applying Bowen movement, which is considered the active principle of this technique.

Procedure: Sham Bowen therapy

Interventions

Bowen therapyPROCEDURE

Intervention is provided weekly for 6 sessions lasting 30-40 mins per treatment session

Bowen therapy group

Sham Intervention is provided weekly for 6 sessions lasting 30-40 mins per treatment session

Sham Bowen Therapy group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ages between 18 and 65 years
  • a diagnosis of low back pain with onset \> 12 weeks based on the evaluation by physician
  • average pain intensity score of ≥ 3 on NPRS.

You may not qualify if:

  • they have acute disc prolapse or protusion with neurological sign and symptoms in the past 3-months;
  • bacterial spondylitis;
  • Rheumatoid arthritis;
  • ankylosing spondylitis;
  • back pain secondary to bone malignancy
  • spinal fracture;
  • osteoporotic collapse;
  • cauda equina compression
  • prior spinal surgery;
  • psychiatric disorder (e.g. psychosis / delusion);
  • current pregnancy
  • previous experience with Bowen therapy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

United Christian Hospital

Kwun Tong, Hong Kong

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Back PainLow Back Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Andy S.K. Cheng, PhD

    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double blinding of participants and outcome assessor will be adopted. Independent assessors who conduct outcome measures are blinded to the group assignments, so allocation concealment and masking can be preserved throughout the study.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2021

First Posted

April 27, 2021

Study Start

April 19, 2021

Primary Completion

September 30, 2021

Study Completion

June 30, 2022

Last Updated

April 27, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations