Bowen Therapy for Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is emerging evidence that Bowen Therapy may improve musculoskeletal pain. While it can be an effective treatment strategy to enhance pain modulation; studies on the clinical effect are scarce. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of Bowen therapy for people with chronic LBP on measures of pain, function, pain-related self-efficacy, and health related quality of life. Parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) study will be employed. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be adopted as a screening test upon the randomization. A cutoff of more than 30 points will be used to represents clinically relevant level of catastrophizing. 46 participants with informed consent who meet the eligibility criteria of study are recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups i.e. Bowen Therapy group and Sham Bowen Conventional Therapy group. Permuted block randomization is applied to control the key confounding variable of catastrophizing which is significantly associated with pain and disability in chronic LBP. Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE) is used to ensure the allocation sequence before the group allocation. Double blinding of participants and outcome assessor will be adopted. Measurements are collected at the baseline (Week 0), post-intervention (Week 6) and at a 4-week follow-up (Week 10). The primary outcomes are pain as measured by Percentage of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) and pain relief scale (PRS). The secondary outcomes are measuring the physical functioning, self-efficacy in pain and HRQoL using Owestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and SF-12 (HK) respectively. Intervention is provided weekly for 6 sessions lasting 30-40 minutes per treatment session. The experimental group will receive Bowen therapy according to ISBT Bowen Therapy®. The control group will receive a usual OT therapy with the same number of treatment session, treatment time, including back care advice and functional rehab training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 17, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedApril 27, 2021
April 1, 2021
5 months
April 17, 2021
April 22, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change of Percentage of Pain Intensity
11-point scale by reporting a number from 0 - 10, with "0' representing "no pain" and "10" representing the "most intense pain imaginable". Therefore, the change in pain intensity is expressed as the percentage of pain intensity difference (%PID), which converts the raw score change to a proportional measure i.e. pain intensity difference between the assessments / Pain NRS at baseline assessment. (Score: 0 - 100%)
Week 6 (compared to Week 0)
Change of Percentage of Pain Intensity
11-point scale by reporting a number from 0 - 10, with "0' representing "no pain" and "10" representing the "most intense pain imaginable". Therefore, the change in pain intensity is expressed as the percentage of pain intensity difference (%PID), which converts the raw score change to a proportional measure i.e. pain intensity difference between the assessments / Pain NRS at baseline assessment. (Score: 0 - 100%)
Week 10 (compared to Week 0)
Pain relief scale
11-point scale with "0" representing "no relief of pain" and "10" representing "completely relieved" to measure the magnitude of change in pain intensity after the treatment. (Score: 0 - 100%)
Week 0
Pain relief scale
11-point scale with "0" representing "no relief of pain" and "10" representing "completely relieved" to measure the magnitude of change in pain intensity after the treatment. (Score: 0 - 100%)
Week 6
Pain relief scale
11-point scale with "0" representing "no relief of pain" and "10" representing "completely relieved" to measure the magnitude of change in pain intensity after the treatment. (Score: 0 - 100%)
Week 10
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Owestry Disability Index
Week 0
Owestry Disability Index
Week 6
Owestry Disability Index
Week 10
Chinese version of Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire
Week 0
Chinese version of Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire
Week 6
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Bowen therapy group
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will receive Bowen therapy according to ISBT Bowen Therapy® (Black \& Murray, 2005). It may include sequences 1, 4, 2, hamstrings (movements 1-6) and sacrum sequences in the prone position, and hamstrings sequence (7-18 movements) and 3 in the supine position,. The sequences may also include Bowen movements in the scalenes, trapezius, all erector spinae, sacro-iliac joint ligaments, gluteus maximus and medius, tensor fasciae latae, and gastrocnemius. The application of Bowen sequences is varied between sessions and participants depending on the presenting functional deficit and treatment response.
Sham Bowen Therapy group
SHAM COMPARATORThe control group will receive a sham Bowen therapy with the same number of treatment session, treatment time and rest time, that received in the experimental group. However, it consists of gently placing the hands over the areas just enough to maintain contact for the desired time as required by Bowen Therapy, without applying Bowen movement, which is considered the active principle of this technique.
Interventions
Intervention is provided weekly for 6 sessions lasting 30-40 mins per treatment session
Sham Intervention is provided weekly for 6 sessions lasting 30-40 mins per treatment session
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ages between 18 and 65 years
- a diagnosis of low back pain with onset \> 12 weeks based on the evaluation by physician
- average pain intensity score of ≥ 3 on NPRS.
You may not qualify if:
- they have acute disc prolapse or protusion with neurological sign and symptoms in the past 3-months;
- bacterial spondylitis;
- Rheumatoid arthritis;
- ankylosing spondylitis;
- back pain secondary to bone malignancy
- spinal fracture;
- osteoporotic collapse;
- cauda equina compression
- prior spinal surgery;
- psychiatric disorder (e.g. psychosis / delusion);
- current pregnancy
- previous experience with Bowen therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universitylead
- United Christian Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
United Christian Hospital
Kwun Tong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andy S.K. Cheng, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double blinding of participants and outcome assessor will be adopted. Independent assessors who conduct outcome measures are blinded to the group assignments, so allocation concealment and masking can be preserved throughout the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 17, 2021
First Posted
April 27, 2021
Study Start
April 19, 2021
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
April 27, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share