The Effect of Air Polishing on the Tooth Surface
Analyzing the Effect of Different Polishing Materials on Different Dental Tissues by Micro-Computed Tomography
1 other identifier
observational
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of air-polishing device that operates by directing a fine slurry of pressurized air, water, and abrasive particles has become widespread in dentistry for polishing. The introduction of abrasive powders with different properties creates the need to evaluate the effects of these powders on dental hard tissues. This study was focused on the effect of sodium bicarbonate, glycine and erythritol air polishing on enamel and exposed root surface.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 24, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 27, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2021
CompletedApril 21, 2021
April 1, 2021
1 year
April 11, 2021
April 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Defect depth
The teeth were divided into three groups, the crown and exposed root surface were air polished using three powders at instrumentation time of 5s, combinations of medium and maximum power and medium water settings, distance of 5mm and angulation of 60 degree. Samples were scanned in a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at baseline and then after powder treatment and the defect depth was estimated.
5 second
Demineralization depth
The teeth were divided into three groups, the crown and exposed root surface were air polished using three powders at instrumentation time of 5s, combinations of medium and maximum power and medium water settings, distance of 5mm and angulation of 60 degree. Samples were scanned in a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at baseline and then after powder treatment and the demineralization depth was estimated.
5 second
Mineral density
The teeth were divided into three groups, the crown and exposed root surface were air polished using three powders at instrumentation time of 5s, combinations of medium and maximum power and medium water settings, distance of 5 mm and angulation of 60 degree. Samples were scanned in a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at baseline and then after powder treatment and the mineral density was estimated.
10 second
Defect volume
The teeth were divided into three groups, the crown and exposed root surface were air polished using three powders at instrumentation time of 5s, combinations of medium and maximum power and medium water settings, distance of 5mm and angulation of 60 degree. Samples were scanned in a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at baseline and then after powder treatment and the defect volume was estimated.
5 second
Study Arms (3)
sodium bicarbonate group
Sodium bicarbonate-based powder (CLASSIC®, EMS SA, Nyon, Switzerland) was used for air polishing the samples belonging to this group. All surfaces were numbered and application was made to the mesial and distal surfaces of the root, buccal and lingual surfaces of the crown to avoid repeated instrumentations. After device and samples were fixed, a metal plate with a 5 mm diameter hole was placed on the sample to limit the application area. Surfaces one and three were air-polished using the with a medium power setting (9 LED power setting), and surfaces two and four were air-polished using the with a maximum power setting (17 LED power setting). The distance between the handpiece and the tooth surface was kept constant at 5 mm, and the treatment angulation was adjusted to 60 degrees. In all applications, the application time was 5 seconds and the water setting was medium (6 LED). The powder chambers of the device were filled to the maximum level in each application.
glycine group
Glycine-based powder (PERIO®, EMS SA, Nyon, Switzerland) was used for air polishing the samples belonging to this group. All surfaces were numbered and application was made to the mesial and distal surfaces of the root, buccal and lingual surfaces of the crown to avoid repeated instrumentations. After device and samples were fixed, a metal plate with a 5 mm diameter hole was placed on the sample to limit the application area. Surfaces one and three were air-polished using the with a medium power setting (9 LED power setting), and surfaces two and four were air-polished using the with a maximum power setting (17 LED power setting). The distance between the handpiece and the tooth surface was kept constant at 5 mm, and the treatment angulation was adjusted to 60 degrees. In all applications, the application time was 5 seconds and the water setting was medium (6 LED). The powder chambers of the device were filled to the maximum level in each application.
erythritol group
Erythritol-based powder (PLUS®, EMS SA, Nyon, Switzerland) was used for air polishing the samples belonging to this group. All surfaces were numbered and application was made to the mesial and distal surfaces of the root, buccal and lingual surfaces of the crown to avoid repeated instrumentations. After device and samples were fixed, a metal plate with a 5 mm diameter hole was placed on the sample to limit the application area. Surfaces one and three were air-polished using the with a medium power setting (9 LED power setting), and surfaces two and four were air-polished using the with a maximum power setting (17 LED power setting). The distance between the handpiece and the tooth surface was kept constant at 5 mm, and the treatment angulation was adjusted to 60 degrees. In all applications, the application time was 5 seconds and the water setting was medium (6 LED). The powder chambers of the device were filled to the maximum level in each application.
Interventions
AIR-FLOW® Master Piezon is intended for use in the cleaning and polishing of teeth by the projection of water,air, and dental powders onto the tooth surface. The device removes dental plaque, soft deposits, and surface stains from pits, grooves, interproximal spaces, or smooth surfaces of teeth. This air polishing device was used for all powder instrumentations.
Eligibility Criteria
The patients were recruited from individuals seeking periodontal and/or dental treatment at Kocaeli University, Faculty of Dentistry.
You may qualify if:
- Being older than age of 18,
- Willing to participate the study,
- To have a single rooted tooth with gingival recession on all surfaces and need to be extracted,
- The tooth has to be free of caries, defects and restorations.
You may not qualify if:
- Have history of infectious diseases like Hepatitis and/or HIV (+).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kocaeli University, Faculty of Dentistry
Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (19)
Petersilka GJ. Subgingival air-polishing in the treatment of periodontal biofilm infections. Periodontol 2000. 2011 Feb;55(1):124-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00342.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 21134232BACKGROUNDGraumann SJ, Sensat ML, Stoltenberg JL. Air polishing: a review of current literature. J Dent Hyg. 2013 Aug;87(4):173-80.
PMID: 23986410BACKGROUNDGutmann ME. Air polishing: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Dent Hyg. 1998 Summer;72(3):47-56.
PMID: 9693568BACKGROUNDWeaks LM, Lescher NB, Barnes CM, Holroyd SV. Clinical evaluation of the Prophy-Jet as an instrument for routine removal of tooth stain and plaque. J Periodontol. 1984 Aug;55(8):486-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1984.55.8.486.
PMID: 6592321BACKGROUNDBerkstein S, Reiff RL, McKinney JF, Killoy WJ. Supragingival root surface removal during maintenance procedures utilizing an air-powder abrasive system or hand scaling. An in vitro study. J Periodontol. 1987 May;58(5):327-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.1987.58.5.327.
PMID: 3295185BACKGROUNDBarnes CM, Russell CM, Gerbo LR, Wells BR, Barnes DW. Effects of an air-powder polishing system on orthodontically bracketed and banded teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Jan;97(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81712-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 2136972BACKGROUNDKontturi-Narhi V, Markkanen S, Markkanen H. Effects of airpolishing on dental plaque removal and hard tissues as evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. J Periodontol. 1990 Jun;61(6):334-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1990.61.6.334.
PMID: 2366141BACKGROUNDAtkinson DR, Cobb CM, Killoy WJ. The effect of an air-powder abrasive system on in vitro root surfaces. J Periodontol. 1984 Jan;55(1):13-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1984.55.1.13.
PMID: 6319658BACKGROUNDBarnes CM, Covey D, Watanabe H, Simetich B, Schulte JR, Chen H. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials. J Clin Dent. 2014;25(4):76-87.
PMID: 26054183BACKGROUNDPelka M, Trautmann S, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Influence of air-polishing devices and abrasives on root dentin-an in vitro confocal laser scanning microscope study. Quintessence Int. 2010 Jul-Aug;41(7):e141-8.
PMID: 20614037BACKGROUNDSahrmann P, Ronay V, Schmidlin PR, Attin T, Paque F. Three-dimensional defect evaluation of air polishing on extracted human roots. J Periodontol. 2014 Aug;85(8):1107-14. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130629. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
PMID: 24476548BACKGROUNDTada K, Kakuta K, Ogura H, Sato S. Effect of particle diameter on air polishing of dentin surfaces. Odontology. 2010 Feb;98(1):31-6. doi: 10.1007/s10266-009-0113-8. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
PMID: 20155505BACKGROUNDTada K, Wiroj S, Inatomi M, Sato S. The characterization of dentin defects produced by air polishing. Odontology. 2012 Jan;100(1):41-6. doi: 10.1007/s10266-011-0019-0. Epub 2011 May 10.
PMID: 21556726BACKGROUNDHerr ML, DeLong R, Li Y, Lunos SA, Stoltenberg JL. Use of a continual sweep motion to compare air polishing devices, powders and exposure time on unexposed root cementum. Odontology. 2017 Jul;105(3):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0282-1. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
PMID: 28070701BACKGROUNDCamboni S, Donnet M. Tooth Surface Comparison after Air Polishing and Rubber Cup: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study. J Clin Dent. 2016 Mar;27(1):13-18.
PMID: 28390211BACKGROUNDPetersilka GJ, Bell M, Mehl A, Hickel R, Flemmig TF. Root defects following air polishing. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Feb;30(2):165-70. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.300204.x.
PMID: 12622860BACKGROUNDPetersilka GJ, Bell M, Haberlein I, Mehl A, Hickel R, Flemmig TF. In vitro evaluation of novel low abrasive air polishing powders. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Jan;30(1):9-13. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.300102.x.
PMID: 12702105BACKGROUNDAgger MS, Horsted-Bindslev P, Hovgaard O. Abrasiveness of an air-powder polishing system on root surfaces in vitro. Quintessence Int. 2001 May;32(5):407-11.
PMID: 11444076BACKGROUNDGalloway SE, Pashley DH. Rate of removal of root structure by the use of the Prophy-Jet device. J Periodontol. 1987 Jul;58(7):464-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1987.58.7.464.
PMID: 3476717BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- research assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2021
First Posted
April 21, 2021
Study Start
July 24, 2019
Primary Completion
July 27, 2020
Study Completion
September 14, 2020
Last Updated
April 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04