NCT04561960

Brief Summary

Miswak has been recommended by world health organization for oral hygiene because of its availability, beneficial effect and affordability. The popularity of Miswak in Arab countries has meant that there have been several studies that have confirmed the ability of miswak to provide effective mechanical and chemical cleansing when used as an adjunct to other oral hygiene aids. Fluoridated tooth paste and manual tooth brushes have been the standard of clinical preventive dental care for over 50 years.However, the objection to the use of fluorides by some parents has meant that these pastes are not universally accepted. There are several non-fluoridated pastes available in the market that include the extract of miswak. There are few studies that have compared these pastes to fluoridated pastes and to miswak as a stand alone agents. Miswak has been recommended by world health organization in 1987 for oral hygiene because of its availability, beneficial effect and affordability. It has been stated that "Several clinical studies have confirmed that the mechanical and chemical cleansing efficiency of miswak chewing sticks are equal and at times greater than that of the toothbrush" this was mentioned and reviewed that it is in fact right but only when used in a regular constant matter with a proper and effective way of plaque removal. This study aims to use a cross over model to study the effectiveness of miswak as a stand alone agent in maintaining oral hygiene in young adults and compare it miswak containing toothpastes and fluoridated toothpastes when used with a manual tooth brush.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 16, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 24, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 30, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 10, 2020

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 8, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

miswaksiwakS. persicachew stick

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Base line Plaque Score

    Silness-Löe Index: #16, #12, #24, #36, #32, #44Missing teeth are not substituted. 0-3, 0 being absent from plaque

    Baseline

  • Plaque Score change at 1 week

    Silness-Löe Index: #16, #12, #24, #36, #32, #44Missing teeth are not substituted. 0-3, 0 being absent from plaque

    One week

  • Plaque Score change at 2 weeks

    Silness-Löe Index: #16, #12, #24, #36, #32, #44Missing teeth are not substituted. 0-3, 0 being absent from plaque

    Two weeks

  • Baseline Bleeding Score

    Gingival Index (Loe \& Silness 1963): #16, #12, #24, #36, #32, #44Missing teeth are not substituted. 0-4 . 0 being absent from inflammation

    Baseline

  • Bleeding Score change at 1 week

    Gingival Index (Loe \& Silness 1963): #16, #12, #24, #36, #32, #44Missing teeth are not substituted. 0-4 . 0 being absent from inflammation

    One week

  • Bleeding Score change at 2 weeks

    Gingival Index (Loe \& Silness 1963): #16, #12, #24, #36, #32, #44Missing teeth are not substituted. 0-4 . 0 being absent from inflammation

    Two weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Presence of White spot lesions

    Two weeks

Study Arms (3)

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will be trained to perform oral hygiene using the modified bass technique. The participants will be asked to brush their teeth twice daily using a manual tooth brush and fluoridated toothpaste containing 1450ppm of fluoride

Drug: Fluoride toothpasteDevice: Toothbrush

Miswak

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will be trained to chew and condition a miswak stick Participants will be asked to use the miswak stick twice daily

Device: Miswak Stick

Miswak Paste

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will be trained to perform oral hygiene using the modified bass technique. The participants will be asked to brush their teeth twice daily using a manual tooth brush a non-fluoridated toothpaste containing miswak extract

Drug: Toothpaste ProductDevice: Toothbrush

Interventions

Fluoridated paste containing 1450ppm NaF

Control

Non Fluoridated toothpaste with extract of miswak ( Dabur, miswak tooth paste)

Miswak Paste

Colgate classic clean Soft bristled toothbrushes, 19.05 x 1.27 x 1.91 cm

ControlMiswak Paste

A miswak stick of 15 cm length

Miswak

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy adults
  • Able to perform their own oral hygiene
  • Dental students

You may not qualify if:

  • Active Dental Caries
  • Uncontrolled chronic medical conditions
  • History of drug and/or treatment that reduces salivary flow
  • Currently undergoing orthodontic treatment
  • Missing index teeth #16, #12, #24, #36, #32, #44

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Riyadh Elm University

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Hawkins BF, Kohout FJ, Lainson PA, Heckert A. Duration of toothbrushing for effective plaque control. Quintessence Int. 1986 Jun;17(6):361-5. No abstract available.

  • Elvin-Lewis M. The therapeutic potential of plants used in dental folk medicine. Odontostomatol Trop. 1982 Sep;5(3):107-17. No abstract available.

  • Patel PV, Shruthi S, Kumar S. Clinical effect of miswak as an adjunct to tooth brushing on gingivitis. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Jan;16(1):84-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.94611.

  • Al-Otaibi M, Al-Harthy M, Gustafsson A, Johansson A, Claesson R, Angmar-Mansson B. Subgingival plaque microbiota in Saudi Arabians after use of miswak chewing stick and toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1048-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00618.x.

  • Halawany HS. A review on miswak (Salvadora persica) and its effect on various aspects of oral health. Saudi Dent J. 2012 Apr;24(2):63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 28.

  • Haque MM, Alsareii SA. A review of the therapeutic effects of using miswak (Salvadora Persica) on oral health. Saudi Med J. 2015 May;36(5):530-43. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.5.10785.

  • Devi, Aruna M.; Hampannavar, Pooja; Radha, G.; Kadanakuppe, Sushi; Nagashree, S. R.; Kumar, Vinod A. (2011) Comparing the Efficacy of Plaque Removal between Salvadora persica (Miswak) and Manual Toothbrush in 12 to 15 Years School Children. World Journal of Dentistry, 2(1), pp. 29-33.

    RESULT
  • Norton MR, Addy M. Chewing sticks versus toothbrushes in West Africa. A pilot study. Clin Prev Dent. 1989 May-Jun;11(3):11-3.

  • Malik AS, Shaukat MS, Qureshi AA, Abdur R. Comparative effectiveness of chewing stick and toothbrush: a randomized clinical trial. N Am J Med Sci. 2014 Jul;6(7):333-7. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.136916.

  • World Health Organization. (1997). Oral health surveys: basic methods, 4th ed. World Health Organization

    RESULT
  • Darout IA, Skaug N, Albandar JM. Subgingival microbiota levels and their associations with periodontal status at the sampled sites in an adult Sudanese population using miswak or toothbrush regularly. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Apr;61(2):115-22. doi: 10.1080/00016350310002784.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Plaque

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental DepositsTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Omar Alkadhi, MSc

    Head of IRB, REU

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Sarah S Aburaisi, MSc

    Assistant Professor, prothetic dental department, REU

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2020

First Posted

September 24, 2020

Study Start

September 30, 2020

Primary Completion

December 10, 2020

Study Completion

December 30, 2020

Last Updated

March 10, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations