Comparison of the Effectiveness of the USG and CBCT Combined With Intraoral Scanning Determing the Gingival Phenotype in the Healthy Periodontium

NCT04845581 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: kb245/2018(2)
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 30
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Compare two diagnostic methods: UGTM and CBCT/CAD/PDIP in determing the gingival phenotype in group of 30 periodontally healthy patients. Both methods were useful to establishing the gingival phenotype, however, ultrasonic method was more precisely for measurement of gingival thickness. There was positive correlation between the mean values of SGT and WKT and this indicates the need to measure these parameters in order to determine gingival phenotype.

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Determination the gingival phenotype

  The UGTM and CBCT/CAD/PDIP methods are useful to determining of gingival phenotype but more accurate and repeatability is UGTM. The presence of a positive correlation between SGT and WKT indicates the need to measured these parameters for the evaluation of GP. T. It is very important to determine the gingival phenotype for each dento-gingival unit especially before complicated dental treatment.

  october 2018 to august 2019

Interventions

Diagnostic tests: Determination of the gingival phenotype, measure gingival thickness and width of keratinized tissue PROCEDURE

Gingival thickness was measured using UGTM method and CBCT/ CAD with PDIP technology at upper incisors and canines in three points localized midbucally : Free gingival thickness (FGT), supracrestal ( SGT) and crestal (CGT). Width of keratinized tissue was measured using periodontal probe calibrated for 1 mm. The gingival phenotype was determined by both methods according to the following criteria: GT ≤ 0,7 mm - thin gingival phenotype, GT \> 0,7 mm ≤ 1,0 mm - medium gingival phenotype, GT \> 1,0 mm - thick gingival phenotype. Toincrease the repeatability of the results, two researchers tested the same values twice on 2days interval between sessions.

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 24 Years - 54 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

male 16 female 14

You may qualify if:

• lack of general diseases
• good oral hygiene
• healthy periodontium - API ratio\<15%, BOP\<10%
• no loss of clinical attachment in the examined areas (CAL=0)
• no use of drugs
• no addictions, especially cigarette smoking
• no use of mobile prosthetic restorations and orthodontic appliances
• no contraindications for X-ray examinations

You may not qualify if:

• general diseases
• poor oral hygiene
• non healthy periodontium - API ratio\>15%, BOP\>10%
• loss of clinical attachment in the examined areas (CAL\>1)
• use of drugs that could influence the structure of the periodontal tissues
• addictions, especially nicotinism
• use of mobile prosthetic restorations and orthodontic appliances
• contraindications for X-ray examinations

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Wroclaw Medical University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Wroclaw Medical University

Wroclaw, 52129, Poland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mouth Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

• wojciech bednarz, prof

  wroclaw medical univeristy

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE ONLY
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: March 22, 2021
• First Posted: April 15, 2021
• Study Start: October 11, 2018
• Primary Completion: July 20, 2019
• Study Completion: August 2, 2019
• Last Updated: April 15, 2021

Record last verified: 2020-01

Locations

PL (1)