Evaluation of Periodontal Phenotype Using CBCT, Computed Aided Design (CAD) and Prosthetic-driven Implant Planing (PDIP).
(CBCT)(CAD)
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of CBCT/CAD and PDIP technology makes it possible to determine the gingival and the periodontal phenotype, and it can be useful in establishing treatment plan in which it is required to carry out radiological diagnostics. Assessment of the periodontal and the gingival phenotype in a patient using the method based on CW/CL ratio is unreliable. Determining it for each dento-gingival unit is the appropriate method. Positive correlation between FGT, WKT and AC-GM distance confirms the purpose of measuring these parameters for evaluation of the gingival phenotype and additional TLPAC2 for the periodontal phenotype.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 11, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 13, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2019
CompletedOctober 22, 2019
October 1, 2019
7 months
September 19, 2019
October 18, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
determination the gingival and the periodontal phenotype
The use of CBCT, CAD and PDIP technology makes it possible to determine the gingival and the periodontal phenotype, and it can be useful in establishing treatment plan in which it is required to carry out radiological diagnostics. Assessment of the periodontal and the gingival phenotype in a patient using the method based on CW/CL (%) ratio is unreliable. Determining it for each dento-gingival unit is the appropriate method. Positive correlation between FGT (mm), WKT(mm) and AC-GM (mm) distance confirms the purpose of measuring these parameters for evaluation of the gingival phenotype and additional TLPAC2 for the periodontal phenotype.
October 2018 to July 2019
Interventions
Measurements were performed at upper canines and incisors in thirty periodontally healthy patients. The CBCT/CAD technology along with the PDIP software were used to measure crestal (CGT in mm ), supracrestal (SGT in mm) and free gingival thickness (FGT in mm ) as well as alveolar crest-gingival margin (AC-GM) and cemento-enamel junction (AC-CEJ) distance and the TLPAC localized 2, 4 and 8mm apically than the edge of the AC. Width of keratinized tissue (WKT) were measured using a periodontal probe. For each patient, the periodontal phenotype was evaluated on the basis of coronal width/length (CW/CL in percentages) ratio of both upper central incisors. For each tooth, the gingival phenotype was assessed on the basis of the GT measurement( in mm).
Eligibility Criteria
male 16 female 14
You may qualify if:
- lack of general diseases
- good hygiene of oral cavity
- healthy periodontium - API ratio\<15%, BOP\<10%
- no loss of clinical attachment in the examined sites (CAL=0)
- no use of drugs that could influence the structure of the periodontal tissues
- no addictions, especially nicotinism
- no use of mobile prosthetic restorations and orthodontic appliances
- no contraindications for X-ray examinations
You may not qualify if:
- general diseases
- bad hygiene of oral cavity
- non healthy periodontium - API ratio\>15%, BOP\>10%
- loss of clinical attachment in the examined sites (CAL\>1)
- use of drugs that could influence the structure of the periodontal tissues
- addictions, especially nicotinism
- use of mobile prosthetic restorations and orthodontic appliances
- contraindications for X-ray examinations
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wroclaw Medical University
Wroclaw, 52129, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
wojciech bednarz, prof
Medical Uniwersity Wroclaw
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2019
First Posted
October 22, 2019
Study Start
October 11, 2018
Primary Completion
May 13, 2019
Study Completion
July 7, 2019
Last Updated
October 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10