NCT04836741

Brief Summary

Central South University in collaboration with Tianjin University developed the first domestically produced Chinese minimally invasive surgical (MIS) robot system which named "Micro Hand S" in 2013. This new MIS robot had been authorized to enter the clinical trial stage by the Ethics Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital at Central South University. The Micro Hand S robot is safe and feasible in the preliminary study. However, compared with minimally invasive approaches (da Vici, laparoscope), the merits and demrits of rectectomy for rectal cancer are unclear. Therefore, the investigators conduct this retrospective study to focus on this concern.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
105

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2015

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 29, 2021

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

March 29, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (17)

  • Type of surgical procedure

    It was defined as what type of procedure was pferformed, for example, low anterior, abdominal perineal resection

    up to 1 week after operation

  • Operative time (min)

    It was defined as the duration from skin incision to skin closure

    up to 1 week after operation

  • Conversion

    Conversion was defined as any change in strategy to open surgery

    up to 1 week after operation

  • Bloos loss (ml)

    It was defined as the amount of blood in the whole surgical time

    up to 1 week after operation

  • Protective ileostomy

    It was defined as ileostomy which diverted the feces to To ensure anastomotic healing

    up to 1 month after operation

  • Hospital stay (day)

    It was defined as the length of hospital stay

    up to 1 month after operation

  • Tumor size (cm)

    It was defined as the longitudinal diameter of the tumor

    up to 1 month after operation

  • Retrieved lymph node

    It was defined as the number of all the lymph nodes for each patien

    up to 1 month after operation

  • pTNM stage

    It was defined as the pathological stage of the tumor according the TNM classification

    up to 1 month after operation

  • Length of distal ressction margin (cm)

    It was defined as the distance betwen the distal resection margin and the low margin of the tumor

    up to 1 month after operation

  • Status of the surgical margin

    It was defined as whether the distal and circumferential resection margins was involved the tumor cell under microscope

    up to 1 month after operation

  • Quality of specimen

    The quality of the speciman was graded according to the protocol proposed by Quirke

    up to 1 month after operation

  • Postoperative complication

    It was defined as the adverse events after operation and the complications were classfied according to the Clavien-Dindo (C-D) classification

    up to 1 month after operation

  • International Prostate Symptom Score

    It assessed the urination with 7 items

    at least12 months after operation

  • International Index of Erectile Function

    It assessed erectile function with 5 items

    at least 12 months after operation

  • Local recurrence

    It was defined as the tumor was again found in the pelvic cavity

    at least 1 years after operation

  • Disease free survival

    It was defined as the duration between the operation and date of the tumor recurrence

    at least 1 years after operation

Study Arms (2)

Micro Hand S robot-assisted surgery

EXPERIMENTAL

This group is consisted of 40 cases performed using the Micro Hand S robot by one single surgeon for rectal cancer

Device: Micro Hand S robot

Laparoscopic surgery

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group is consisted of 65 cases performed using the laparoscope by one single surgeon for rectal cancer

Device: Laparoscope

Interventions

The surgeries are performed with the Micro Hand S robot

Micro Hand S robot-assisted surgery

The surgeries are performed with the laparoscope

Laparoscopic surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • histologically confirmed rectal cancer; ASA score \< 3

You may not qualify if:

  • palliative resections, combined resections, distant metastasis, a previous history of abdominal/or pelvic surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Wang Y, Wang G, Li Z, Ling H, Yi B, Zhu S. Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and "Micro Hand S" robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 7;21(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01834-1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rectal Neoplasms

Interventions

Laparoscopes

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EndoscopesDiagnostic EquipmentEquipment and SuppliesSurgical Equipment

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2021

First Posted

April 8, 2021

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion

November 30, 2018

Study Completion

December 31, 2019

Last Updated

April 8, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations