Investigation Of The Relationship Between Imagery Ability, Balance And Functionality After Stroke

NCT04832334 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: Medipol Hospital 21
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 40
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

It was aimed to determine the relationship between post-stroke imagination ability, balance, and functionality, and to compare the motor imagery skills of those who had stroke with compatible healthy individuals.

Conditions

Stroke; Motor İmagery Ability; Mental Chronometry; Balance; Functionality

Keywords

stroke; motor imagery; mental chronometry; balance; functionality

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

• Fugl - Meyer Motor Recovery Assessment Form

  It will only be evaluated in the stroke group. It is a scale that evaluates sensorimotor recovery after stroke. Each parameter was scored as 0 points: unsuccessful, 1 point: partially successful, 2 points: completely successful performance on the scale, which includes 50 items specific to stroke and based on performance. The maximum score that can be taken for the upper extremity in the scale where voluntary movement, reflex activity, grip, coordination and speed are evaluated is 66 and 34 for the lower extremity.

  Day 0

• Mini-Mental State Test

  It was used to determine the cognitive state. The Mini-Mental State Test was first published by Folstein et al. It consists of eleven items under 5 main headings: orientation, record memory, attention and calculation, recall and language, and the total score is evaluated over 30 points. The ideal threshold value of the Mini-Mental State Test was found to be 24.

  Day 0

• Clock Drawing Test

  It will be used to assess the phenomenon of neglect of the stroke individual. The individual is asked to draw a clock circle and insert the numbers of the clock into it. After finishing the numbers, the hands of the clock are placed to show 11 to 10 past.

  Day 0

• Digit Span Test

  This test to evaluate the ability to sustain attention is a subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Revised battery. The test consists of two parts as forward and reverse range. In both parts, random numbers are read to the person at one second intervals, the numbers increase with each attempt and the person is asked to repeat in the same way. In both episodes, the number of digits of the previous sequence in which the person failed twice in a row constitutes the range. The maximum score that can be obtained for each section is 7, and a total of 14 points for the whole test.

  Day 0

• Kinesthetic and Visual Imaging Questionnaire

  The Kinesthetic and Visual Imaging Questionnaire has been developed to evaluate the imagination ability in individuals with physical disabilities. The purpose of the questionnaire is to determine to what extent individuals visualize and feel the movements they imagine.

  Day 0

• Box and Block Test

  It is a highly sensitive test for changes in upper extremity functional performance. However, this study will be used for evaluating mental chronometry ability rather than functional performance.

  Day 0

• Functional Independence Scale

  It is a scale used to evaluate the motor and cognitive competence of patients in daily life activities. Scale; It consists of 18 items that evaluate six functions: self-care, sphincter control, transfer, displacement, communication, and social perception. Each item is scored between 1 (activity fully dependent) and 7 (activity fully independent) in proportion to the amount of assistance received. A minimum of 18 and a maximum of 126 points can be obtained. A low score means that the level of addiction has increased.

  Day 0

• Berg Balance Scale

  It is a 14-item scale that evaluates the tasks used in daily life activities.Standing up without support, standing without support, sitting without support, standing up, transfers, standing with feet, standing with legs while standing, reaching out while standing, picking up from the ground, looking back, 360 degree rotation, firm side standing on the stool, one foot standstill and standstill functions are evaluated.Each item is planned between 0-4; 0 is unable to fulfill the task, 4 is to fulfill the task successfully. The total score of the test is between 0-56.0-20 points: wheelchair dependent, 21-40: assisted walking, 41-56: means independent ambulation.

  Day 0

• Time Up and Go Test

  The test measures the speed during many functional maneuvers such as standing up, walking, turning, and sitting. In the test, the person is asked to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters (10 feet) at a safe and normal pace, turn, walk back and sit on the chair, and the time is recorded in seconds. A short performance period indicates a good balance performance.

  Day 0

• Functional Reach Test

  Subjects will asked to stand comfortably, to make a fist, and to raise their arm until it was parallel to the yardstick (position 1). The placement of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will recorded. Subjects will then asked to reach as far forward as they could without losing their balance (position 2), and the position of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will again recorded. No attempt will make to control the subject's method of reach, but if he will touch the wall or took a step during the maneuver, that trial will consider invalid and repeated.

  Day 0

• Hand Lateralization Test

  It requires participants to question the laterality of the hand images presented and is commonly used to measure motor imagination ability in humans. It is used to evaluate implicit motor imagination ability. It is also a test that evaluates mental rotation, another dimension of imagination.

  Day 0

Study Arms (2)

Stroke Participants

Stroke patients with hemiplegia or chronic hemiparesis

Other: Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Box and Block Test, Hand Lateralization Test.; Other: Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test; Other: Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Independence Scale

Healthy Participants

The healthy control group was matched with stroke participants in terms of age, gender, dominant side and education level.

Other: Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Box and Block Test, Hand Lateralization Test.; Other: Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test; Other: Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Independence Scale

Interventions

Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Box and Block Test, Hand Lateralization Test. OTHER

Imagery ability was determined.

Healthy Participants; Stroke Participants

Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test OTHER

Balance level was determined.

Healthy Participants; Stroke Participants

Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Independence Scale OTHER

Functionality was evaluated.

Healthy Participants; Stroke Participants

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 40 Years - 80 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

In this study, we will enroll patients based on the statistics of the articles titled "Motor imagery in stroke patients or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral diseases" and "Effects of a single mental chronometry training session in subacute stroke patients - a randomized controlled trial". We calculated the power analysis from this article. According to this calculated; α=0.05, 1-β=0.90, effect size=0.96. Stroke patients treated at Istanbul Medipol University Pendik Hospital Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic Neurology Rehabilitation Unit and healthy individuals matching them will be included.

You may qualify if:

• Post-stroke hemiplegia or chronic hemiparesis
• Not having any neurological disorder other than stroke
• Not having vision problems that will affect the materials to be used during the treatment.
• To be able to communicate enough to understand the orders given
• Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT) score of 24 and above
• Not having seen a visualization application before
• Being between the ages of 40-80
• To be similar in terms of age, gender, education level of individuals with stroke

You may not qualify if:

• Having an advanced degree of aphasia
• Unilateral neglect
• Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT) score below 24 points
• Multiple stroke history
• Having pain and limitation of joint motion that will interfere with functional activity
• Walking restriction
• Serious communication or understanding problems
• Presence of serious cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic or orthopedic problems
• Presence of a secondary neurological disease

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Medipol University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Medipol University

Istanbul, Beykoz, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (5)

• Cho HY, Kim JS, Lee GC. Effects of motor imagery training on balance and gait abilities in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Aug;27(8):675-80. doi: 10.1177/0269215512464702. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

  PMID: 23129815 BACKGROUND

• Amesz S, Tessari A, Ottoboni G, Marsden J. An observational study of implicit motor imagery using laterality recognition of the hand after stroke. Brain Inj. 2016;30(8):999-1004. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2016.1147600. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

  PMID: 27294678 BACKGROUND

• Liepert J, Greiner J, Nedelko V, Dettmers C. Reduced upper limb sensation impairs mental chronometry for motor imagery after stroke: clinical and electrophysiological findings. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jun;26(5):470-8. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425924. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

  PMID: 22247502 BACKGROUND

• Morioka S, Osumi M, Nishi Y, Ishigaki T, Ishibashi R, Sakauchi T, Takamura Y, Nobusako S. Motor-imagery ability and function of hemiplegic upper limb in stroke patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019 Feb 17;6(3):596-604. doi: 10.1002/acn3.739. eCollection 2019 Mar.

  PMID: 30911582 BACKGROUND

• Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC. Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke. 2006 Jul;37(7):1941-52. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc. Epub 2006 Jun 1.

  PMID: 16741183 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular Disorders; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

• Fatma Mutluay, Professor

  İstanbul Medipol University

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Physiotherapist

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 1, 2021
• First Posted: April 5, 2021
• Study Start: March 20, 2021
• Primary Completion: September 20, 2021
• Study Completion: September 20, 2021
• Last Updated: December 10, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

TU (1)