What Are the Determinants of Explicit and Implicit Motor Imagery Ability in Stroke Patients?

NCT03635502 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: IstanbulMU1
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 77
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Motor imagery (MI) might be described as a dynamic process in which an individual mentally stimulates an action without any overt movement. After stroke, motor imagery ability is impaired and also due to structure of MI, not every stroke patients is able to perform MI. Therefore, the aim of the study is a) to compare both explicit and implicit motor imagery ability (MIA) between patients with stroke and healthy subjects, b) to examine predictive effects of clinical characteristics for MIA after stroke.

Conditions

Stroke; Healthy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3)

  MIQ-3 evaluates an individual's motor imagery ability in 3 subscales: 1. internal imagery, 2. external imagery, 3. kinesthetic imagery. Each of these scales ranges from 1 to 7 where 1 indicates very hard to see/feel (image) and 7 indicates very easy to see/feel. 12 items are included in the MIQ-3 and every item is scored according to the scales. The higher the score in subscales, the better the results are.

  15 min

• Chaotic Motor Imagery Assessment- Hand Rotation

  Hand Rotation is the first component of Chaotic Motor Imagery Assessment. In this measure, 96 drawings of each hand (left and right) from 4 different plane and at 12 different angle are presented to the individuals and then, it is asked to decide whether it is left or right hand. Total test time, total accuracy, total wrong answers, right accuracy, left accuracy, impaired hand and non-impaired hand accuracy is recorded as outcome scores.

  20 min

• Box and Block Test

  Box and Block Test is used to calculate mental chronometry (MC) ratio. During the test, patients are asked to carry 15 blocks first physically and then mentally from one box to another. As outcome scores, the time required to carry 15 blocks physically (MET) and mentally (MIT) are recorded. Then MC ratio is calculated with the formula: (MET-MIT)/ MET.

  5 min

• Fugl-Meyer Assessment- Upper Extremity

  Upper extremity part of Fugl Meyer Assessment (FMAUE) is used to evaluate patients' motor impairment level. Total motor and sensory scores are recorded. Then, patients are divided into 4 different categories according to their motor impairment level: 1. 23-31 points: poor upper extremity function, 2. 32-47 points: limited function, 3. 48-52 points: notable function, 4.53-66 points: full function.

  10 min

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Motor Activity Log-28

  5 min

Study Arms (2)

Stroke Group

Healthy Group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 80 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Stroke patients and age, sex, education matched healthy volunteers who meet the inclusion criteria

You may qualify if:

• Being between the ages of 18-80,
• Having a unilateral stroke for the first time and 0-6 months since stroke onset
• points and above in Mini Mental State Examination (MMDM)
• Not having a disease that may interfere with the study such as cardiac diseases, orthopedic conditions,etc.

You may not qualify if:

• Multiple strokes
• Sever cognitive dysfunction (\<24 points in MMDM)
• Unilateral neglect
• Upper extremity pain that interferes with the study or aggravated with movement
• Visual problems, aphasia or another sequel that might limit the assessment

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Istanbul Medeniyet University: lead
• Istanbul University: collaborator
• Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, 34394, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular Disorders; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Research Assisstant

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 14, 2018
• First Posted: August 17, 2018
• Study Start: August 17, 2018
• Primary Completion: September 30, 2018
• Study Completion: September 30, 2018
• Last Updated: December 27, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-12

Locations

TU (1)