Comparison of Oral Chloral Hydrate and Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine for Rescue After Failed Pediatric Procedural Sedation
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In Korea, oral chloral hydrate is still widely used for pediatric procedural sedation. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) on the success rate of rescue sedation after failed sedation (PSSS=4,5) with chloral hydrate (50mg/kg) The hypothesis of this study is that the intranasal dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) will improve the success rate of rescue sedation (PSSS=1,2,3) within 15 minutes. This is a prospective, parallel-arm, single-blinded, multi-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) with oral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg) in pediatric patients after failed sedation attempt with oral chloral hydrate. Prior to the procedure, each patient will be randomized in the control arm (oral chloral hydrate) or study arm (intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 22, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedNovember 24, 2023
November 1, 2023
3.3 years
March 19, 2021
November 21, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rate of adequate rescue sedation (PSSS = 1, 2, 3) within 15 minutes %
Success rate of adequate rescue sedation (Pediatric Sedation State Scale= 1,2,3) within 15 minutes after sedative administration. %
During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 1 hour)
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Onset time of rescue sedation (PSSS =1,2,3) (min)
During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)
Duration of rescue sedation = Recovery time (PSSS =4,5)
During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)
PSSS(Pediatric Sedation State Scale, 0-5)
During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)
HR during sedation (/min)
During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)
SpO2 during sedation (%)
During pediatric procedural sedation (up to 3 hour)
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
intranasal dexmedetomdine and kemtaine
EXPERIMENTALAdditional intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) to induce rescue sedation (pediatric sedation state scale = 1,2,3) after failed sedation attempt (PSSS=4,5) with oral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg)
oral chloral hydrate
ACTIVE COMPARATORAdditional oral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg) administration to induce rescue sedation (pediatric sedation state scale = 1,2,3) after failed sedation attempt (PSSS=4,5) with oral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg)
Interventions
Additional intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine (2mcg/kg) and ketamine (3mg/kg) to induce rescue sedation (pediatric sedation state scale = 1,2,3) after failed sedation attempt (PSSS=4,5) with oral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg)
Additional oral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg) administration to induce rescue sedation (pediatric sedation state scale = 1,2,3) after failed sedation attempt (PSSS=4,5) with oral chloral hydrate (50mg/kg)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pediatric patients who need procedural sedation (Age \< 7 years)
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status 1-3
- Failed to induce sedation with oral chloral hydrate 50mg/kg
You may not qualify if:
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status 4-5
- History of hypersensitivity to Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, or Chloral hydrate
- Recent administration of Alpha 2 adrenergic receptor agonist or antagonist
- Cannot administrate oral medication (e.g. Swallowing difficulty)
- Cannot administrate intranasal medication(e.g. Excessive rhinorrhea)
- Unstable vital signs, Unstable arrhythmia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jin-Tae Kim
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (8)
Zhang W, Wang Z, Song X, Fan Y, Tian H, Li B. Comparison of rescue techniques for failed chloral hydrate sedation for magnetic resonance imaging scans--additional chloral hydrate vs intranasal dexmedetomidine. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Mar;26(3):273-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12824. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
PMID: 26714442BACKGROUNDCao Q, Lin Y, Xie Z, Shen W, Chen Y, Gan X, Liu Y. Comparison of sedation by intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate for pediatric ophthalmic examination. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jun;27(6):629-636. doi: 10.1111/pan.13148. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
PMID: 28414899BACKGROUNDSheta SA, Al-Sarheed MA, Abdelhalim AA. Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Feb;24(2):181-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12287. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PMID: 24237879BACKGROUNDZanaty OM, El Metainy SA. A comparative evaluation of nebulized dexmedetomidine, nebulized ketamine, and their combination as premedication for outpatient pediatric dental surgery. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jul;121(1):167-171. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000728.
PMID: 25822924BACKGROUNDZhang W, Fan Y, Zhao T, Chen J, Zhang G, Song X. Median Effective Dose of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Rescue Sedation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Anesthesiology. 2016 Dec;125(6):1130-1135. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001353.
PMID: 27627818BACKGROUNDJun JH, Kim KN, Kim JY, Song SM. The effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Sep;64(9):947-961. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0917-x. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
PMID: 28639236BACKGROUNDAbdel-Ghaffar HS, Kamal SM, El Sherif FA, Mohamed SA. Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;121(2):445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
PMID: 30032884BACKGROUNDPoonai N, Canton K, Ali S, Hendrikx S, Shah A, Miller M, Joubert G, Rieder M, Hartling L. Intranasal ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in children: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0173253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173253. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28319161BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2021
First Posted
March 30, 2021
Study Start
September 22, 2022
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
November 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share