Combination Ketamine and Propofol vs Propofol for Emergency Department Sedation: A Prospective Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
99
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if procedural sedation utilizing a 1:1 mixture of propofol and ketamine is equivalent in complications, patient and physician satisfaction, post-procedure pain level, and procedural outcome to propofol sedation alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 4, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedDecember 12, 2014
December 1, 2014
2.5 years
December 10, 2010
December 11, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
airway complications
The use of any: Adjunctive airway device (nasopharyngeal airway (NPA)/oropharyngeal airway (OPA), Jaw thrust or other airway maneuver., Use of Bag Valve Mask (BVM) for ventilation and reversal medications (i.e. Narcan).
within 12 months of study completion
subclinical respiratory depression
subclinical respiratory depression (hypoxemia despite supplemental oxygen noted on pulse-oximetry, loss of End-tidal carbon dioxide concentration in the expired air (ETCO2) waveform for 15 seconds or greater, systolic pressure (SBP) below 80mm Hg, cardiac arrhythmias.)
within 12 months of study completion
satisfaction
Following sedation, questionnaires were completed by the sedating physician, any consultant physician, nurse, and patient
within 12 months of study completion
Study Arms (2)
1:1 ketamine - propofol mixture
ACTIVE COMPARATORpropofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORpropofol
Interventions
Prepare Ketamine and Propofol 10mg/cc of ketamine 10mg/cc of propofol mix 1:1 in 10 or 20 cc syringes Sedation Initial dose 0.05 cc / kg IV bolus. Repeat dose 0.025 - 0.05 every 60-90 seconds as needed to reach and maintain target level of sedation. May round to nearest 0.5-1 cc. Note - 1 cc = 5mg of propofol and 5mg of ketamine
Prepare Propofol 10mg/cc of propofol 10 or 20 cc syringes Sedation Initial dose 0.05 cc / kg IV bolus over 30 seconds. Repeat dose 0.025 - 0.05 cc/kg every 30-60 seconds as needed to reach and maintain target level of sedation. May round to nearest 0.5 cc Note - 1 cc = 10 mg of propofol
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking patients eighteen and older who present to the University of Utah Emergency Department and require, in their treating physician's opinion, procedural sedation for a procedure or radiologic study performed in the Emergency Department.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Related Publications (11)
Miner JR, Danahy M, Moch A, Biros M. Randomized clinical trial of etomidate versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;49(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.042. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
PMID: 16997421BACKGROUNDMiner JR, Gray RO, Stephens D, Biros MH. Randomized clinical trial of propofol with and without alfentanil for deep procedural sedation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;16(9):825-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00487.x.
PMID: 19845550BACKGROUNDBurton JH, Miner JR, Shipley ER, Strout TD, Becker C, Thode HC Jr. Propofol for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a tale of three centers. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):24-30. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.011. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
PMID: 16365337BACKGROUNDZed PJ, Abu-Laban RB, Chan WW, Harrison DW. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a prospective study. CJEM. 2007 Nov;9(6):421-7. doi: 10.1017/s148180350001544x.
PMID: 18072987BACKGROUNDFriedberg BL. Propofol-ketamine technique: dissociative anesthesia for office surgery (a 5-year review of 1264 cases). Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;23(1):70-5. doi: 10.1007/s002669900245.
PMID: 10022941BACKGROUNDFriedberg BL. Propofol ketamine anesthesia for cosmetic surgery in the office suite. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2003 Spring;41(2):39-50. doi: 10.1097/00004311-200341020-00006. No abstract available.
PMID: 12711912BACKGROUNDMessenger DW, Murray HE, Dungey PE, van Vlymen J, Sivilotti ML. Subdissociative-dose ketamine versus fentanyl for analgesia during propofol procedural sedation: a randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;15(10):877-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00219.x. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
PMID: 18754820BACKGROUNDSlavik VC, Zed PJ. Combination ketamine and propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia. Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Nov;27(11):1588-98. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.11.1588.
PMID: 17963466BACKGROUNDBowdle TA, Radant AD, Cowley DS, Kharasch ED, Strassman RJ, Roy-Byrne PP. Psychedelic effects of ketamine in healthy volunteers: relationship to steady-state plasma concentrations. Anesthesiology. 1998 Jan;88(1):82-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199801000-00015.
PMID: 9447860BACKGROUNDWillman EV, Andolfatto G. A prospective evaluation of "ketofol" (ketamine/propofol combination) for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;49(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
PMID: 17059854BACKGROUNDSharieff GQ, Trocinski DR, Kanegaye JT, Fisher B, Harley JR. Ketamine-propofol combination sedation for fracture reduction in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Dec;23(12):881-4. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e31815c9df6.
PMID: 18091596BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Scott Youngquist, MD MSc
University of Utah
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Virgil Davis, MD
University of Utah
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Troy Madsen, MD
University of Utah
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anas Sawas, MS MPH
University of Utah
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Ahern, DO
University of Utah
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2010
First Posted
January 4, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 12, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12