Augmented Infant Resuscitator to Enhance Newborn Ventilation
AIR
1 other identifier
interventional
270
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Augmented Infant Resuscitator (AIR) is an inexpensive add-on, compatible with nearly every existing bag-valve mask and many types of ventilation equipment. AIR monitors ventilation quality and provides real-time objective feedback and actionable cues to clinicians to both shorten training times and improve resuscitation quality, adoption, retention, and confidence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2021
CompletedMarch 29, 2021
March 1, 2021
4 months
February 17, 2021
March 26, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Effective bag-mask ventilation
Duration of effective bag-mask ventilation by clinician during a 2-minute trial. \[This will be a cumulative duration of the two minutes. This is measured internally from the AIR device. "Effective ventilation" is defined as having all three of the following conditions simultaneously: (1) Correct rate (30-60 breaths per minute); (2) Absence of significant leak (compliance \>4.0mL/cm H2O); and (3) Absence of a significant airway blockage (defined as compliance \<0.10 mL/cm H2O or resistance \>90 cmH2O/L/s). These measurements are determined by sensors in the AIR device for both arms of the study. Their accuracy for manikin use was determined to be 100% in the following trial: Bennett el al. Anesth Analgesia. 2018 Mar;126(3):947-955. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432.\]
2 minutes
Time to effective bag-mask ventilation
How long it takes for clinician to achieve effective ventilation during 2-minute trial. \[This is time from when the mask first touches the face of the manikin until all three icons are green. This is measured by a Research Assistant using a stop-watch. Again, "Effective ventilation" is defined as having all three of the following conditions simultaneously and is indicated to the RA by all three icons on the AIR device turning green: (1) Correct rate (30-60 breaths per minute); (2) Absence of significant leak (compliance \>4.0mL/cm H2O); and (3) Absence of a significant airway blockage (defined as compliance \<0.10 mL/cm H2O or resistance \>90 cmH2O/L/s). These measurements are determined by sensors in the AIR device for both arms of the study. Their accuracy for manikin use was determined to be 100% in the following trial: Bennett et al. Anesth Analgesia 2018 Mar;126(3):947-955. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432.\]
2 minutes
Clinician's correct assessment of mannequin airway issues
Ability of clinician to correctly assess three different manikin airway issues: normal, air leak, or obstruction. \[Manikin "conditions" are blinded to the participants and were either normal (as supplied by the manufacturer, had a "leak" insert (introduced compliance \>4mL/cm H2O), or had an "obstruction" insert (introduced a reduction in compliance \<0.10mL/cm H2O and resistance \>90 cm H2O/L/s. As per the parameters in the following paper: Bennett et al. Anesth Analgesia. 2018 Mar;126(3):947-955. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432.\]
2 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Blinded to visual feedback from AIR device
PLACEBO COMPARATORProviders did not receive AIR device feedback during newborn mannequin ventilation
Not blinded to visual feedback from AIR device
EXPERIMENTALProviders did receive AIR device feedback during newborn mannequin ventilation
Interventions
Device provides visual feedback related to air leak, obstruction, hyperventilation, hypoventilation, and harsh breaths
Device provides no visual feedback to clinician but records data on ventilation effectiveness
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Midwives, nurses, respiratory therapists, pediatricians, and neonatologists working as birth attendants in select hospitals in Uganda and the U.S. who are either previous trained in Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) and/or have a current Newborn Resuscitation Program (NRP) certification.
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Bennett DJ, Itagaki T, Chenelle CT, Bittner EA, Kacmarek RM. Evaluation of the Augmented Infant Resuscitator: A Monitoring Device for Neonatal Bag-Valve-Mask Resuscitation. Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):947-955. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432.
PMID: 28863023BACKGROUNDData S, Nelson BD, Cedrone K, Mwebesa W, Engol S, Nsiimenta N, Olson KR. Real-Time Digital Feedback Device and Simulated Newborn Ventilation Quality. Pediatrics. 2023 Nov 1;152(5):e2022060599. doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060599.
PMID: 37873596DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2021
First Posted
March 29, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share