NCT03133572

Brief Summary

Mortality rates from birth asphyxia in low-income countries remain very high. Face mask ventilation (FMV) is the most common method of resuscitating neonates in such settings. It is mostly performed by midwives but may not always be satisfactory. The i-gel® is a cuffless supraglottic airway which is easy to insert and provides an efficient seal that prevents air leakage with the potential to enhance the performance of neonatal resuscitation. Midwives can be trained in a short time to use this method. A pilot study in Uganda has demonstrated that midwives can safely perform resuscitation of newborn with the i-gel. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the use of a cuffless supraglottic airway compared to face-mask ventilation during neonatal resuscitation can reduce early neonatal death (before 7 days of life) or morbidity in neonatal encephalopathy (NE) in asphyxiated neonates. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING AND POPULATION A single-centre randomized clinical trial will be conducted at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda, among asphyxiated neonates in the delivery units. Prior to the intervention, all staff in the labour ward performing resuscitation will receive training according to the HBB curriculum with a special module for training on supraglottic airway insertion. Resuscitation will be performed according to international guidelines. UTILITY OF THE STUDY It is crucial to explore alternative, cost-effective modalities that not only would reduce mortality, but also the burden of neurological damage in survivors.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,163

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 26, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 28, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 8, 2018

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 12, 2019

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 29, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

April 26, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 25, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Composite outcome of either a) early neonatal death or b) neonatal encephalopathy

    A composite outcome of a) early neonatal death (within 7 days) b) neonatal encephalopathy (admission to NICU with a Thompson score of 11 or above in day 1-5 during hospitalisation).

    Day 7 of life

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Number of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Day 7 of life

  • Early neonatal death

    Day 7 of life

  • Very early neonatal death

    Day 1 of life

  • Neonatal encephalopathy

    Day 7 of life

  • Mild neonatal encephalopathy

    Day 7 of life

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Supraglottic airway

EXPERIMENTAL

All newborns in need of resuscitation in this arm will receive initial treatment with positive pressure ventilation using a supraglottic airway and a bag.

Device: Supraglottic airway

Face-mask

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All newborns in need of resuscitation in this arm will receive initial treatment with positive pressure ventilation using a face-mask and a bag.

Device: Face-mask

Interventions

Instead of using a conventional face mask to provide positive pressure ventilation during neonatal resuscitation we are using a supraglottic airway and a conventional bag.

Also known as: i-gel, supraglottic airway device
Supraglottic airway
Face-maskDEVICE

In order to provide positive pressure ventilation during neonatal resuscitation we are using a conventional face-mask and a conventional bag.

Face-mask

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 10 Minutes
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Inborn baby (=born in the hospital)
  • Expected ≥ 34-week gestation
  • Expected birth weight ≥ 2000 g
  • Need for PPV at birth
  • Parental consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Major malformations (incompatible with sustained life or affecting the airways)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mulago National Referral Hospital

Kampala, Uganda

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Pejovic NJ, Trevisanuto D, Nankunda J, Tylleskar T. Pilot manikin study showed that a supraglottic airway device improved simulated neonatal ventilation in a low-resource setting. Acta Paediatr. 2016 Dec;105(12):1440-1443. doi: 10.1111/apa.13565.

    PMID: 27582031BACKGROUND
  • Pejovic NJ, Trevisanuto D, Lubulwa C, Myrnerts Hook S, Cavallin F, Byamugisha J, Nankunda J, Tylleskar T. Neonatal resuscitation using a laryngeal mask airway: a randomised trial in Uganda. Arch Dis Child. 2018 Mar;103(3):255-260. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312934. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

    PMID: 28912163BACKGROUND
  • Pejovic NJ, Myrnerts Hook S, Byamugisha J, Alfven T, Lubulwa C, Cavallin F, Nankunda J, Ersdal H, Segafredo G, Blennow M, Trevisanuto D, Tylleskar T. Neonatal resuscitation using a supraglottic airway device for improved mortality and morbidity outcomes in a low-income country: study protocol for a randomized trial. Trials. 2019 Jul 19;20(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3455-8.

    PMID: 31324213BACKGROUND
  • Larsson M, Myrnerts Hook S, Mpamize A, Tylleskar T, Lubulwa C, Trevisanuto D, Elfving K, Pejovic NJ. Oxygen saturation after birth in resuscitated neonates in Uganda: a video-based observational study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Jan;6(1):e001225. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001225.

  • Pejovic NJ, Myrnerts Hook S, Byamugisha J, Alfven T, Lubulwa C, Cavallin F, Nankunda J, Ersdal H, Blennow M, Trevisanuto D, Tylleskar T. A Randomized Trial of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):2138-2147. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005333.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Asphyxia Neonatorum

Interventions

Masks

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Infant, Newborn, DiseasesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical AttireEquipment and Supplies, HospitalEquipment and SuppliesProtective DevicesPersonal Protective EquipmentSurgical EquipmentManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Thorkild Tylleskär, MD, PhD

    University of Bergen, Norway

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The neonatologists assessing the Thompson score will be blinded to the intervention arm. Other staff members will know about the arm allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Day by day, infants will be randomized to either of the arms.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2017

First Posted

April 28, 2017

Study Start

May 8, 2018

Primary Completion

August 12, 2019

Study Completion

December 1, 2021

Last Updated

June 29, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations