Study Stopped
No funding obtained
Heart Rate Assessment at Birth Comparing Stethoscope Versus Tap-based Application
Standard 6-sec Method Versus Tap-based Application Method to Assess Heart Rate at Birth - a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Some newborn babies have difficulty breathing at birth and need help. When babies need help with breathing the clinical team, the team measures heart rate using a stethoscope to check its heart rate and figure out what kind of help they will need. If the heart rate is too low, the clinical team will begin to inflate the baby's lung. Knowing the baby's heart rate quickly is important but the stethoscope is inaccurate, and might delay start of resuscitation. Using a smartphone app that uses screen tapping with a stethoscope could allow heart rate to be measured much faster compared to the stethoscope and allow the clinical team to support the baby's needs better immediately after birth.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2021
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
September 1, 2021
1.4 years
March 22, 2019
September 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to obtain Heart rate
Time to obtain Heart rate form birth
within the first 60 seconds form birth
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of heart rate assessment using either technique
within the first 60 seconds form birth
Study Arms (2)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORHeart rate assessment using the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 6-sec assessment method At birth, the clinical team will place the stethoscope on the infant chest and calculate heart rate by listening to the heart beat for 6-sec and then compute the heart rate of the newborn infant.
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALHeart rate assessment using Tap-based smartphone application At birth, the clinical team will place the stethoscope on the infant chest and calculate heart rate using a Tap-based smartphone application by tapping the screen for 3 beats at that time a heart rate will be displayed.
Interventions
Heart rate assessment using the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 6-sec assessment method At birth, the clinical team will place the stethoscope on the infant chest and calculate heart rate by listening to the heart beat for 6-sec and then compute the heart rate of the newborn infant.
At birth, the clinical team will place the stethoscope on the infant chest and calculate heart rate using a Tap-based smartphone application by tapping the screen for 3 beats at that time a heart rate will be displayed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All newborn infants delivered in the Royal Alexandra Hospital (RAH) 22+0-41+6 weeks gestation.
You may not qualify if:
- Infants will be excluded if parents refused to consent to the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 3V9, Canada
Related Publications (11)
Saugstad OD, Ramji S, Rootwelt T, Vento M. Response to resuscitation of the newborn: early prognostic variables. Acta Paediatr. 2005 Jul;94(7):890-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02007.x.
PMID: 16188811RESULTWyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB, Kapadia VS, Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Simon WM, Weiner GM, Zaichkin JG. Part 13: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S543-60. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000267. No abstract available.
PMID: 26473001RESULTDuryea EL, Nelson DB, Wyckoff MH, Grant EN, Tao W, Sadana N, Chalak LF, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. The impact of ambient operating room temperature on neonatal and maternal hypothermia and associated morbidities: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):505.e1-505.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.190. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
PMID: 26874298RESULTKamlin CO, O'Donnell CP, Everest NJ, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Accuracy of clinical assessment of infant heart rate in the delivery room. Resuscitation. 2006 Dec;71(3):319-21. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.015. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
PMID: 16989935RESULTKamlin CO, Dawson JA, O'Donnell CP, Morley CJ, Donath SM, Sekhon J, Davis PG. Accuracy of pulse oximetry measurement of heart rate of newborn infants in the delivery room. J Pediatr. 2008 Jun;152(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
PMID: 18492509RESULTKopotic RJ, Lindner W. Assessing high-risk infants in the delivery room with pulse oximetry. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jan;94(1 Suppl):S31-6.
PMID: 11900034RESULTLuong DH, Cheung PY, O'Reilly M, Lee TF, Schmolzer GM. Electrocardiography vs. Auscultation to Assess Heart Rate During Cardiac Arrest With Pulseless Electrical Activity in Newborn Infants. Front Pediatr. 2018 Nov 27;6:366. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00366. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30538976RESULTPatel S, Cheung PY, Solevag AL, Barrington KJ, Kamlin COF, Davis PG, Schmolzer GM. Pulseless electrical activity: a misdiagnosed entity during asphyxia in newborn infants? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Mar;104(2):F215-F217. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314907. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
PMID: 29895572RESULTOwen CJ, Wyllie JP. Determination of heart rate in the baby at birth. Resuscitation. 2004 Feb;60(2):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.10.002.
PMID: 15036740RESULTVoogdt KG, Morrison AC, Wood FE, van Elburg RM, Wyllie JP. A randomised, simulated study assessing auscultation of heart rate at birth. Resuscitation. 2010 Aug;81(8):1000-3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.03.021. Epub 2010 May 18.
PMID: 20483522RESULTBinotti M, Cavallin F, Ingrassia PL, Pejovic NJ, Monzani A, Genoni G, Trevisanuto D. Heart rate assessment using NeoTapAdvancedSupport: a simulation study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jul;104(4):F440-F442. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315408. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
PMID: 30262463RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Georg Schmolzer, MD, PhD
University of Alberta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- the outcome assessed will be masked to group allocation
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2019
First Posted
April 12, 2019
Study Start
December 16, 2019
Primary Completion
April 30, 2021
Study Completion
October 31, 2021
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- once study is completed and published
- Access Criteria
- email requests to the PI
requests can be made to the PI