Breast Cancer Patients' Cognitive Symptoms After Information About Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Symptoms
CONTEXT
Downsides of Being Well-Informed: Tracking and Preventing Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Problems in Breast Cancer Patients
4 other identifiers
interventional
148
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Previous cross-sectional studies have shown that informing cancer patients about potential chemotherapy-related cognitive symptoms may negatively affect perceived cognitive symptoms and verbal memory performance. A multicenter, randomized study in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients receiving (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy was performed to evaluate this Adverse Information Effect (AIE) over time and investigated whether inviting patients to self-affirm can reduce such AIEs on perceived cognitive symptoms and cognitive test performance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Mar 2014
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 23, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 23, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2021
CompletedMarch 24, 2021
March 1, 2021
2.5 years
March 17, 2021
March 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Between-group differences in mean change in the perceived frequency of cognitive symptoms from baseline to T1, and from baseline to T2.
Six items of the revised Medical Outcomes Study - cognitive functioning subscale (MOS-cog; Stewart \& Ware, 1992) to measure the perceived frequency of cognitive symptoms. Participants indicated the frequency of experiencing a range of day-to-day problems in six aspects of cognitive functioning during the past week (including today). Higher mean scores indicate better perceived cognitive functioning (range 0-100).
Prior to chemotherapy-initiation (baseline; T0), six months (T1), and twelve months (T2) later
Between-group differences in mean change in the perceived severity of cognitive symptoms from baseline to T1, and from baseline to T2.
Two items of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Multiple Myeloma module (MDASI-MM part 1; Cleeland et al., 2000; Jones et al., 2013) to measure the perceived severity of cognitive symptoms. Patients reported the severity of two cognitive symptoms at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being 'not present' and 10 being 'as bad as you can imagine': difficulty remembering and difficulty paying attention (concentrating). Higher mean scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Prior to chemotherapy-initiation (baseline; T0), six months (T1), and twelve months (T2) later
Between-group differences in mean change in verbal memory performance from baseline to T1, and from baseline to T2.
Online, adapted version of the Groningen Fifteen Words Test (Rey, 1964) measuring immediate recall (range 0-45), delayed recall (range 0-15) and recognition (range 0-30). Higher scores indicate better performance.
Prior to chemotherapy-initiation (baseline; T0), six months (T1), and twelve months (T2) later
Between-group differences in mean change in information processing speed and executive functioning from baseline to T1, and from baseline to T2.
Online version of the Trail Making Test (TMT; Reitan \& Wolfson, 1985) part A and B (and TMT-B to TMT-A ratio B/A) to measure the speed of information processing and executive functioning. The score on each part represents the amount of time in seconds required to complete the task. Higher scores indicate worse information processing and executive functioning.
Prior to chemotherapy-initiation (baseline; T0), six months (T1), and twelve months (T2) later
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Between-group differences in mean change in the levels of anxiety from baseline to T1, and from baseline to T2.
Prior to chemotherapy-initiation (baseline; T0), six months (T1), and twelve months (T2) later
Between-group differences in mean change in the levels of depression from baseline to T1, and from baseline to T2.
Prior to chemotherapy-initiation (baseline; T0), six months (T1), and twelve months (T2) later
Between-group differences in mean change in the perceived severity of other cancer-related symptoms from baseline to T1, and from baseline to T2.
Prior to chemotherapy-initiation (baseline; T0), six months (T1), and twelve months (T2) later
Between-group differences in pre-existing knowledge (prior to the experiment) about the potential cognitive symptoms of cancer treatment measured at twelve months follow-up (T2).
Measured at twelve months follow-up (T2)
Other Outcomes (13)
Between-group differences in mean change in the levels of the expected severity of cognitive symptoms from baseline to T1, and from baseline to T2.
Prior to chemotherapy-initiation (baseline; T0), six months (T1), and twelve months (T2) later
Between-group differences in mean change in the levels of the expected severity of other cancer-related symptoms from baseline to T1, and from baseline to T2.
Prior to chemotherapy-initiation (baseline; T0), six months (T1), and twelve months (T2) later
Between-group differences in mean change in the levels of motivation from baseline to T1, and from baseline to T2.
Prior to chemotherapy-initiation (baseline; T0), six months (T1), and twelve months (T2) later
- +10 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in the control group received standard information on treatment side-effects.
Information without self-affirmation
EXPERIMENTALBefore completing the study's online baseline survey (pre-chemotherapy), participants in the information group received standard information with additional written information about potential chemotherapy-related cognitive symptoms.
Information with self-affirmation
EXPERIMENTALBefore completing the study's online baseline survey (pre-chemotherapy), participants in the information+SA group (SA=self-affirmation) received standard and additional written information about potential chemotherapy-related cognitive symptoms with a subsequent self-affirmative text.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary breast cancer diagnosis stage I-III
- Scheduled to receive (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy
- years or older
- Sufficient command of the Dutch language
- Internet access
You may not qualify if:
- A history of neurological and psychiatric symptoms that influence cognitive functioning
- Previous cancer diagnosis
- Using drugs
- Drinking more than three alcoholic drinks a day
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Centerlead
- The Netherlands Cancer Institutecollaborator
- St. Antonius Hospitalcollaborator
- Meander Medical Centercollaborator
- Ziekenhuisgroep Twentecollaborator
- Isalacollaborator
- Deventer Ziekenhuiscollaborator
- Rijnstate Hospitalcollaborator
- Franciscus Gasthuiscollaborator
- St Jansdal Hospitalcollaborator
- UMC Utrechtcollaborator
Related Publications (1)
Jacobs W, Schagen SB, Brouwer SM, Kieffer JM, Baas IO, Los M, Sonke GS, Das E. The Effects of Being Informed About Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Symptoms With And Without Self-Affirmation on Perceived Cognitive Symptoms of Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Prospective, Longitudinal Study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Jul;22(5):439-454. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
PMID: 35491320DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Enny Das, PhD
Radboud University Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sanne B Schagen, PhD
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gabe S Sonke, PhD, MD
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Health care professionals were blinded to group assignment, but due to the nature of the study, patients were not. However, patients were not informed about the main outcomes and specific hypotheses of the study, or about the study's experimental conditions and the content of the texts that they did not receive until after T2.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MSc, study coordinator/PhD candidate
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2021
First Posted
March 24, 2021
Study Start
March 20, 2014
Primary Completion
September 23, 2016
Study Completion
September 23, 2016
Last Updated
March 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share