Cognitive Stimulation and Chemobrain. An Innovative Intervention for Cancer Survivors
Cognitive Stimulation Intervention Program for Cancer Survivors and Its Benefit on Cognitive Performance and Quality of Life
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study aims to establish a non-pharmacological alternative in alleviating cognitive deterioration derived from undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Thus, the effectiveness of a personalized and computerized cognitive stimulation program in breast cancer survivors is assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Jun 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedJune 8, 2022
June 1, 2022
1.1 years
October 14, 2021
June 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline in mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) at Week 8
The mini-MAC is a validated 29-item self-rated questionnaire that examines five cancer-specific coping strategies: fighting spirit, helplessness, anxious preoccupation, cognitive avoidance, and fatalism. Each item is scored using a 4-point Likert scale. Higher scores on each subscale mean greater use of that strategy.
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in Cognitive Assessment for Chemo Fog Research (CAB-CF) at Week 8
The CAB-CF is an online neuropsychological assessment battery that evaluates a total of 23 cognitive skills, grouped into 5 cognitive domains (attention, memory, coordination, perception, and reasoning). Each cognitive skill is scored from 0 to 800. The cognitive domain score is calculated by averaging the scores of the cognitive skills that comprise it. Higher scores mean better cognitive performance.
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in the Functionality Assessment Instrument in Cancer Treatment - Cognitive Function (FACT-COG) at Week 8
The FACT-COG is a 37 item self-report questionnaire that assesses patients' perception of their cognitive abilities, functionality, and quality of life. Each item is scored using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate less perceived cognitive impairment.
Baseline and Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change from Baseline in the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) at Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) at Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) at Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in the Measuring Quality of Life | The World Health Organization - abridged version (WHOQOL-BREF) at Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 8
Baseline and Week 8
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALOnline games designed to target specific cognitive skills such as attention, perception, or inhibition). Activities' difficulty will be automatically adjusted accordingly to each participant's performance, always demanding a maximum cognitive effort.
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnline painting and artistic games designed not to target the specific cognitive skills at test. Activities' duration will match those of the experimental group, and its difficulty will be constant through the intervention.
Interventions
Online gamified activities designed to stimulate cognitive functions (specifically executive function) will be carried out through a mobile application or web browser. Performance feedback will be shown after each activity.
Non-therapeutic online games based on artistic tasks designed to not train the specific cognitive abilities at test. The time of each session will match that of the experimental group. Performance feedback will be shown after each game.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have been diagnosed with breast cancer.
- Having undergone chemotherapy.
- Report objective or subjective complaints of cognitive impairment.
You may not qualify if:
- Metastases or brain tumors.
- Existence of a relevant medical, psychiatric, or neurological disorder.
- Significant visual or motor impairments.
- History of alcohol or drug abuse or dependence.
- Be receiving another cognitive stimulation intervention.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universidad Antonio de Nebrijalead
- Hospital de la Riberacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital la Ribera
Alzira, Valencia, 46600, Spain
Related Publications (13)
Ahles TA. Brain vulnerability to chemotherapy toxicities. Psychooncology. 2012 Nov;21(11):1141-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.3196. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
PMID: 23023994BACKGROUNDAsher A, Myers JS. The effect of cancer treatment on cognitive function. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2015 Jul;13(7):441-50.
PMID: 26353040BACKGROUNDBoykoff N, Moieni M, Subramanian SK. Confronting chemobrain: an in-depth look at survivors' reports of impact on work, social networks, and health care response. J Cancer Surviv. 2009 Dec;3(4):223-32. doi: 10.1007/s11764-009-0098-x. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
PMID: 19760150BACKGROUNDBray VJ, Dhillon HM, Bell ML, Kabourakis M, Fiero MH, Yip D, Boyle F, Price MA, Vardy JL. Evaluation of a Web-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation Program in Cancer Survivors Reporting Cognitive Symptoms After Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):217-225. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.8201. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
PMID: 28056205BACKGROUNDPendergrass JC, Targum SD, Harrison JE. Cognitive Impairment Associated with Cancer: A Brief Review. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2018 Feb 1;15(1-2):36-44.
PMID: 29497579BACKGROUNDFernandes HA, Richard NM, Edelstein K. Cognitive rehabilitation for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Sep;27(9):3253-3279. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04866-2. Epub 2019 May 30.
PMID: 31147780BACKGROUNDHardy SJ, Krull KR, Wefel JS, Janelsins M. Cognitive Changes in Cancer Survivors. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:795-806. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_201179.
PMID: 30231372BACKGROUNDHutchinson AD, Hosking JR, Kichenadasse G, Mattiske JK, Wilson C. Objective and subjective cognitive impairment following chemotherapy for cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012 Nov;38(7):926-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
PMID: 22658913BACKGROUNDJanelsins MC, Heckler CE, Peppone LJ, Kamen C, Mustian KM, Mohile SG, Magnuson A, Kleckner IR, Guido JJ, Young KL, Conlin AK, Weiselberg LR, Mitchell JW, Ambrosone CA, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. Cognitive Complaints in Survivors of Breast Cancer After Chemotherapy Compared With Age-Matched Controls: An Analysis From a Nationwide, Multicenter, Prospective Longitudinal Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 10;35(5):506-514. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5826. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
PMID: 28029304BACKGROUNDBail J, Meneses K. Computer-Based Cognitive Training for Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer Survivors. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Oct 1;20(5):504-9. doi: 10.1188/16.CJON.504-509.
PMID: 27668370BACKGROUNDVan Dyk K, Bower JE, Crespi CM, Petersen L, Ganz PA. Cognitive function following breast cancer treatment and associations with concurrent symptoms. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug 17;4:25. doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0076-4. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30131974BACKGROUNDVon Ah D, Habermann B, Carpenter JS, Schneider BL. Impact of perceived cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Apr;17(2):236-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
PMID: 22901546BACKGROUNDZeng Y, Dong J, Huang M, Zhang JE, Zhang X, Xie M, Wefel JS. Nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer patients: A network meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Apr;104:103514. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103514. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
PMID: 32004776BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jon A Duñabeitia
Universidad Nebrija
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jose L Tapia
Univerisdad Nebrija
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The intervention platform will randomly assign participants in a 1:1 ratio to one out of two groups (control/experimental), so both participants and researchers are blinded. Activities presented to the experimental group will target specific cognitive domains (mainly executive functions) and will be automatically adjusted in difficulty and requirement according to each participant's performance. Thus, maximum cognitive effort is always required. Activities presented to the active control group will target orthogonal unrelated cognitive domains (i.e. artistic cognitive processes) and will be of constant difficulty.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2021
First Posted
June 8, 2022
Study Start
June 3, 2022
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data protection policy of the public health system of the Spanish government does not allow researchers to share individual participant data.