Carotid Ultrasound Under Pulsed-wave Doppler Mode to Check the Pulse in Cardiopulmonary Arrest Patients.
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It's crucial to determine whether a pulse is present or not in patient with cardiac arrest. But more and more studies have shown that manual palpation is unreliable for detecting pulse 1-4. Failure to detect pulselessness may cause delay of chest compression and directly affect the patient's outcome. Likewise, failure to rapidly detect return of spontaneous circulation may cause prolonged chest compression and increase associated injury during resuscitation. More and more studies have demonstrated that echo guided pulse detection is feasible 5-7. The aim of our study is to check carotid pulse via ultrasound. This is a prospective study and the patient selection is in-hospital or out of hospital cardiac arrest. A curvilinear ultrasonography transducer is used and placed transversely on either right/left carotid artery under pulsed-wave doppler mode to check whether the pulse is present or not. The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the accuracy and effectiveness of clinical usage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
February 19, 2025
April 1, 2024
6.1 years
March 8, 2021
February 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler compared with manual palpation
The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the accuracy(e.g., no pulse under manual palpation but positive pulse-wave finding)of clinical usage.
5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler compared with manual palpation
The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the effectiveness (e.g., the time need to confirm whether pulse is present or not under manual palpation and ultrasound) of clinical usage.
5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation
Study Arms (1)
Patient presenting at emergent department with cardiac arrest
Interventions
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler mode to check whether carotid pulse is present
Eligibility Criteria
any patient presenting at ER with cardiac arrest older than 20 years-old, including trauma or non-trauma cardiac arrest, in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
You may qualify if:
- any patient presenting at ER with cardiac arrest older than 20 years-old
You may not qualify if:
- younger than 20 years-old
- patient who is pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 100, Taiwan
Related Publications (7)
Bahr J, Klingler H, Panzer W, Rode H, Kettler D. Skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. Resuscitation. 1997 Aug;35(1):23-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01092-1.
PMID: 9259056RESULTEberle B, Dick WF, Schneider T, Wisser G, Doetsch S, Tzanova I. Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic accuracy of first responders in patients with and without a pulse. Resuscitation. 1996 Dec;33(2):107-16. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01016-7.
PMID: 9025126RESULTMoule P. Checking the carotid pulse: diagnostic accuracy in students of the healthcare professions. Resuscitation. 2000 May;44(3):195-201. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00139-8.
PMID: 10825620RESULTLiberman M, Lavoie A, Mulder D, Sampalis J. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: errors made by pre-hospital emergency medical personnel. Resuscitation. 1999 Sep;42(1):47-55. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00082-9.
PMID: 10524730RESULTBadra K, Coutin A, Simard R, Pinto R, Lee JS, Chenkin J. The POCUS pulse check: A randomized controlled crossover study comparing pulse detection by palpation versus by point-of-care ultrasound. Resuscitation. 2019 Jun;139:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
PMID: 30902687RESULTSimard RD, Unger AG, Betz M, Wu A, Chenkin J. The POCUS Pulse Check: A Case Series on a Novel Method for Determining the Presence of a Pulse Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound. J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;56(6):674-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
PMID: 31003817RESULTGermanoska B, Coady M, Ng S, Fermanis G, Miller M. The reliability of carotid ultrasound in determining the return of pulsatile flow: A pilot study. Ultrasound. 2018 May;26(2):118-126. doi: 10.1177/1742271X17753467. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
PMID: 30013612RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2021
First Posted
March 10, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
February 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-04