NCT04788095

Brief Summary

This trial tests the feasibility of an application (app)-based mindfulness intervention and its effect on improving quality of life in patients with renal cell cancer that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). This trial aims to see whether an app-based mindfulness intervention may help patients cope with their disease.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 9, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 23, 2021

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 15, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

December 1, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (15)

  • Feasibility metric 1

    At least 90% of desired accrual is reached within 3 months (Yes or No)

    3 months

  • Feasibility metric 2

    At least 70% of patients are able to complete at least 2 of 4 intended intervention sessions for at least 2 of 4 weeks (Yes or No)

    3 months

  • Feasibility metric 3

    At least 70% of patients have at least 2 of 4 evaluable time points for the 4 assessments for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Fear of Cancer Recurrence. (Yes or No)

    3 months

  • Feasibility metric 4

    At least 70% of patients have at least 2 of 4 evaluable time points for the 4 assessments for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression. (Yes or No)

    3 months

  • Fear of Cancer Recurrence-7

    7-item scale that assesses the degree of FCR, with a cutoff score of 17 or above indicative of moderate and a cutoff score of 27 or above indicative of severe FCR. Reported as low, moderate, severe. Count and percentages provided for each level.

    3 months

  • PROMIS Emotional Distress: Anxiety

    This 8-item measure assesses symptoms of anxiety on a 5-point scale (1=never, 5=always). Scores range from 7-35 with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.

    3 months

  • PROMIS Emotional Distress: Depression

    This 8-item measure assesses symptoms of depression on a 5-point scale (1=never, 5=always). Scores range from 8-40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.

    3 months

  • Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G): Overall

    A 27-item self-related scale measure QoL across four domains of 'well-being' (physical, social/family, emotional and functional) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-108 for the total score. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.

    3 months

  • Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G): Physical

    A 27-item self-related scale measure QoL across four domains of 'well-being' (physical, social/family, emotional and functional) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-28 for the physical. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.

    3 months

  • Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G): Social/ Family

    A 27-item self-related scale measure QoL across four domains of 'well-being' (physical, social/family, emotional and functional) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-28 for the social/family. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.

    3 months

  • Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G): Functional

    A 27-item self-related scale measure QoL across four domains of 'well-being' (physical, social/family, emotional and functional) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 28 for the functional subscales. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.

    3 months

  • Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G): Emotional

    A 27-item self-related scale measure QoL across four domains of 'well-being' (physical, social/family, emotional and functional) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-24 for the emotional subscale. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.

    3 months

  • Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)

    A 15-item scale, designed to assess characteristics associated with mindfulness, such as: open or receptive awareness of and attention to what is taking place in the present. Participants use a scale from 1 to 6 (almost always - almost never), to indicate how frequently or infrequently they have each experience. Higher scores reflect higher levels of dispositional mindfulness. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.

    3 months

  • Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI): Fatigue severity

    This 9-item, 11-point rating scale was developed to assess subjective fatigue. The first three questions measure fatigue severity from 0, indicating "no fatigue," to 10, indicating "as bad as you can imagine," at current, usual, and worst levels. The following six questions assess fatigue interference with daily activities including general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (both inside and outside the home), relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. Response options range from 0, indicating "does not interfere," to 10, indicating, "completely interferes." Higher scores on the BFI correspond to greater self-reported levels of fatigue. The time period for all questions is over the past 24 hours. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.

    3 months

  • Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI): Fatigue Interferance

    This 9-item, 11-point rating scale was developed to assess subjective fatigue. The first three questions measure fatigue severity from 0, indicating "no fatigue," to 10, indicating "as bad as you can imagine," at current, usual, and worst levels. The following six questions assess fatigue interference with daily activities including general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (both inside and outside the home), relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. Response options range from 0, indicating "does not interfere," to 10, indicating, "completely interferes." Higher scores on the BFI correspond to greater self-reported levels of fatigue. The time period for all questions is over the past 24 hours. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.

    3 months

Study Arms (1)

Device feasibility (app-based mindfulness program)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients participate in a mindfulness-based program by using the Am app for 20-30 minutes every day, a minimum of 4 days each week over 4 weeks.

Device: Behavioral InterventionOther: Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther: Questionnaire Administration

Interventions

Participate in an app-based mindfulness program

Also known as: Behavior Conditioning Therapy, Behavior Modification, Behavior or Life Style Modifications, Behavior Therapy, Behavioral Interventions, Behavioral Modification, Behavioral Therapy, Behavioral Treatment, Behavioral Treatments
Device feasibility (app-based mindfulness program)

Ancillary studies

Also known as: Quality of Life Assessment
Device feasibility (app-based mindfulness program)

Ancillary studies

Device feasibility (app-based mindfulness program)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Sufficiently fluent in English
  • Cytologically or pathologically verified diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
  • Evidence of metastatic disease (including at a minimum computed tomography \[CT\] of the chest, abdomen and pelvis for staging)
  • Undergoing immunotherapy
  • A "moderate" or greater fear of cancer progression, as demonstrated by an Fear of Cancer Recurrence-7 (FCR-7) score of \>= 17
  • A fear of cancer progression, as demonstrated by a Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Anxiety score \>= 13
  • Have smart phone with internet access
  • Not suffering from current major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder or other psychiatric disorder
  • Not currently engaging in meditation one or more times per week within the previous year
  • Has not participated in an mindfulness-based cancer recovery (MBCR) or mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program in the past 5 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

City of Hope Medical Center

Duarte, California, 91010, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsKidney NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Sumanta K Pal

    City of Hope Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DEVICE FEASIBILITY
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2020

First Posted

March 9, 2021

Study Start

August 23, 2021

Primary Completion

June 15, 2026

Study Completion

June 15, 2026

Last Updated

March 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Locations