App-Based Mindfulness Intervention for the Improvement of Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer
Assessing Feasibility of an App-Based Mindfulness Intervention for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
3 other identifiers
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This trial tests the feasibility of an application (app)-based mindfulness intervention and its effect on improving quality of life in patients with renal cell cancer that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). This trial aims to see whether an app-based mindfulness intervention may help patients cope with their disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2026
CompletedMarch 24, 2026
March 1, 2026
4.8 years
December 1, 2020
March 20, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Feasibility metric 1
At least 90% of desired accrual is reached within 3 months (Yes or No)
3 months
Feasibility metric 2
At least 70% of patients are able to complete at least 2 of 4 intended intervention sessions for at least 2 of 4 weeks (Yes or No)
3 months
Feasibility metric 3
At least 70% of patients have at least 2 of 4 evaluable time points for the 4 assessments for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Fear of Cancer Recurrence. (Yes or No)
3 months
Feasibility metric 4
At least 70% of patients have at least 2 of 4 evaluable time points for the 4 assessments for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression. (Yes or No)
3 months
Fear of Cancer Recurrence-7
7-item scale that assesses the degree of FCR, with a cutoff score of 17 or above indicative of moderate and a cutoff score of 27 or above indicative of severe FCR. Reported as low, moderate, severe. Count and percentages provided for each level.
3 months
PROMIS Emotional Distress: Anxiety
This 8-item measure assesses symptoms of anxiety on a 5-point scale (1=never, 5=always). Scores range from 7-35 with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.
3 months
PROMIS Emotional Distress: Depression
This 8-item measure assesses symptoms of depression on a 5-point scale (1=never, 5=always). Scores range from 8-40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.
3 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G): Overall
A 27-item self-related scale measure QoL across four domains of 'well-being' (physical, social/family, emotional and functional) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-108 for the total score. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.
3 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G): Physical
A 27-item self-related scale measure QoL across four domains of 'well-being' (physical, social/family, emotional and functional) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-28 for the physical. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.
3 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G): Social/ Family
A 27-item self-related scale measure QoL across four domains of 'well-being' (physical, social/family, emotional and functional) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-28 for the social/family. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.
3 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G): Functional
A 27-item self-related scale measure QoL across four domains of 'well-being' (physical, social/family, emotional and functional) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 28 for the functional subscales. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.
3 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G): Emotional
A 27-item self-related scale measure QoL across four domains of 'well-being' (physical, social/family, emotional and functional) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-24 for the emotional subscale. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.
3 months
Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
A 15-item scale, designed to assess characteristics associated with mindfulness, such as: open or receptive awareness of and attention to what is taking place in the present. Participants use a scale from 1 to 6 (almost always - almost never), to indicate how frequently or infrequently they have each experience. Higher scores reflect higher levels of dispositional mindfulness. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.
3 months
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI): Fatigue severity
This 9-item, 11-point rating scale was developed to assess subjective fatigue. The first three questions measure fatigue severity from 0, indicating "no fatigue," to 10, indicating "as bad as you can imagine," at current, usual, and worst levels. The following six questions assess fatigue interference with daily activities including general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (both inside and outside the home), relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. Response options range from 0, indicating "does not interfere," to 10, indicating, "completely interferes." Higher scores on the BFI correspond to greater self-reported levels of fatigue. The time period for all questions is over the past 24 hours. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.
3 months
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI): Fatigue Interferance
This 9-item, 11-point rating scale was developed to assess subjective fatigue. The first three questions measure fatigue severity from 0, indicating "no fatigue," to 10, indicating "as bad as you can imagine," at current, usual, and worst levels. The following six questions assess fatigue interference with daily activities including general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (both inside and outside the home), relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. Response options range from 0, indicating "does not interfere," to 10, indicating, "completely interferes." Higher scores on the BFI correspond to greater self-reported levels of fatigue. The time period for all questions is over the past 24 hours. Data reported as continuous measure: means, standard deviation/ median range to be provided.
3 months
Study Arms (1)
Device feasibility (app-based mindfulness program)
EXPERIMENTALPatients participate in a mindfulness-based program by using the Am app for 20-30 minutes every day, a minimum of 4 days each week over 4 weeks.
Interventions
Participate in an app-based mindfulness program
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Sufficiently fluent in English
- Cytologically or pathologically verified diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
- Evidence of metastatic disease (including at a minimum computed tomography \[CT\] of the chest, abdomen and pelvis for staging)
- Undergoing immunotherapy
- A "moderate" or greater fear of cancer progression, as demonstrated by an Fear of Cancer Recurrence-7 (FCR-7) score of \>= 17
- A fear of cancer progression, as demonstrated by a Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Anxiety score \>= 13
- Have smart phone with internet access
- Not suffering from current major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder or other psychiatric disorder
- Not currently engaging in meditation one or more times per week within the previous year
- Has not participated in an mindfulness-based cancer recovery (MBCR) or mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program in the past 5 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- City of Hope Medical Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sumanta K Pal
City of Hope Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2020
First Posted
March 9, 2021
Study Start
August 23, 2021
Primary Completion
June 15, 2026
Study Completion
June 15, 2026
Last Updated
March 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03